Literature DB >> 25426770

Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography.

Richard G Barr1, Zheng Zhang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether addition of quality measure (QM) of shear-wave (SW) velocity (Vs) estimation can increase SW elastography sensitivity for breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With written informed consent, this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study included 143 women (mean age, 48.5 years ± 8.7) scheduled for breast biopsy. Mean lesion size was 16.4 mm ± 11.8; 95 (66%) lesions were benign; 48 (34%), malignant. If more than one lesion was present, lesion with highest Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category was chosen. If there were more than one with highest BI-RADS category, a lesion was randomly selected. Conventional ultrasonography (US), strain elastography, and SW elastography were performed with QM. QM assesses SW quality to provide accurate Vs. Lesions were evaluated for Vs and QM (high or low). Lesions with Vs of less than 4.5 m/sec were classified benign; lesions with Vs of 4.5 m/sec or greater, malignant. Results were correlated with pathologic findings. Vs data with or without incorporating QM were used to determine SW elastography diagnostic performance. Binomial proportions and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: In 95 benign lesions, 13 (14%) had no SW elastography signal; 77 (81%), Vs of less than 4.5 m/sec; and five (5%), Vs of 4.5 m/sec or greater. In 48 malignant lesions, eight (17%) had no SW elastography signal; 20 (42%), Vs of less than 4.5 m/sec; and 20 (42%), V of 4.5 m/sec or greater. QM was low in 17 of 20 (85%) malignant lesions with Vs of less than 4.5 m/sec. Without QM, using Vs of 4.5 m/sec or greater as test positive, SW elastography had lesion-level sensitivity of 50% (95% CI: 34%, 66%); specificity, 94% (95% CI: 86%, 98%); positive predictive value (PPV), 80% (95% CI: 59%, 93%); and negative predictive value (NPV), 79% (95% CI: 70%, 87%). Using QM where additional lesions with both low Vs and low QM were treated as test positive, SW elastography had lesion-level sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 80%, 98%); specificity, 89% (95% CI: 80%, 95%); PPV, 80% (95% CI: 66%, 91%); and NPV, 96% (95% CI: 89%, 99%).
CONCLUSION: Addition of QM can improve SW elastography sensitivity, with no significant change in specificity. © RSNA, 2014 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25426770     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Jun-Mei Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions : Our experience with QelaXtoTM software.

Authors:  Karina Pesce; Fernando Binder; María José Chico; María Paz Swiecicki; Diana Herbas Galindo; Sergio Terrasa
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-11

3.  Evaluation of Reconstruction Parameters for 2-D Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography.

Authors:  Jorge Racedo; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Shear-wave elastography quantitative assessment of the male breast: added value to distinguish benign and malignant palpable masses.

Authors:  Amandine Crombé; Gabrielle Hurtevent-Labrot; Maryam Asad-Syed; Jean Palussière; Gaetan MacGrogan; Michèle Kind; Stéphane Ferron
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Strain Elastography - How To Do It?

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Richard G Barr; André Farrokh; Manjiri Dighe; Michael Hocke; Christian Jenssen; Yi Dong; Adrian Saftoiu; Roald Flesland Havre
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-12-07

6.  On the Challenges Associated with Obtaining Reproducible Measurements Using SWEI in the Median Nerve.

Authors:  Anna E Knight; Samantha L Lipman; Thammathida Ketsiri; Lisa D Hobson-Webb; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Update on Breast Cancer Detection Using Comb-Push Ultrasound Shear Elastography.

Authors:  Max Denis; Mahdi Bayat; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Adriana Gregory; Pengfei Song; Dana H Whaley; Sandhya Pruthi; Shigao Chen; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Characterization of soft tissue tumours with ultrasound, shear wave elastography and MRI.

Authors:  N Winn; J Baldwin; V Cassar-Pullicino; P Cool; M Ockendon; B Tins; J L Jaremko
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Comparison of Shear-Wave and Strain Ultrasound Elastography for Evaluating Fat Induration after Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sowa; Toshiaki Numajiri; Sizu Itsukage; Kenichi Nishino
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-04-07

10.  Influence of age, sex, body mass index, alcohol, and smoking on shear wave velocity (p-SWE) of the pancreas.

Authors:  Sabina Stumpf; Heike Jaeger; Tilmann Graeter; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Julian Schmidberger; Mark Martin Haenle; Wolfgang Kratzer
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.