Literature DB >> 24136883

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in 678 triple-negative primary breast cancers; results from the geparquinto study (GBG 44).

B Gerber1, S Loibl, H Eidtmann, M Rezai, P A Fasching, H Tesch, H Eggemann, I Schrader, K Kittel, C Hanusch, R Kreienberg, C Solbach, C Jackisch, G Kunz, J U Blohmer, J Huober, M Hauschild, V Nekljudova, M Untch, G von Minckwitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant epirubicin, (E) cyclophosphamide (C) and docetaxel containing chemotherapy with and without the addition of bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated cT1c-4d TNBC represented a stratified subset of the 1948 participants of the HER2-negative part of the GeparQuinto trial. Patients were randomized to receive four cycles EC (90/600 mg/m(2); q3w) followed by four cycles docetaxel (100 mg/m(2); q3w) each with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg; q3w) added to chemotherapy.
RESULTS: TNBC patients were randomized to chemotherapy without (n = 340) or with bevacizumab (n = 323). pCR (ypT0 ypN0, primary end point) rates were 27.9% without and 39.3% with bevacizumab (P = 0.003). According to other pCR definitions, the addition of bevacizumab increased the pCR rate from 30.9% to 41.8% (ypT0 ypN0/+; P = 0.004), 36.2% to 46.4% (ypT0/is ypN0/+; P = 0.009) and 32.9% to 43.3% (ypT0/is ypN0; P = 0.007). Bevacizumab treatment [OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.42; P = 0.002], lower tumor stage (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.24-4.54; P = 0.009) and grade 3 tumors (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.48; P = 0.009) were confirmed as independent predictors of higher pCR in multivariate logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in TNBC significantly increases pCR rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bevacizumab; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pathological response rate; triple-negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136883     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  51 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab in early breast cancer (NSABP B-40 [NRG Oncology]): secondary outcomes of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Gong Tang; Priya Rastogi; Charles E Geyer; Qing Liu; André Robidoux; Luis Baez-Diaz; Adam M Brufsky; Rita S Mehta; Louis Fehrenbacher; James A Young; Francis M Senecal; Rakesh Gaur; Richard G Margolese; Paul T Adams; Howard M Gross; Joseph P Costantino; Soonmyung Paik; Sandra M Swain; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Hai-Jeon Yoon; Keon Wook Kang; In Kook Chun; Nariya Cho; Seock-Ah Im; Sunjoo Jeong; Song Lee; Kyeong Cheon Jung; Yun-Sang Lee; Jae Min Jeong; Dong Soo Lee; June-Key Chung; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Triple-negative breast cancer patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center in phase I trials: improved outcomes with combination chemotherapy and targeted agents.

Authors:  Prasanth Ganesan; Stacy Moulder; J Jack Lee; Filip Janku; Vicente Valero; Ralph G Zinner; Aung Naing; Siqing Fu; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David Hong; Bettzy Stephen; Philip Stephens; Roman Yelensky; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Razelle Kurzrock; Jennifer J Wheler
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 5.  Bevacizumab: a review of its use in advanced cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Clinical relevance and concordance of HER2 status in local and central testing-an analysis of 1581 HER2-positive breast carcinomas over 12 years.

Authors:  Berit M Pfitzner; Bianca Lederer; Judith Lindner; Christine Solbach; Knut Engels; Mahdi Rezai; Karel Dohnal; Hans Tesch; Martin L Hansmann; Christoph Salat; Michaela Beer; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter Sinn; Agnes Bankfalvi; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Gunter von Minckwitz; Bruno V Sinn; Ralf Kronenwett; Karsten Weber; Carsten Denkert; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Considerations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas McAndrew; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  J Target Ther Cancer       Date:  2018-02-14

8.  Baseline factors predicting a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with implications for non-surgical management of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  R F D van la Parra; A B Tadros; C M Checka; G M Rauch; A Lucci; B D Smith; S Krishnamurthy; V Valero; W T Yang; H M Kuerer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: New Biomarker Approaches and Concepts.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Bruno Valentin Sinn; Yasmin Issa; Berit Maria Müller; Andrea Maisch; Michael Untch; Gunter von Minckwitz; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Prognostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT staging and of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  D Groheux; S Giacchetti; M Delord; A de Roquancourt; P Merlet; A S Hamy; M Espié; E Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.