Literature DB >> 25426270

Breast density measurements using ultrasound tomography for patients undergoing tamoxifen treatment.

Mark Sak1, Neb Duric2, Peter Littrup2, Cuiping Li2, Lisa Bey-Knight1, Mark Sherman3, Norman Boyd4, Gretchen Gierach3.   

Abstract

Women with high breast density have an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Women treated with the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen for estrogen receptor positive breast cancer experience a 50% reduction in risk of contralateral breast cancer and overall reduction of similar magnitude has been identified among high-risk women receiving the drug for prevention. Tamoxifen has been shown to reduce mammographic density, and in the IBIS-1 chemoprevention trial, risk reduction and decline in density were significantly associated. Ultrasound tomography (UST) is an imaging modality that can create tomographic sound speed images of the breast. These sound speed images are useful because breast density is proportional to sound speed. The aim of this work is to examine the relationship between UST-measured breast density and the use of tamoxifen. So far, preliminary results for a small number of patients have been observed and are promising. Correlations between the UST-measured density and mammographic density are strong and positive, while relationships between UST density with some patient specific risk factors behave as expected. Initial results of UST examinations of tamoxifen treated patients show that approximately 45% of the patients have a decrease in density in the contralateral breast after only several months of treatment. The true effect of tamoxifen on UST-measured density cannot yet be fully determined until more data are collected. However, these promising results suggest that UST can be used to reliably assess quantitative changes in breast density over short intervals and therefore suggest that UST may enable rapid assessment of density changes associated with therapeutic and preventative interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast density; Tamoxifen; Ultrasound tomography

Year:  2013        PMID: 25426270      PMCID: PMC4241344          DOI: 10.1117/12.2007146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  27 in total

1.  Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen.

Authors:  C Atkinson; R Warren; S A Bingham; N E Day
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  William E Barlow; Emily White; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Pamela M Vacek; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Patricia A Carney; Jeffrey A Tice; Diana S M Buist; Berta M Geller; Robert Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Helen Guo; Anna Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Tamoxifen, mammographic density, and breast cancer prevention.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Reproductive and hormonal factors associated with mammographic breast density by age (United States).

Authors:  A Y El-Bastawissi; E White; M T Mandelson; S H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Randomized double-blind 2 x 2 trial of low-dose tamoxifen and fenretinide for breast cancer prevention in high-risk premenopausal women.

Authors:  Andrea Decensi; Chris Robertson; Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga; Davide Serrano; Massimiliano Cazzaniga; Serena Mora; Marcella Gulisano; Harriet Johansson; Viviana Galimberti; Enrico Cassano; Simona M Moroni; Franca Formelli; Ernst A Lien; Giuseppe Pelosi; Karen A Johnson; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Kathy R Brandt; Alice Wang; Carol Janney; Zachary S Fredericksen; James R Cerhan; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  11 in total

1.  Mammographic Density as a Biosensor of Tamoxifen Effectiveness in Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment of Breast Cancer: Opportunities and Implications.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Sarah J Nyante; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Marjorie Perloff; Ismail Jatoi; Louise A Brinton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Robert N Hoover; Andrew Glass; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Using ultrasound tomography to identify the distributions of density throughout the breast.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-04

3.  Current and Future Methods for Measuring Breast Density: A Brief Comparative Review.

Authors:  Mark A Sak; Peter J Littrup; Neb Duric; Maeve Mullooly; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-08-28

4.  Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?

Authors:  Sergio J Sanabria; Orcun Goksel; Katharina Martini; Serafino Forte; Thomas Frauenfelder; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Marga B Rominger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Determinants of the reliability of ultrasound tomography sound speed estimates as a surrogate for volumetric breast density.

Authors:  Zeina G Khodr; Mark A Sak; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Nebojsa Duric; Peter Littrup; Lisa Bey-Knight; Haythem Ali; Patricia Vallieres; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Ultrasound tomography imaging with waveform sound speed: Parenchymal changes in women undergoing tamoxifen therapy.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup; Mark Sherman; Gretchen Gierach
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-03

7.  Speed of sound ultrasound: a pilot study on a novel technique to identify sarcopenia in seniors.

Authors:  Sergio J Sanabria; Katharina Martini; Gregor Freystätter; Lisa Ruby; Orcun Goksel; Thomas Frauenfelder; Marga B Rominger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Using Speed of Sound Imaging to Characterize Breast Density.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup; Lisa Bey-Knight; Haythem Ali; Patricia Vallieres; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Comparison of sound speed measurements on two different ultrasound tomography devices.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Peter Littrup; Lisa Bey-Knight; Mark Sherman; Gretchen Gierach; Antonina Malyarenko
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-20

10.  Automatic Segmentation of Ultrasound Tomography Image.

Authors:  Shibin Wu; Shaode Yu; Ling Zhuang; Xinhua Wei; Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Jiani Hu; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.