| Literature DB >> 25431271 |
Ernst T Scholten1, Pim A de Jong2, Bartjan de Hoop3, Rob van Klaveren4, Saskia van Amelsvoort-van de Vorst3, Matthijs Oudkerk5, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart6, Harry J de Koning7, Carlijn M van der Aalst8, René M Vernhout7, Harry J M Groen9, Jan-Willem J Lammers10, Bram van Ginneken11, Colin Jacobs12, Willem P T M Mali3, Nanda Horeweg8, Carla Weenink13, Erik Thunnissen14, Mathias Prokop15, Hester A Gietema3.
Abstract
Pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs) have a high likelihood of malignancy, but are often indolent. A conservative treatment approach may therefore be suitable. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether close follow-up of SSNs with computed tomography may be a safe approach. The study population consisted of participants of the Dutch-Belgian lung cancer screening trial (Nederlands Leuvens Longkanker Screenings Onderzoek; NELSON). All SSNs detected during the trial were included in this analysis. Retrospectively, all persistent SSNs and SSNs that were resected after first detection were segmented using dedicated software, and maximum diameter, volume and mass were measured. Mass doubling time (MDT) was calculated. In total 7135 volunteers were included in the current analysis. 264 (3.3%) SSNs in 234 participants were detected during the trial. 147 (63%) of these SSNs in 126 participants disappeared at follow-up, leaving 117 persistent or directly resected SSNs in 108 (1.5%) participants available for analysis. The median follow-up time was 95 months (range 20-110 months). 33 (28%) SSNs were resected and 28 of those were (pre-) invasive. None of the non-resected SSNs progressed into a clinically relevant malignancy. Persistent SSNs rarely developed into clinically manifest malignancies unexpectedly. Close follow-up with computed tomography may be a safe option to monitor changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25431271 DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00005914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir J ISSN: 0903-1936 Impact factor: 16.671