PURPOSE: Mortality is high in patients with locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially in those with residual tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The aim of this study was to determine if pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT staging and pathological findings after NAC could together allow stratification of patients into prognostic groups. METHODS: Initial staging with (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed prospectively in 85 consecutive patients with stage II/III TNBC. Correlations between PET findings and disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined. In patients without distant metastases on PET staging, the impact of pathological response to NAC on DSS was examined. Patterns of recurrence were also analysed. RESULTS: (18)F-DG PET/CT revealed distant metastases in 11 of 85 patients (12.9 %). Among 74 M0 patients, 23 (31.1 %) showed a pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery, while 51 had residual invasive disease (no pCR). DSS differed considerably among the three groups of patients (log-rank P < .001): among patients with occult metastases on baseline PET/CT, 2-year DSS was 18.2 %, and among patients without initial metastases on PET/CT, 5-year DSS was 61.3 % in patients without pCR after NAC and 95.2 % in those with pCR. Of the 51 patients who did not achieve pCR, 21 relapsed (17 developed distant metastases). The sites of distant recurrence were: lung/pleura (nine patients), brain (eight patients), liver (six patients), distant lymph nodes (six patients) and bone (five patients). CONCLUSION: In patients with clinical stage II/III TNBC, (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings at initial staging and pathological response at the end of NAC allow three groups of patients with quite different prognoses to be defined. Extraskeletal recurrences predominated. Specific follow-up strategies in patients with TNBC who do not achieve pCR deserve investigation.
PURPOSE: Mortality is high in patients with locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially in those with residual tumour after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The aim of this study was to determine if pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT staging and pathological findings after NAC could together allow stratification of patients into prognostic groups. METHODS: Initial staging with (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed prospectively in 85 consecutive patients with stage II/III TNBC. Correlations between PET findings and disease-specific survival (DSS) were examined. In patients without distant metastases on PET staging, the impact of pathological response to NAC on DSS was examined. Patterns of recurrence were also analysed. RESULTS: (18)F-DG PET/CT revealed distant metastases in 11 of 85 patients (12.9 %). Among 74 M0 patients, 23 (31.1 %) showed a pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery, while 51 had residual invasive disease (no pCR). DSS differed considerably among the three groups of patients (log-rank P < .001): among patients with occult metastases on baseline PET/CT, 2-year DSS was 18.2 %, and among patients without initial metastases on PET/CT, 5-year DSS was 61.3 % in patients without pCR after NAC and 95.2 % in those with pCR. Of the 51 patients who did not achieve pCR, 21 relapsed (17 developed distant metastases). The sites of distant recurrence were: lung/pleura (nine patients), brain (eight patients), liver (six patients), distant lymph nodes (six patients) and bone (five patients). CONCLUSION: In patients with clinical stage II/III TNBC, (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings at initial staging and pathological response at the end of NAC allow three groups of patients with quite different prognoses to be defined. Extraskeletal recurrences predominated. Specific follow-up strategies in patients with TNBC who do not achieve pCR deserve investigation.
Authors: M Pennant; Y Takwoingi; L Pennant; C Davenport; A Fry-Smith; A Eisinga; L Andronis; T Arvanitis; J Deeks; C Hyde Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: David Groheux; Elif Hindié; Sylvie Giacchetti; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Frederique Berger; Pascal Merlet; Anne de Roquancourt; Patricia de Cremoux; Michel Marty; Mathieu Hatt; Marc Espié Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nancy U Lin; Ann Vanderplas; Melissa E Hughes; Richard L Theriault; Stephen B Edge; Yu-Ning Wong; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: B Gerber; S Loibl; H Eidtmann; M Rezai; P A Fasching; H Tesch; H Eggemann; I Schrader; K Kittel; C Hanusch; R Kreienberg; C Solbach; C Jackisch; G Kunz; J U Blohmer; J Huober; M Hauschild; V Nekljudova; M Untch; G von Minckwitz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Hiroko Masuda; Keith A Baggerly; Ying Wang; Ya Zhang; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Vicente Valero; Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Naoto T Ueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ana María García Vicente; Ángel Soriano Castrejón; Jesús Fernando López-Fidalgo; Mariano Amo-Salas; María Del Mar Muñoz Sanchez; Ruth Álvarez Cabellos; Ruth Espinosa Aunión Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Katja Pinker; Christopher C Riedl; Leonard Ong; Maxine Jochelson; Gary A Ulaner; Heather McArthur; Maura Dickler; Mithad Gönen; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher C Riedl; Katja Pinker; Gary A Ulaner; Leonard T Ong; Pascal Baltzer; Maxine S Jochelson; Heather L McArthur; Mithat Gönen; Maura Dickler; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 9.236