Literature DB >> 19119394

The immediate effects of upper thoracic translatoric spinal manipulation on cervical pain and range of motion: a randomized clinical trial.

John Krauss1, Doug Creighton, Jonathan D Ely, Joanna Podlewska-Ely.   

Abstract

This study examined the effect of translatoric spinal manipulation (TSM) on cervical pain and cervical active motion restriction when applied to upper thoracic (T1-T4) segments. Active cervical rotation range of motion was measured re- and post-intervention with a cervical inclinometer (CROM), and cervical pain status was monitored before and after manipulation with a Faces Pain Scale. Study participants included a sample of convenience that included 32 patients referred to physical therapy with complaints of pain in the mid-cervical region and restricted active cervical rotation. Twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group and ten were assigned to the control group. Pre- and post-intervention cervical range of motion and pain scale measurements were taken by a physical therapist assistant who was blinded to group assignment. The experimental group received TSM to hypomobile upper thoracic segments. The control group received no intervention. Paired t-tests were used to analyze within-group changes in cervical rotation and pain, and a 2-way repeated-measure ANOVA was used to analyze between-group differences in cervical rotation and pain. Significance was accepted at p = 0.05. Significant changes that exceeded the MDC(95) were detected for cervical rotation both within group and between groups with the TSM group demonstrating increased mean (SD) in right rotation of 8.23 degrees (7.41 degrees ) and left rotation of 7.09 degrees (5.83 degrees ). Pain levels perceived during post-intervention cervical rotation showed significant improvement during right rotation for patients experiencing pain during bilateral rotation only (p=.05). This study supports the hypothesis that spinal manipulation applied to the upper thoracic spine (T1-T4 motion segments) significantly increases cervical rotation ROM and may reduce cervical pain at end range rotation for patients experiencing pain during bilateral cervical rotation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Manipulation; Pain; Range of Motion; Thoracic Spine; Translatoric Spinal Manipulation

Year:  2008        PMID: 19119394      PMCID: PMC2565124          DOI: 10.1179/106698108790818530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  27 in total

1.  Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  J J Triano
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Reduced mobility in the cervico-thoracic motion segment--a risk factor for musculoskeletal neck-shoulder pain: a two-year prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  S Norlander; B A Gustavsson; J Lindell; B Nordgren
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1997-09

3.  Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; John D Childs; Julie M Fritz; Julie M Whitman; Sarah L Eberhart
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-12-01

4.  Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; John D Childs; Meghann McRae; Jessica A Palmer; Thomas Stowell
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-05

5.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; S L Young; M G Woodbury; K Fryday-Field
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-08

7.  The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties.

Authors:  Daiva Bieri; Robert A Reeve; David G Champion; Louise Addicoat; John B Ziegler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Palpation of the upper thoracic spine: an observer reliability study.

Authors:  Henrik Wulff Christensen; Werner Vach; Kirstin Vach; Claus Manniche; Torben Haghfelt; Lisbet Hartvigsen; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?

Authors:  J Kim Ross; David E Bereznick; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults.

Authors:  Eun Joo Kim; MaryBeth Tank Buschmann
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.837

View more
  20 in total

1.  A comparison of two non-thrust mobilization techniques applied to the C7 segment in patients with restricted and painful cervical rotation.

Authors:  Doug Creighton; Mark Gruca; Douglas Marsh; Nancy Murphy
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-11

2.  Ultrasound analysis of the vertebral artery during non-thrust cervical translatoric spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Doug Creighton; Melodie Kondratek; John Krauss; Peter Huijbregts; Harvey Qu
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Fatemeh Yazdi; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Anita Gross; Maurits Van Tulder; Lina Santaguida; Joel Gagnier; Carlo Ammendolia; Trish Dryden; Steve Doucette; Becky Skidmore; Raymond Daniel; Thomas Ostermann; Sophia Tsouros
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  The effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation for the management of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ronald F Walser; Brent B Meserve; Thomas R Boucher
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

5.  A CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR PHYSICAL THERAPISTS TREATING ATHLETES WITH PROTRACTED RECOVERY FOLLOWING A CONCUSSION.

Authors:  Mark Lundblad
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04

6.  Comparison of range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation versus the side-bending rotation test in individuals with and without hyperlaxity.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Austin B Craven; Jeremy Jordan; Rhane Martin
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-10-03

7.  Safe physiotherapy interventions in large cervical disc herniations.

Authors:  Keramat Ullah Keramat; Aisling Gaughran
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-18

8.  Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jodi L Young; Doug Walker; Shane Snyder; Kelly Daly
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-08

9.  Immediate effects of a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rob Sillevis; Joshua Cleland; Madeleine Hellman; Kristina Beekhuizen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

10.  Regional interdependence and manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Amy McDevitt; Jodi Young; Paul Mintken; Josh Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.