Literature DB >> 25432953

Effects of tailored risk communications for skin cancer prevention and detection: the PennSCAPE randomized trial.

Karen Glanz1, Kathryn Volpicelli2, Christopher Jepson2, Michael E Ming2, Lynn M Schuchter2, Katrina Armstrong3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevention and early detection measures for melanoma, such as sun avoidance and skin examinations, are important, but are practiced inconsistently. In this replication of the Project SCAPE trial, we sought to determine whether tailored print materials were more effective at improving adherence than generic print materials for patients at increased risk of skin cancer.
METHODS: Participants were randomized to receive personalized mailed communications about their skin cancer risk and recommended sun protection, or generic mailings. Participants were Caucasian adults, at moderate or high risk for skin cancer, recruited in outpatient primary care. The main outcomes were overall sun protection behaviors and specific protective behaviors including use of sunscreen, shirt, hat, sunglasses, shade, and sun avoidance; recent sunburns; and skin self-examination and provider skin examination.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two (93.2%) subjects completed the study. Six outcome variables showed significant intervention condition effects in mixed effects models: overall sun protection behavior (P = 0.025); sunscreen use (P = 0.026); use of sunglasses (P = 0.011); sunburns in the past three months (P = 0.033); recency of last skin self-exam (P = 0.017); and frequency of skin exams by health care provider (P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Relative to generic communications, tailored risk communications resulted in improved adherence to six skin cancer protective behaviors, including a composite sun protection behavior measure, sunburns, and health care provider skin examinations. IMPACT: Tailored interventions can be more effective in improving patient prevention behaviors than nontailored, generic information for patients at moderate to high risk of skin cancer. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432953      PMCID: PMC4323936          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  23 in total

1.  Why you should know about melanoma. American Cancer Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Plast Surg Nurs       Date:  1999

2.  Presentation and detection of invasive melanoma in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Michelle McPherson; Mark Elwood; Dallas R English; Peter D Baade; Philippa H Youl; Joanne F Aitken
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Targeting children through school-based education and policy strategies: comprehensive cancer control activities in melanoma prevention.

Authors:  Julie S Townsend; Beth Pinkerton; Sharon A McKenna; Sue M Higgins; Eric Tai; C Brooke Steele; Susan R Derrick; Christine Brown
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Christina N Benac; Melissa S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Prevalence of sunburn, sun protection, and indoor tanning behaviors among Americans: review from national surveys and case studies of 3 states.

Authors:  David B Buller; Vilma Cokkinides; H Irene Hall; Anne M Hartman; Mona Saraiya; Eric Miller; Lisa Paddock; Karen Glanz
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up.

Authors:  Adèle C Green; Gail M Williams; Valerie Logan; Geoffrey M Strutton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education.

Authors:  Johannes Brug; Anke Oenema; Marci Campbell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Multiple skin cancer risk behaviors in the U.S. population.

Authors:  Elliot J Coups; Sharon L Manne; Carolyn J Heckman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Validity of covering-up sun-protection habits: Association of observations and self-report.

Authors:  David L O'Riordan; Eric Nehl; Peter Gies; Lucja Bundy; Kristen Burgess; Erica Davis; Karen Glanz
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  A randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention messages for adults: Project SCAPE.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Elinor R Schoenfeld; Alana Steffen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  12 in total

1.  Mediation analysis of decisional balance, sun avoidance and sunscreen use in the precontemplation and preparation stages for sun protection.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Wayne F Velicer; Colleen Redding
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2015-06-24

2.  Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Self-reported sunscreen use and urinary benzophenone-3 concentrations in the United States: NHANES 2003-2006 and 2009-2012.

Authors:  Rachel D Zamoiski; Elizabeth K Cahoon; D Michal Freedman; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Real-time sun protection decisions in first-degree relatives of melanoma patients.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Elyse Shuk; Elizabeth Schofield; Rebecca Loeb; Susan Holland; Jack Burkhalter; Yuelin Li
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  The Effects of Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Risk Communication on Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior Intentions: a Randomized Trial of Average-Risk Adults.

Authors:  Carrie A Miller; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Maria D Thomson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Sun Protection Belief Clusters: Analysis of Amazon Mechanical Turk Data.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Julie B Schnur; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Association between a 46-SNP Polygenic Risk Score and melanoma risk in Dutch patients with familial melanoma.

Authors:  Thomas P Potjer; Tara W J van der Grinten; Inge M M Lakeman; Sander H Bollen; Mar Rodríguez-Girondo; Mark M Iles; Jennifer H Barrett; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Nelleke A Gruis; Christi J van Asperen; Nienke van der Stoep
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  UV imaging reveals facial areas that are prone to skin cancer are disproportionately missed during sunscreen application.

Authors:  Harry Pratt; Kareem Hassanin; Lee D Troughton; Gabriela Czanner; Yalin Zheng; Austin G McCormick; Kevin J Hamill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessing the Incremental Contribution of Common Genomic Variants to Melanoma Risk Prediction in Two Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Anne E Cust; Martin Drummond; Peter A Kanetsky; Alisa M Goldstein; Jennifer H Barrett; Stuart MacGregor; Matthew H Law; Mark M Iles; Minh Bui; John L Hopper; Myriam Brossard; Florence Demenais; John C Taylor; Clive Hoggart; Kevin M Brown; Maria Teresa Landi; Julia A Newton-Bishop; Graham J Mann; D Timothy Bishop
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 8.551

10.  Risk Prediction Models for Melanoma: A Systematic Review on the Heterogeneity in Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Isabelle Kaiser; Annette B Pfahlberg; Wolfgang Uter; Markus V Heppt; Marit B Veierød; Olaf Gefeller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.