Literature DB >> 26504292

The effect of thoracic region self-mobilization on chest expansion and pulmonary function.

Ju-Hyeon Jung1, Dong-Chul Moon1.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to determine the effects of thoracic region self-mobilization on chest expansion and pulmonary function in healthy adults. [Subjects] Nineteen healthy adults were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (n = 8) or a control group (n = 11). [Methods] Subjects in the intervention group performed self-mobilization of the thoracic region 3 times per week for 6 weeks (18 sessions). The outcome measures included chest expansion when breathing, pulmonary function, and predicted pulmonary function.
[Results] There was a significant difference in chest expansion between the intervention group and the control group. However, there was no significant difference in pulmonary function between the intervention group and the control group.
[Conclusion] Thoracic region self-mobilization may be beneficial for increasing chest expansion in healthy adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest expansion; Pulmonary function; Thoracic self-mobilization

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504292      PMCID: PMC4616093          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.2779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

In modern society, the incidence of cervical lordosis and thoracic and lumbar kyphosis is increasing, because many people maintain a fixed posture for long periods and number of aged people is increasing. An increase in thoracic kyphosis causes restrictions in chest expansion and respiratory muscle weakness, thereby reducing lung capacity and the thoracic cavity size and deforming vertebral column alignment1,2,3). Previous studies have investigated the use of thoracic joint mobilization and thoracic flexibility exercises to improve deformations of the chest and vertebrae and thereby enhance pulmonary function1, 4). These interventions enhanced pulmonary function and thoracic mobility and improved respiratory muscle function, chest expansion, and diaphragm movement by reducing the stiffness of the inter-vertebral discs and surrounding tissues and by improving vertebral extensor muscle stretch and endurance with thoracic flexibility exercises1, 4). As reported in previous studies, chest mobilization exercises and stretching exercises increase thoracic vertebral mobility, chest expansion, and lung capacity. However, these exercises required firsthand therapeutic application by therapists and cannot be easily performed by the subjects in a non-clinical environment5). Therefore, the present study examined self-mobilization of thoracic vertebrae in healthy adults and investigated the effect of these exercises on pulmonary function and chest expansion.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects of this study were 19 healthy adults who understood the purpose of the study and provided written consent to participate. Those diagnosed with neurological findings and had undergone operations, or were receiving surgical treatment, or taking medicines on a regular basis to relieve pain, were excluded from the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Catholic University of Pusan and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki (1975, revised 1983). The subjects were assigned to one of two groups, the thoracic region self-mobilization group (TSMG; 2 males and 6 females) or the control group (CG; 5 males and 6 females). None of the subjects showed restrictive pulmonary disease or obstructive pulmonary disease, as determined by a spirometer pretest. Age, height, and weight were 22.50 ± 1.06 years, 164.25 ± 10.60 cm, and 60.12 ± 13.35 kg, respectively in the TSMG, and were 22.36 ± 3.26 years, 165.50 ± 7.37 cm, and 65.09 ± 14.90 kg, respectively in the CG. To measure chest expansion when breathing, the subject’s chest wall was measured with a tapeline in an upright sitting position. Chest expansion was calculated using the difference in chest wall circumference during the state of maximal expiration and maximal inspiration6, 7). A spirometer (Pony Fx, COSMED, Italy) was used to measure pulmonary function. Using a maximal-effort expiratory spirogram, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1,), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and predicted pulmonary function (pred FVC, pred FEV1, pred FEV1/FVC, pred PEF) were measured while the subjects were in an upright position1). Thoracic region self-mobilization exercise was performed by the intervention group using a method modified and a self-mobilization tool from previous studies for 20 minutes, three times per week for 6 weeks5). If a participant felt pain or inconvenience, the self-mobilization tool was moved toward the transverse process of the spine or the rib, and the exercise was performed again5). Before the experiment, the participants were requested to practice 2–3 times to become familiar with the exercise5). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows (ver.18.0). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences between the two groups (TSMG and CG). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the two groups at the significance level of (α) = 0.05. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Chest expansion (axillary, sternum, low costal region) measurement results are summarized in Table 1. Comparison of pulmonary function results from the two groups showed no significant differences between group variations or within group variations (p > 0.05).
Table 1.

Within-group and between-group comparisons for outcome measures

TSMG (n=8)Difference (post-pre)zaCG (n=11)Difference (post-pre)zazb


Pre-testPost-testPre-testPost-test
Ax4.31±2.106.18±2.011.87±1.45−2.31*4.77±3.243.06±0.79−1.70±3.67−1.68−2.99*
St3.18±1.095.18±1.362.00±1.53−1.68*3.63±2.852.90±1.54−0.72±2.48−1.13−2.28*
LC5.06±2.736.12±1.951.06±1.74−1.553.36±2.372.07±1.38−1.29±1.49−2.53*−2.74*

aWithin-group comparison, bbetween-group comparison, Ax: Axillary region, St: Sternum region, LC: Low costal region, Unit; cm,*p < 0.05, all results presented as mean ± SD.

aWithin-group comparison, bbetween-group comparison, Ax: Axillary region, St: Sternum region, LC: Low costal region, Unit; cm,*p < 0.05, all results presented as mean ± SD.

DISCUSSION

Chest expansion, respiratory function, and thoracic vertebral pain are adversely affected by reduced thoracic vertebral mobility and structural changes in the thoracic and lumbar angles8, 9). Although many interventions have been applied in previous studies to address these issues, those interventions have shortcomings because they require firsthand application by therapists1, 4). Therefore, the present study aimed to verify whether active thoracic vertebrae self-mobilization methods are sufficient5) and to investigate changes in chest expansion and pulmonary function caused by thoracic region self-mobilization. Although engaging in thoracic joint mobilization and self-stretching exercise for 6 weeks improved pulmonary function in a previous study1), another study showed no improvement in pulmonary function after chest region respiratory muscle stretching exercise for 4 weeks7). Therefore, the argument that interventions applied to the thoracic region are involved in pulmonary function improvement is controversial. In the present study, no significant change in pulmonary function was observed. This may be attributable to the fact that the intervention was applied to healthy subjects, who were relatively less affected by the intervention. However, the intervention applied in the present study resulted in larger increases in axillary region and sternum region measurements, than in previous studies in which respiratory muscle stretch gymnastics were applied7). Interestingly, previous studies have reported that changes in low costal region measurements were relatively larger than changes in axillary region and sternum region measurements when thoracic flexibility exercise was applied. Conversely, changes in lower costal region measurements were not significantly larger in the present study4, 7). These results may be attributable to the fact that although thoracic region self-mobilization directly affected ribs 1–10, which are directly connected to the thoracic vertebrae or to the cartilage, it could not directly affect ribs 11 and 12. The control group showed a statistically significant decrease in low costal region measurements post-test. Thus, it could be indirectly concluded that if thoracic vertebrae are not mobilized, chest region muscle stiffness persists and the mobility of the muscles around the chest wall declines owing to over activation of the muscle spindles, potentially leading to respiratory disorders7, 9). Therefore, thoracic region self-mobilization is an easy intervention that can be self-applied by patients with low chest mobility in order to improve expansion capability of the entire chest region.
  5 in total

1.  Thoracic region self-mobilization: a clinical suggestion.

Authors:  Katherine D Johnson; Terry L Grindstaff
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

2.  Cross-over comparison between respiratory muscle stretch gymnastics and inspiratory muscle training.

Authors:  Hideko Minoguchi; Masato Shibuya; Tetsuo Miyagawa; Fumio Kokubu; Minehiko Yamada; Hirotaka Tanaka; Murray D Altose; Mitsuru Adachi; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.271

3.  Respiratory dysfunction in patients with chronic neck pain - influence of thoracic spine and chest mobility.

Authors:  B Wirth; M Amstalden; M Perk; U Boutellier; B K Humphreys
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-04-30

4.  Restrictive pulmonary function is more prevalent in patients with ankylosing spondylitis than in matched population controls and is associated with impaired spinal mobility: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gunnhild Berdal; Silje Halvorsen; Désirée van der Heijde; Morten Mowe; Hanne Dagfinrud
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  The Effect of Thoracic Joint Mobilization and Self-stretching Exercise on Pulmonary Functions of Patients with Chronic Neck Pain.

Authors:  Pil-Neo Hwangbo; Gak Hwangbo; Jungseo Park; Sangyong Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-11-13
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  The effect of short-term upper thoracic self-mobilization using a Kaltenborn wedge on pain and cervical dysfunction in patients with neck pain.

Authors:  Hyung-Taek Oh; Gak Hwangbo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-04-13

2.  Does mobilisation of the thoracic spine using mechanical massage affect diaphragmatic excursion in individuals with thoracic hyperkyphosis?

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Ui-Jae Hwang; Sun-Hee Ahn; Jun-Hee Kim; Oh-Yun Kwon
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.456

3.  Optimizing physical therapy for ankylosing spondylitis: a case study in a young football player.

Authors:  José Miguel Tricás-Moreno; María Orosia Lucha-López; Ana Carmen Lucha-López; Carlos Salavera-Bordás; Concepción Vidal-Peracho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-04-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.