Literature DB >> 25431237

Expression levels of SF3B3 correlate with prognosis and endocrine resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Yesim Gökmen-Polar1, Yaseswini Neelamraju2, Chirayu P Goswami3, Xiaoping Gu1, Gouthami Nallamothu1, Sarath Chandra Janga4, Sunil Badve5.   

Abstract

De novo or acquired resistance to endocrine therapy limits its utility in a significant number of estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancers. It is crucial to identify novel targets for therapeutic intervention and improve the success of endocrine therapies. Splicing factor 3b, subunit 1 (SF3B1) mutations are described in luminal breast cancer albeit in low frequency. In this study, we evaluated the role of SF3B1 and SF3B3, critical parts of the SF3b splicing complex, in ER-positive endocrine resistance. To ascertain the role of SF3B1/SF3B3 in endocrine resistance, their expression levels were evaluated in ER-positive/endocrine-resistant cell lines (MCF-7/LCC2 and MCF-7/LCC9) using a real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). To further determine their clinical relevance, expression analysis was performed in a cohort of 60 paraffin-embedded ER-positive, node-negative breast carcinomas with low, intermediate, and high Oncotype DX recurrence scores. Expression levels of SF3B1 and SF3B3 and their prognostic value were validated in large cohorts using publicly available gene expression data sets including The Cancer Genome Atlas. SF3B1 and SF3B3 levels were significantly increased in ERα-positive cells with acquired tamoxifen (MCF-7/LCC2; both P<0.0002) and fulvestrant/tamoxifen resistance (MCF-7/LCC9; P=0.008 for SF3B1 and P=0.0006 for SF3B3). Expression levels of both MCF-7/LCC2 and MCF-7/LCC9 were not affected by additional treatments with E2 and/or tamoxifen. Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that SF3B3 expression is significantly upregulated in Oncotype DX high-risk groups when compared with low risk (P=0.019). Similarly, in publicly available breast cancer gene expression data sets, overexpression of SF3B3, but not SF3B1, was significantly correlated with overall survival. Furthermore, the correlation was significant in ER-positive, but not in ER-negative tumors.This is the first study to document the role of SF3B3 in endocrine resistance and prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer. Potential strategies for therapeutic targeting of the splicing mechanism(s) need to be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25431237     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  31 in total

1.  MCF7/LCC9: an antiestrogen-resistant MCF-7 variant in which acquired resistance to the steroidal antiestrogen ICI 182,780 confers an early cross-resistance to the nonsteroidal antiestrogen tamoxifen.

Authors:  N Brünner; B Boysen; S Jirus; T C Skaar; C Holst-Hansen; J Lippman; T Frandsen; M Spang-Thomsen; S A Fuqua; R Clarke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Synthetic mRNA splicing modulator compounds with in vivo antitumor activity.

Authors:  Chandraiah Lagisetti; Alan Pourpak; Tinopiwa Goronga; Qin Jiang; Xiaoli Cui; Judith Hyle; Jill M Lahti; Stephan W Morris; Thomas R Webb
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  SF3B1 and other novel cancer genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Michael S Lawrence; Youzhong Wan; Petar Stojanov; Carrie Sougnez; Kristen Stevenson; Lillian Werner; Andrey Sivachenko; David S DeLuca; Li Zhang; Wandi Zhang; Alexander R Vartanov; Stacey M Fernandes; Natalie R Goldstein; Eric G Folco; Kristian Cibulskis; Bethany Tesar; Quinlan L Sievers; Erica Shefler; Stacey Gabriel; Nir Hacohen; Robin Reed; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Donna Neuberg; Jennifer R Brown; Gad Getz; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Test-firing ammunition for spliceosome inhibition in cancer.

Authors:  Scott M Dehm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  GOBO: gene expression-based outcome for breast cancer online.

Authors:  Markus Ringnér; Erik Fredlund; Jari Häkkinen; Åke Borg; Johan Staaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  SF3B1 mutations are associated with alternative splicing in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Marc-Henri Stern; Richard Marais; Simon J Furney; Malin Pedersen; David Gentien; Amaury G Dumont; Audrey Rapinat; Laurence Desjardins; Samra Turajlic; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Pierre de la Grange; Sergio Roman-Roman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  J William Harbour; Elisha D O Roberson; Hima Anbunathan; Michael D Onken; Lori A Worley; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Alternative splicing modulates cancer aggressiveness: role in EMT/metastasis and chemoresistance.

Authors:  Debanwita Roy Burman; Shalini Das; Rahul Bhattacharya; Chandrima Das
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  The promise and challenge of ovarian cancer models.

Authors:  Noor Hasan; Anders W Ohman; Daniela M Dinulescu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.241

3.  Splicing factor ESRP1 controls ER-positive breast cancer by altering metabolic pathways.

Authors:  Yesim Gökmen-Polar; Yaseswini Neelamraju; Chirayu P Goswami; Yuan Gu; Xiaoping Gu; Gouthami Nallamothu; Edyta Vieth; Sarath C Janga; Michael Ryan; Sunil S Badve
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Alternative Splicing of EZH2 pre-mRNA by SF3B3 Contributes to the Tumorigenic Potential of Renal Cancer.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Haibing Xiao; Jin Zeng; Gan Yu; Hui Zhou; Chunhua Huang; Weimin Yao; Wei Xiao; Junhui Hu; Wei Guan; Lily Wu; Jiaoti Huang; Qihong Huang; Hua Xu; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Mutations acquired by hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence give rise to an aggressive phenotype.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Choi; Min Jae Kim; Yong Keun Park; Jong-Yeop Im; So Mee Kwon; Hyung Chul Kim; Hyun Goo Woo; Hee-Jung Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  Jerantinine A induces tumor-specific cell death through modulation of splicing factor 3b subunit 1 (SF3B1).

Authors:  Felicia Fei-Lei Chung; Perry Faith Tze Ming Tan; Vijay Joseph Raja; Boon-Shing Tan; Kuan-Hon Lim; Toh-Seok Kam; Ling-Wei Hii; Si Hoey Tan; Sze-Jia See; Yuen-Fen Tan; Li-Zhe Wong; Wai Keat Yam; Chun Wai Mai; Tracey D Bradshaw; Chee-Onn Leong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Global proteomics profiling improves drug sensitivity prediction: results from a multi-omics, pan-cancer modeling approach.

Authors:  Mehreen Ali; Suleiman A Khan; Krister Wennerberg; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  Splicing dysregulation as a driver of breast cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Read; Rachael Natrajan
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.678

9.  Splicing modulator FR901464 is a potential agent for colorectal cancer in combination therapy.

Authors:  Tomoki Yamano; Shuji Kubo; Aya Yano; Tomoko Kominato; Shino Tanaka; Masataka Ikeda; Naohiro Tomita
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2019-01-08

10.  Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis identifies novel functional pathways of tumor suppressor DLC1 in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yesim Gökmen-Polar; Jason D True; Edyta Vieth; Yuan Gu; Xiaoping Gu; Guihong D Qi; Amber L Mosley; Sunil S Badve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.