Literature DB >> 23313955

Recurrent mutations at codon 625 of the splicing factor SF3B1 in uveal melanoma.

J William Harbour1, Elisha D O Roberson, Hima Anbunathan, Michael D Onken, Lori A Worley, Anne M Bowcock.   

Abstract

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary cancer of the eye and often results in fatal metastasis. Here, we describe mutations occurring exclusively at codon 625 of the SF3B1 gene, encoding splicing factor 3B subunit 1, in low-grade uveal melanomas with good prognosis. Thus, uveal melanoma is among a small group of cancers associated with SF3B1 mutations, and these mutations denote a distinct molecular subset of uveal melanomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23313955      PMCID: PMC3789378          DOI: 10.1038/ng.2523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


Uveal melanomas can be divided into prognostically significant subgroups based on their transcriptomic signature. Class 1 tumors rarely metastasize, and they tend be less invasive, more differentiated and occur in younger individuals than class 2 tumors[1]. In contrast, class 2 tumors frequently metastasize, and they tend to comprise undifferentiated “epithelioid” tumor cells lacking a copy of chromosome 3[1]. We recently described loss of function mutations in BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein 1), located at chromosome 3p21.1, in ∼40% of uveal melanomas, virtually all of which were the aggressive class 2 tumors[2]. In the present study, we searched for additional mutations in uveal melanoma by exome sequencing of 18 primary tumors, including seven class 1 and eleven class 2 tumors. Exome data were filtered down to somatic alterations that were predicted to be deleterious (Supplementary Methods). Only two genes were found to harbor deleterious somatic variants in at least three tumor samples: guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit alpha (GNAQ), which is already known to undergo mutation in uveal melanoma[3,4], and splicing factor 3B subunit 1 (SF3B1). In the case of SF3B1, the mutation in all three tumors led to a p.R625C alteration (hg19 chr2:198267484G>A) which was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. We manually examined the entire SF3B1 coding sequence from the other 15 exome samples, but we did not find mutations at any sites other than R625. SF3B1 mutations were recently described in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), clustering within exons 12 to 15[5,6]. Thus, we re-sequenced these exons in a total of 102 primary uveal melanomas and matching blood DNA samples and identified SF3B1 mutations in 19 (18.6%) tumors (Supplementary Table 1). This frequency is similar to that in MDS and CLL[5,6], and much higher than that recently reported in breast cancer[7]. Strikingly, all of the mutations in uveal melanoma occurred atarginine-625, including twelve R625H, five R625C, one R625G and one R625L substitutions (Supplementary Fig. 1). Interestingly, R625 is one of many sites in SF3B1 that are mutated in MDS, but it is the only site that was identified as deleterious by the SIFT algorithm[5], which predicts the effect an amino acid substitution has on protein function. SF3B1 mutations were not present in matching blood DNA samples, indicating that they were somatic in origin. In each of the tumors with SF3B1 mutations, wildtype and mutant alleles were present in roughly equal proportions (Supplementary Fig. 1). An evaluation of DNA copy number in 30 of the uveal melanomas, including seven with SF3B1 mutations, revealed no loss of chromosome 2q33.1 where SF3B1 resides (Supplementary Fig. 2),which would have been consistent with a classical tumor suppressor. Rather, these findings are more consistent with SF3B1 mutations functioning as dominant-negative, gain-of-function or haploinsufficient alteration. SF3B1 mutations were associated with favorable prognostic features such as younger patient age (P=0.03) and fewer undifferentiated epithelioid cells (P=0.003), and they were inversely associated with poor prognostic features such as the class 2 transcriptomic signature (P = 0.02), loss of chromosome 3 (P = 0.001) and mutation of BAP1 (P=0.002) (Table 1). Patients with SF3B1-mutant tumors trended toward a lower metastatic rate than those with SF3B1-wildtype tumors (P=0.1), which was in striking contrast to the high metastatic rate in patients with BAP1 mutations (P<0.0001)(Fig. 1). Five uveal melanoma samples from distant metastases were available for testing, and none harbored SF3B1 mutations, further supporting the notion that these mutations might be associated with less aggressive tumors. Taken together, these findings indicate that SF3B1 mutations are associated with better prognosis in uveal melanoma, which is similar to findings in MDS[5].
Table 1

Associations between SF3B1 mutation and clinical, histopathologic and genetic features

VariableSF3B1 wildtypeSF3B1 mutantP-value

Patient age
 Mean63.055.30.03
 Median65.060.0
 Minimum, Maximum24-8716-76

Patient sex
 Female34 (41%)12 (63%)0.1
 Male49 (59%)7 (37%)

Tumor diameter (mm)
 Mean16.017.10.3
 Median16.017.2
 Minimum, Maximum3-249-24

Tumor thickness (mm)
 Mean8.88.60.8
 Median9.08.1
 Minimum, Maximum1-162-15

Ciliary body involvement
 Yes44 (60%)9 (47%)0.4
 No29 (40%)10 (53%)
 Not available100

Epithelioid cell type
 Yes33 (40%)1 (5%)0.003
 No49 (60%)18 (95%)
 Not available10

Extraocular tumor invasion
 Yes17 (21%)5 (26%)0.8
 No64 (79%)14 (74%)
 Not available20

BAP1 status
 Wildtype37 (54%)16 (94%)0.002
 Mutant31 (46%)1 (6%)
 Not available152

GNAQ status
 Wildtype40 (60%)10 (53%)0.6
 Mutant27 (40%)9 (47%)
 Not available160

GNA11 status
 Wildtype28 (43%)12 (67%)0.1
 Mutant37 (57%)6 (33%)
 Not available181

Gene expression class
 Class 137 (49%)14 (82%)0.02
 Class 238 (51%)3 (18%)
 Not available82

Chromosome 3 status
 Retention of heterozygosity34 (49%)14 (93%)0.001
 Loss of heterozygosity36 (51%)1 (7%)
 Not available134
Figure 1

SF3B1 mutations in uveal melanoma. (a) Sanger sequence traces of representative tumor samples harboring wild type or mutant SF3B1 alleles at codon 625. (b) Kaplan-Meier survival plots of 102 uveal melanoma patients stratified by SF3B1 mutation status (top) and BAP1 mutation status (bottom).

SF3B1 is one of very few genes that are commonly mutated in uveal melanoma, allowing for a more precise molecular taxonomy of this cancer. Activating oncogenic mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 occur in about 85% of primary uveal melanomas and are thought to represent early events because they are found in uveal melanomas of all stages, including pre-malignant nevi, and they are not associated with prognosis[3,8]. Consistent with this idea, GNAQ/GNA11 mutations were present in most of our SF3B1-mutant and BAP1-mutant tumors, suggesting that they arise earlier than SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations. In contrast, SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations were almost mutually exclusive, suggesting that they may represent alternative pathways in tumor progression. SF3B1 encodes subunit 1 of the splicing factor 3b protein complex, which is a component of the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex (snRNP) that participates in the splicing of pre-mRNAs[9]. Splicing factor 3b is also a component of the minor U12-type spliceosome[9]. To explore the effects of mutant SF3B1 on global RNA expression, we analyzed five SF3B1-mutant and six SF3B1-wildtype class 1 tumors for differentially expressed transcripts using the Illumina Bead Array platform. This analysis was limited to class 1 tumors because most SF3B1 mutations occurred in this subset. Surprisingly, there were only 10 differentially expressed genes, and they provided no insights into the functional significance of the SF3B1 mutations (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). Moreover, none of these genes were the same as those that were differentially expressed in MDS[5,10]. We therefore investigated if the main consequence of SF3B1 mutations was intron retention rather than differential expression. Three SF3B1-mutant and five SF3B1-wildtype class 1 tumors were analyzed for alterations in splice donor and splice acceptor retention using RNA-Seq (Supplementary Methods). However, no differences in global splice donor or acceptor retention were found between SF3B1-mutant and –wildtype tumors (data not shown). Further, we manually analyzed a set of neural crest regulatory transcripts that are aberrantly spliced in sf3b1-mutant zebrafish (SNAI1, SOX9, TFAP2A, SOX10, ID2, MITF and SF3B1)[11], but no splicing abnormalities were found. Despite the known role of SF3B1 in RNA splicing, there have not been consistent results linking SF3B1 mutations to specific splicing errors in MDS or CLL, and the functional consequences of SF3B1 mutations remain elusive despite intensive investigation[12]. Recent links between SF3B1 and chromatin remodelling complexes[13] raise the question of whether the primary effect of SF3B1 mutations on tumor progression involve RNA processing at all. Further investigations are under way to elucidate the effects of SF3B1 mutations on uveal melanoma progression in order to therapeutically target these effects.

Data access

Gene expression micro array and array CGH data have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (accession numbers GSE39717 and GSE42740, respectively). Exome sequences and RNA-seq data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession numbers SRA062369 and SRA062359, respectively).
  13 in total

1.  Molecular architecture of the multiprotein splicing factor SF3b.

Authors:  Monika M Golas; Bjoern Sander; Cindy L Will; Reinhard Lührmann; Holger Stark
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mammalian polycomb-mediated repression of Hox genes requires the essential spliceosomal protein Sf3b1.

Authors:  Kyoichi Isono; Yoko Mizutani-Koseki; Toshihisa Komori; Marion S Schmidt-Zachmann; Haruhiko Koseki
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  SF3B1, a splicing factor is frequently mutated in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts.

Authors:  V Visconte; H Makishima; A Jankowska; H Szpurka; F Traina; A Jerez; C O'Keefe; H J Rogers; M A Sekeres; J P Maciejewski; R V Tiu
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  The genetics of uveal melanoma: an emerging framework for targeted therapy.

Authors:  J William Harbour
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.693

5.  Frequent mutation of BAP1 in metastasizing uveal melanomas.

Authors:  J William Harbour; Michael D Onken; Elisha D O Roberson; Shenghui Duan; Li Cao; Lori A Worley; M Laurin Council; Katie A Matatall; Cynthia Helms; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  SF3B1 haploinsufficiency leads to formation of ring sideroblasts in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Valeria Visconte; Heesun J Rogers; Jarnail Singh; John Barnard; Manoj Bupathi; Fabiola Traina; James McMahon; Hideki Makishima; Hadrian Szpurka; Anna Jankowska; Andres Jerez; Mikkael A Sekeres; Yogen Saunthararajah; Anjali S Advani; Edward Copelan; Haruhiko Koseki; Kyoichi Isono; Richard A Padgett; Sami Osman; Kazunori Koide; Christine O'Keefe; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Ramon V Tiu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  SF3B1 and other novel cancer genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Michael S Lawrence; Youzhong Wan; Petar Stojanov; Carrie Sougnez; Kristen Stevenson; Lillian Werner; Andrey Sivachenko; David S DeLuca; Li Zhang; Wandi Zhang; Alexander R Vartanov; Stacey M Fernandes; Natalie R Goldstein; Eric G Folco; Kristian Cibulskis; Bethany Tesar; Quinlan L Sievers; Erica Shefler; Stacey Gabriel; Nir Hacohen; Robin Reed; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Donna Neuberg; Jennifer R Brown; Gad Getz; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Mutations in GNA11 in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Catherine D Van Raamsdonk; Klaus G Griewank; Michelle B Crosby; Maria C Garrido; Swapna Vemula; Thomas Wiesner; Anna C Obenauf; Werner Wackernagel; Gary Green; Nancy Bouvier; M Mert Sozen; Gail Baimukanova; Ritu Roy; Adriana Heguy; Igor Dolgalev; Raya Khanin; Klaus Busam; Michael R Speicher; Joan O'Brien; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Oncogenic mutations in GNAQ occur early in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Michael D Onken; Lori A Worley; Meghan D Long; Shenghui Duan; M Laurin Council; Anne M Bowcock; J William Harbour
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi.

Authors:  Catherine D Van Raamsdonk; Vladimir Bezrookove; Gary Green; Jürgen Bauer; Lona Gaugler; Joan M O'Brien; Elizabeth M Simpson; Gregory S Barsh; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  205 in total

1.  SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations in blue nevus-like melanoma.

Authors:  Klaus G Griewank; Hansgeorg Müller; Louise A Jackett; Michael Emberger; Inga Möller; Johannes Ap van de Nes; Lisa Zimmer; Elisabeth Livingstone; Thomas Wiesner; Simone L Scholz; Ioana Cosgarea; Antje Sucker; Tobias Schimming; Uwe Hillen; Bastian Schilling; Annette Paschen; Henning Reis; Thomas Mentzel; Heinz Kutzner; Arno Rütten; Rajmohan Murali; Richard A Scolyer; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Jejunojejunal intussusception secondary to metastatic uveal melanoma after 11 years of remission.

Authors:  Hifza Waheed Butt; Sarthak Soin; Faisal Ali; Antoni Wojtkowski
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-22

3.  Integrative Copy Number Analysis of Uveal Melanoma Reveals Novel Candidate Genes Involved in Tumorigenesis Including a Tumor Suppressor Role for PHF10/BAF45a.

Authors:  Hima Anbunathan; Ruth Verstraten; Arun D Singh; J William Harbour; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Altered RNA Processing in Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy.

Authors:  Esther A Obeng; Connor Stewart; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 39.397

5.  Optimization of antitumor modulators of pre-mRNA splicing.

Authors:  Chandraiah Lagisetti; Gustavo Palacios; Tinopiwa Goronga; Burgess Freeman; William Caufield; Thomas R Webb
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  The Augmented R-Loop Is a Unifying Mechanism for Myelodysplastic Syndromes Induced by High-Risk Splicing Factor Mutations.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Jia-Yu Chen; Yi-Jou Huang; Ying Gu; Jinsong Qiu; Hao Qian; Changwei Shao; Xuan Zhang; Jing Hu; Hairi Li; Shunmin He; Yu Zhou; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Dong-Er Zhang; Xiang-Dong Fu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Aberrant RNA Splicing in Cancer.

Authors:  Luisa Escobar-Hoyos; Katherine Knorr; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-11-28

Review 8.  The molecular pathology of melanoma: an integrated taxonomy of melanocytic neoplasia.

Authors:  Boris C Bastian
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 9.  Splicing factor gene mutations in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Borja Saez; Matthew J Walter; Timothy A Graubert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Developments in Ocular Genetics: 2013 Annual Review.

Authors:  Inas F Aboobakar; R Rand Allingham
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2014 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.