Literature DB >> 31997146

The Effects of Personalizing Colorectal Cancer Risk Communication on Risk Perceptions and Health Behavior Intentions: a Randomized Trial of Average-Risk Adults.

Carrie A Miller1, Jennifer Elston Lafata2, Maria D Thomson3.   

Abstract

Risk assessment tools may help individuals gauge cancer risk and motivate lifestyle and screening behavior changes. Despite the evermore common availability of such tools, little is known about their potential utility in average-risk population approaches to cancer prevention. We evaluated the effects of providing personalized (vs. generic) information concerning colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors on average-risk individuals' risk perceptions and intentions to engage in three risk-reducing behaviors: CRC screening, diet, and physical activity. Further, we explored whether the receipt of CRC-specific risk assessment feedback influenced individuals' breast cancer risk perceptions and mammography intentions. Using an online survey, N = 419 survey respondents aged 50-75 with no personal or family history of CRC were randomized to receive an average estimate of CRC lifetime risk and risk factor information that was either personalized (treatment) or invariant/non-personalized (control). Respondent risk perceptions and behavioral intentions were ascertained before and after risk assessment administration. No differences were observed in risk perceptions or behavioral intentions by study arm. However, regardless of study arm, CRC screening intentions significantly increased after risk assessment feedback was provided. This occurred despite a significant reduction in risk perceptions. Results support the role simple cancer risk assessment information could play in promoting screening behaviors while improving the accuracy of cancer risk perceptions. Providing cancer risk assessment information may decrease individuals' perceptions of cancer risk to more realistic levels while simultaneously facilitating screening intentions among an average-risk population, regardless of whether provided risk information is personalized.
© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral intention; Colorectal cancer; Risk communication; Risk perception

Year:  2021        PMID: 31997146      PMCID: PMC7387146          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01694-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  16 in total

Review 1.  Hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Helen Meissner; Carrie Klabunde; Barbara K Rimer; Dennis J Ahnen; Roshan Bastani; Margaret T Mandelson; Marion R Nadel; Sherri Sheinfeld-Gorin; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Tailored computer-based cancer risk communication: correcting colorectal cancer risk perception.

Authors:  Karen M Emmons; Mei Wong; Elaine Puleo; Neil Weinstein; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

4.  An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Laura E Zajac; Stephanie R Land; Bruce S Ling
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-08-18

Review 5.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  A G K Edwards; R Evans; J Dundon; S Haigh; K Hood; G J Elwyn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  American Cancer Society Guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity.

Authors:  Lawrence H Kushi; Colleen Doyle; Marji McCullough; Cheryl L Rock; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elisa V Bandera; Susan Gapstur; Alpa V Patel; Kimberly Andrews; Ted Gansler
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Harvard report on cancer prevention volume 4: Harvard Cancer Risk Index. Risk Index Working Group, Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  G A Colditz; K A Atwood; K Emmons; R R Monson; W C Willett; D Trichopoulos; D J Hunter
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Colon cancer: risk perceptions and risk communication.

Authors:  Neil D Weinstein; Kathy Atwood; Elaine Puleo; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

9.  Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility.

Authors:  Andrew N Freedman; Martha L Slattery; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Gordon Willis; Bette J Cann; David Pee; Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The (ir)relevance of framing nutrition education messages.

Authors:  Johannes Brug; Robert A C Ruiter; Patricia van Assema
Journal:  Nutr Health       Date:  2003
View more
  2 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer lifetime risk accuracy and behavior change intentions before and after risk assessment.

Authors:  Carrie A Miller; Andrew J Barnes; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Maria D Thomson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Effect of WeChat-Based Health Education Combined with Satir Model on Self-Management Behaviors and Social Adaptation in Colorectal Cancer Patients during the Perioperative Period.

Authors:  Limin Feng; Weina Wang; Meiying Wu; Huili Ma
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.