Literature DB >> 30457486

A Decision Analysis of Follow-up and Treatment Algorithms for Nonsolid Pulmonary Nodules.

Mark M Hammer1, Lauren L Palazzo1, Andrew L Eckel1, Eduardo M Barbosa1, Chung Yin Kong1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate management strategies and treatment options for patients with ground-glass nodules (GGNs) by using decision-analysis models. Materials and Methods A simulation was developed for 1 000 000 hypothetical patients with GGNs undergoing follow-up per the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) recommendations. The initial age range was 55-75 years (mean, 64 years). Nodules could grow and develop solid components over time. Clinically significant malignancy rates were calibrated to data from the National Lung Screening Trial. Annual versus 3-year-interval follow-up of Lung-RADS category 2 nodules was compared, and different treatment strategies were tested (stereotactic body radiation therapy, surgery, and no therapy). Results Overall, 2.3% (22 584 of 1 000 000) of nodules were clinically significant malignancies; 6.3% (62 559 of 1 000 000) of nodules were treated. Only 30% (18 668 of 62 559) of Lung-RADS category 4B or 4X nodules were clinically significant malignancies. The risk of clinically significant malignancy for persistent nonsolid nodules after baseline was higher than Lung-RADS estimates for categories 2 and 3 (3% vs <1% and 1%-2%, respectively). Overall survival (OS) at 10 years was 72% (527 827 of 737 306; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71%, 72%) with annual follow-up and 71% (526 507 of 737 306; 95% CI: 71%, 72%) with 3-year-interval follow-up (P < .01). At 10 years, OS among patients whose nodules progressed to Lung-RADS category 4B or 4X was 80% after radiation therapy (49 945 of 62 559; 95% CI: 80%, 80%), 79% after surgery (49 139 of 62 559; 95% CI: 78%, 79%), and 74% after no therapy (46 512 of 62 559; 95% CI: 74%, 75%) (P < .01). Conclusion Simulation modeling suggests that the follow-up interval for evaluating ground-glass nodules can be increased from 1 year to 3 years with minimal change in outcomes. Stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrated the best outcomes compared with lobectomy and with no therapy for nonsolid nodules. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30457486      PMCID: PMC6357948          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  33 in total

1.  Smoking and lung cancer survival: the role of comorbidity and treatment.

Authors:  C Martin Tammemagi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Michael Simoff; Paul Kvale
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Development, calibration, and validation of a U.S. white male population-based simulation model of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chin Hur; Tristan J Hayeck; Jennifer M Yeh; Ethan M Richards; Ethan B Richards; Stuart J Spechler; G Scott Gazelle; Chung Yin Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT.

Authors:  Annette McWilliams; Martin C Tammemagi; John R Mayo; Heidi Roberts; Geoffrey Liu; Kam Soghrati; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Simon Martel; Francis Laberge; Michel Gingras; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Christine D Berg; Ken Evans; Richard Finley; John Yee; John English; Paola Nasute; John Goffin; Serge Puksa; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Michael R Johnston; Daria Manos; Garth Nicholas; Glenwood D Goss; Jean M Seely; Kayvan Amjadi; Alain Tremblay; Paul Burrowes; Paul MacEachern; Rick Bhatia; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prognostic Impact of the Findings on Thin-Section Computed Tomography in Patients with Subcentimeter Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Aritoshi Hattori; Takeshi Matsunaga; Takuo Hayashi; Kazuya Takamochi; Shiaki Oh; Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 6.  Lung cancer screening overdiagnosis: reports of overdiagnosis in screening for lung cancer are grossly exaggerated.

Authors:  Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Microsimulation model predicts survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy versus radiotherapy for treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Chung Yin Kong; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Michael Lanuti; G Scott Gazelle; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Chapter 3: Cohort life tables by smoking status, removing lung cancer as a cause of death.

Authors:  Marjorie A Rosenberg; Eric J Feuer; Binbing Yu; Jiafeng Sun; S Jane Henley; Thomas G Shanks; Christy M Anderson; Pamela M McMahon; Michael J Thun; David M Burns
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Estimating overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Massimo Bellomi; Cristiano Rampinelli; Iara Durli; Raffaella Bertolotti; Lorenzo Spaggiari
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Malignancy estimation of Lung-RADS criteria for subsolid nodules on CT: accuracy of low and high risk spectrum when using NLST nodules.

Authors:  Kaman Chung; Colin Jacobs; Ernst T Scholten; Onno M Mets; Irma Dekker; Mathias Prokop; Bram van Ginneken; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  7 in total

1.  Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: How long should they be observed until clinically relevant growth occurs?

Authors:  Eui Jin Hwang; Chang Min Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Optimal management of pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules.

Authors:  Yeon Wook Kim; Choon-Taek Lee
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

3.  Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Mark M Hammer; Lauren L Palazzo; Chung Yin Kong; Andetta R Hunsaker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Subsolid pulmonary nodules: Controversy and perspective.

Authors:  Mark M Hammer; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-09-04

Review 5.  Implications of the updated Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS version 1.1) for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Spencer C Dyer; Brian J Bartholmai; Chi Wan Koo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Small-sized Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Manifesting Skip-like Transition from Nonsolid Nodule: A Case Report.

Authors:  Takaomi Hanaoka; Naoki Ishizaka; Dai Kimura; Kayoko Ikegawa; Mitsuyo Okada; Shugo Takahata; Hiroaki Motoyama
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2022-05-30

7.  Lung cancer probability and clinical outcomes of baseline and new subsolid nodules detected on low-dose CT screening.

Authors:  Yeon Wook Kim; Byoung Soo Kwon; Sung Yoon Lim; Yeon Joo Lee; Jong Sun Park; Young-Jae Cho; Ho Il Yoon; Kyung Won Lee; Jae Ho Lee; Jin-Haeng Chung; Eunjeong Ji; Choon-Taek Lee
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 9.139

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.