Literature DB >> 25435700

The Effect of Thoracic Joint Mobilization and Self-stretching Exercise on Pulmonary Functions of Patients with Chronic Neck Pain.

Pil-Neo Hwangbo1, Gak Hwangbo2, Jungseo Park3, Sangyong Lee3.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The objective of this study was to determine the effect of thoracic joint mobilization and self-stretching exercise on the pulmonary functions of patients with chronic neck pain. [Subjects] The present study was performed with 34 patients with chronic neck pain featuring thoracic kyphosis; we divided them into a thoracic joint mobilization group (TJMG, n = 11), self-stretching exercise group (SSEG, n = 11), and thoracic joint mobilization and self-stretching exercise group (TJMSSEG, n = 12). [Methods] Treatments and exercise were conducted three times a week for six weeks in TJMG, SSEG, and TJMSSEG; the subjects' pulmonary functions in terms of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were measured using CardioTouch equipment.
[Results] Comparisons of the individuals within each of the TJMG, SSEG, and TJMSSEG showed that all of FVC, FEV1, and PEF increased significantly; Comparisons within each of the showed that FVC, FEV1, and PEF increased significantly. Among the study groups, FVC was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG after six weeks; FEV1 was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG and SSEG after four and six weeks; and PEF was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG and SSEG after six weeks.
[Conclusion] The study results indicate that thoracic joint mobilization and self-stretching exercise are effective interventions for increasing FVC, FEV1, and PEF among pulmonary functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pulmonary function; Self-stretching exercise; Thoracic joint mobilization

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435700      PMCID: PMC4242955          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.1783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

In modern society, as more people are sitting for longer periods and aging progresses, kyphosis in the thoracic vertebra has been increasing1); this results in rounded shoulders and a decrease in thoracic cavity and vital lung capacity2). In addition, this slouched posture puts the upper and lower cervical spine into a relative tension state while forwardly inclining the lower part of the cervical spine3). A sustained forward-bending posture in the cervical spine could increase the load around the tissues near the neck4), as well as the activities of muscles near the neck; additionally, the load increase in the assistant muscles and joints becomes a main cause of chronic pain near the neck and shoulder areas5). Many studies have sought to determine various causes of chronic neck pain, and to present therapeutic approaches from various aspects; the results of studies on what constitutes the best therapeutic approach to chronic neck pain, however, have been divergent6). Among the studies, one study reported that abnormal movement of the thoracic vertebra is a fundamental cause of cervical disorder in terms of the biomechanical correlation between the cervical spine and thoracic vertebra7). Another study reported that not only direct joint mobilization of the cervical spine but also improvement of movement in the upper thoracic vertebra can increase the range of motion and reduce pain in the cervical spine8). The most effective joint exercise therapy for increasing mobility in the thoracic vertebra is thoracic joint mobilization, which extends the joint in a direction in which movement is restrained9). A self-stretching exercise can not only increase the flexibility of muscles in the joints but can also reduce muscle tension and increase blood circulation10). Although many previous studies have sought to determine the effect of thoracic joint mobilization and self-stretching exercise on pain and range of joint motion, previous studies have not addressed their effects on pulmonary functions. The aim of the current study was to determine the effect of such treatment and exercise on the pulmonary functions of patients with chronic neck pain and thoracic kyphosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects of this study were 34 patients with chronic neck pain during spinal flexion who visited Hospital N located in Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea. Age, height, and weight in the TJM group (TJMG; 7 males and 4 females) were on average, 55.6±1.1 years, 164.5±2.6 cm, and 63.6±3.5 kg. In the SSE group (SSEG; 5 males and 6 females), they were 53.0±0.8 years, 166.8±2.8 cm, and 166.8±2.8 kg. Finally, in the TJMSSE group (TJMSSEG; 5 males and 7 females), they were 54.4±0.6 years, 167.3±2.3 cm, 65.0±3.5 kg. The subjects were randomly and equally assigned to the three groups. Prior to the experiment, all the subjects listened to an explanation of the study’s purpose and exercise methods and provided written consent. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Youngdong University institutional review board. Those who had been diagnosed with neurological findings and undergone operations or who were receiving surgical treatment or taking medicines on a regular basis to relieve pain were excluded from the study. We selected those with a spinal angle of 45 degrees or higher when measured in a standing position using a spinal mouse and a “minor disability” with a neck disability index ranging from 5 to 14 points. During a six-week period, the subjects were treated three times a week. TJMG performed TJM for 15 min, SSEG performed SSEs for 15 min, and TJMSSEG conducted TJM for 15 min and SSEs for 15 min. All three groups also received conservative physical therapy. TJMG first performed thoracic flexion mobilization. Each subject was instructed to sit on a therapeutic chair, cross his/her arms, and place them in the transverse in the jointed part of the cervical vertebrae behind the neck. The therapist stood to the left of the subject and fixed his/her vertebrae to the spinal segments intended to be treated. Using his/her hands, the therapist then adjusted the back support of the therapeutic chair or a wedge placed between the subjects and chair (Original Kaltenborn Concept Wedge, Allgummi GmbH & Co, Germany). The therapist then wrapped the subject’s crossed elbows with his/her hands and flexed the subject’s trunk slowly while pressing both elbows in the rear lower direction of the back support. During this process, the therapist used his/her hand to check the amount of spinal movement and potential movement of the vertebrae. Next, thoracic extension mobilization was performed. The therapist and the subject maintained the same posture as that of thoracic flexion mobilization. After wrapping the subject’s crossed elbows with a hand, the therapist slowly stretched the subject’s trunk backward by pressing both elbows in the rear upper direction of the back support. Finally, the separation technique of thoracic facet joint distraction mobilization was then employed. The subject lay face down on a treatment table. The therapist then selected the segments with less movement among the spinal auricular surfaces using a wedge and placed across the wedge crossways the selected vertebrae. The therapist grabbed the wedge with both hands and exerted a force for joint traction using his/her weight. SSEG conducted SSEs on the major and minor pectorals. First, the subject sat on a chair with his/her back straightened and pulled in his/her jaw. The subject held a long belt with both hands and spread it wider than the distance between the shoulders. While bending the shoulders at 180°, the subject flexed the shoulders excessively, as if stretching. After maintaining this position for 10 sec, the subject returned to the original position. Next, SSEs of the upper trapezius were performed. While seated with a correct posture on the chair, the subject fixed the hand intended to be extended behind a sheet placed under the hip to depress the shoulder. After this, the subject adopted a cervical posture (flexion + side flexion + rotation; non-coupled motion) to extend the upper trapezius to the fullest and maintained this posture for 45 sec. Finally, the SSE was performed on the levator scapulae of the shoulder bone. In this exercise, the subject adopted the correct sitting posture on a chair and depressed the shoulders by fixing the hand intended to be extended behind the sheet under the hip. The subject then adopted a posture (flexion + side flexion + rotation couple motion) to extend the levator scapulae to the fullest and maintained it for 45 sec. To measure pulmonary functions, a CardioTouch 3000s (Bionet; Seoul, South Korea) was used while the subjects remained seated. The forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) were measured, while the peak expiratory flow (PEF) was measured to determine airway resistance. To reduce measurement error, in each case, the average of three measurements was used as the final result. Repeated one-way ANOVA was employed for statistical processing to determine the pulmonary function within each group; one-way ANOVA, meanwhile, was conducted to compare the groups themselves. The Bonferroni correction method was used as a post hoc test. The current study used SPSS 12.0 for Windows for statistical processing, and the significance level α was set to 0.05.

RESULTS

Comparisons within each of the groups showed that FVC, FEV1, and PEF increased significantly (p < 0.05). Among the study groups, FVC was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG after six weeks; FEV1 was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG and SSEG after four and six weeks (p < 0.05); and PEF was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG and SSEG after six weeks (p < 0.05) (Table 1 ).
Table 1.

Variation of FVC, FEV1, and PEF between groups

DISCUSSION

This study conducted experiments three times a week for six weeks to identify the effects of TJM and SSEs on pulmonary function in patients with chronic neck pain. Jeong11) reported that the ROM in the jointed part of the neck and spine and chronic neck pain show a high correlation. In other words, if the ROM in the jointed part of the neck and spine increases, the VAS and neck disability index also increase in patients with chronic neck pain. Cleland et al.12) reported that manipulation of the upper vertebrae (C7 to T2) and middle vertebrae (T3 to T10) exercises resulted in a statistically significant decline in chronic neck pain. Sterling et al.13) reported that the VAS declined from 5.8 cm to 2.8 cm after applying the joint mobilization technique. Hurwitz et al.14) suggested that a three-week program of electrical therapy and joint mobilization was more effective than joint exercise in patients with subacute neck pain. Kim et al.15) noted that the range of motion of the upper spine was an effective intervention for dynamic stability among chronic neck pain patients In active exercise therapies, extension is effective in increasing the ROM in soft tissues and the ROM in reduced narrow ROM structures16). Jung17) reported that an eight-week home-based cervical exercise program changes the curves in the right side. Omer et al.18) also asserted that mobilization and stretching relaxation techniques are effective for reducing and increasing the ROM of computer users who exhibit cervical and trapezius pain. Yang19) showed that application of thoracic vertebra extension exercises resulted in statistically significant increases in VAS, spinal length (C7 to S3), and flexibility of thoracic vertebra extension. Seo20) found that male office workers who complained of cervical pain experienced a minor level of improvement after application of upper thoracic vertebra exercises, but this result was not statistically significant. As mentioned, comparisons of the individuals within TJMG, SSEG, and TJMSSEG showed that FVC, FEV1, and PEF had increased significantly; Among the study groups, FVC was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG after six weeks; FEV1 was significantly higher in TJMSSEG than in TJMG and SSEG after four and six weeks; and PEF was significantly higher in the TJMSSEG than in the TJMG and SSEG, after six weeks. Chronic neck pain patients with thoracic kyphosis develop round shoulders that stem from increased thoracic kyphosis; this triggers decreases in vital capacity and thoracic cavity capacity. This is because thoracic joint mobilization or self-stretching exercises for the spine improve limited movements of the spine, recover facet joint sliding, and normalize the articular capsule, thereby decreasing kyphosis and enhancing the flexibility of thoracic extension. Therefore, it is considered that increased mobility of the thorax ameliorates pulmonary functions. In addition, pulmonary functions were better in TJMSSEG than in TJMG and SSEG after six weeks because the simultaneous performance of thoracic joint mobilization (a therapist’s passive manual therapy) and self-stretching exercise (performed by patients themselves) was effective in recovering facet joint sliding of the spine and normalizing the articular capsule. This study had some limitations. The main one is the limited number of subjects with chronic neck pain, resulting in difficulties generalizing the results. Furthermore, this study failed to measure range of motion of thoracic kyphosis and the flexibility of spinal extension. Future studies will be required to identify the effects of TJM and SSEs on the pulmonary functions of patients with stroke.
  9 in total

1.  Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity.

Authors:  M Sterling; G Jull; A Wright
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2001-05

2.  The initial effects of a cervical spine manipulative physiotherapy treatment on the pain and dysfunction of lateral epicondylalgia.

Authors:  Bill Vicenzino; David Collins; Anthony Wright
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  The influence of different sitting positions on cervical and lumbar posture.

Authors:  K M Black; P McClure; M Polansky
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Force perception before and after maximal voluntary contraction.

Authors:  J L Gooch; J Randle
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1993-04

5.  Multimodal group rehabilitation compared to usual care for patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Julie Sarah Hudson; Cormac Gerard Ryan
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 6.  Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E L Hurwitz; P D Aker; A H Adams; W C Meeker; P G Shekelle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The immediate effects of upper thoracic translatoric spinal manipulation on cervical pain and range of motion: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  John Krauss; Doug Creighton; Jonathan D Ely; Joanna Podlewska-Ely
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

8.  The audible pop from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and its relation to short-term outcomes in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; Timothy W Flynn; John D Childs; Sarah Eberhart
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

9.  The use of an oral exercise device in the treatment of muscular TMD.

Authors:  Edward G Grace; Eleni Sarlani; Britt Reid; Britt Read
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.020

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Effects of cervical sustained natural apophyseal glide on forward head posture and respiratory function.

Authors:  Se-Yoon Kim; Nan-Soo Kim; Laurentius Jongsoon Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  The effect of short-term upper thoracic self-mobilization using a Kaltenborn wedge on pain and cervical dysfunction in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Hyung-Taek Oh; Gak Hwangbo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-04-13

3.  Thoracic Deformity Correction and Changes of Vital Capacity, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second, and Expiratory Flow in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Five Years or More after Posterior Spinal Fusion with Thoracoplasty.

Authors:  Tsutomu Akazawa; Masahiro Iinuma; Shingo Kuroya; Yoshiaki Torii; Tasuku Umehara; Kenichi Murakami; Toshiaki Kotani; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Shohei Minami; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuhide Inage; Kazuki Fujimoto; Yasuhiro Shiga; Junichi Nakamura; Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Wataru Saito; Seiji Ohtori; Hisateru Niki
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-01

4.  Does mobilisation of the thoracic spine using mechanical massage affect diaphragmatic excursion in individuals with thoracic hyperkyphosis?

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Ui-Jae Hwang; Sun-Hee Ahn; Jun-Hee Kim; Oh-Yun Kwon
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.456

5.  Correlation between basic physical fitness and pulmonary function in Korean children and adolescents: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Ju Yong Bae; Ki Sung Jang; Sunghwun Kang; Don Hee Han; Wonho Yang; Ki Ok Shin
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Effect of thoracic and cervical joint mobilization on pulmonary function in stroke patients.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Jang; Hyun-Soo Bang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-01-30

7.  Effect of thoracic manipulation and deep craniocervical flexor training on pain, mobility, strength, and disability of the neck of patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kwan-Woo Lee; Won-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-01-30

8.  Effects of shoulder stabilization exercise on pain and function in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Youna Lee; Mary Myong Sook Shin; Wanhee Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-12-28

9.  The effect of thoracic region self-mobilization on chest expansion and pulmonary function.

Authors:  Ju-Hyeon Jung; Dong-Chul Moon
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  The effect of thoracic spine mobilization and stabilization exercise on the muscular strength and flexibility of the trunk of chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Seong-Rae Yang; Kyung Kim; Sun-Ja Park; Kyung Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.