Literature DB >> 25426185

A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL POINT PROCESS MODEL FOR MULTI-TYPE NEUROIMAGING META-ANALYSIS.

Jian Kang1, Thomas E Nichols2, Tor D Wager3, Timothy D Johnson4.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging meta-analysis is an important tool for finding consistent effects over studies that each usually have 20 or fewer subjects. Interest in meta-analysis in brain mapping is also driven by a recent focus on so-called "reverse inference": where as traditional "forward inference" identifies the regions of the brain involved in a task, a reverse inference identifies the cognitive processes that a task engages. Such reverse inferences, however, requires a set of meta-analysis, one for each possible cognitive domain. However, existing methods for neuroimaging meta-analysis have significant limitations. Commonly used methods for neuroimaging meta-analysis are not model based, do not provide interpretable parameter estimates, and only produce null hypothesis inferences; further, they are generally designed for a single group of studies and cannot produce reverse inferences. In this work we address these limitations by adopting a non-parametric Bayesian approach for meta analysis data from multiple classes or types of studies. In particular, foci from each type of study are modeled as a cluster process driven by a random intensity function that is modeled as a kernel convolution of a gamma random field. The type-specific gamma random fields are linked and modeled as a realization of a common gamma random field, shared by all types, that induces correlation between study types and mimics the behavior of a univariate mixed effects model. We illustrate our model on simulation studies and a meta analysis of five emotions from 219 studies and check model fit by a posterior predictive assessment. In addition, we implement reverse inference by using the model to predict study type from a newly presented study. We evaluate this predictive performance via leave-one-out cross validation that is efficiently implemented using importance sampling techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian Spatial Point Processes; Classification; Hierarchical model; Neuorimage meta-analysis; Random Intensity Measure

Year:  2014        PMID: 25426185      PMCID: PMC4241351          DOI: 10.1214/14-aoas757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  16 in total

1.  Modeling of activation data in the BrainMap database: detection of outliers.

Authors:  Finn Arup Nielsen; Lars Kai Hansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant.

Authors:  J A Russell; L F Barrett
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-05

3.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Susan Reading
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Functional volumes modeling: theory and preliminary assessment.

Authors:  P T Fox; J L Lancaster; L M Parsons; J H Xiong; F Zamarripa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning.

Authors:  Joseph J Paton; Marina A Belova; Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Functional grouping and cortical-subcortical interactions in emotion: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Hedy Kober; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Josh Joseph; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Kristen Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Voxel-wise meta-analysis of grey matter changes in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Joaquim Radua; David Mataix-Cols
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.319

8.  Meta Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Data via Bayesian Spatial Point Processes.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas E Nichols; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 9.  Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Russell A Poldrack; David C Van Essen; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Christian Grefkes; Ling E Wang; Karl Zilles; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  10 in total

1.  Spatial Bayesian latent factor regression modeling of coordinate-based meta-analysis data.

Authors:  Silvia Montagna; Tor Wager; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Bayesian log-Gaussian Cox process regression: with applications to meta-analysis of neuroimaging working memory studies.

Authors:  Pantelis Samartsidis; Claudia R Eickhoff; Simon B Eickhoff; Tor D Wager; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Shir Atzil; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  The coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Pantelis Samartsidis; Silvia Montagna; Thomas E Nichols; Timothy D Johnson
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  Bayesian Models for fMRI Data Analysis.

Authors:  Linlin Zhang; Michele Guindani; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

5.  Dissociable meta-analytic brain networks contribute to coordinated emotional processing.

Authors:  Michael C Riedel; Julio A Yanes; Kimberly L Ray; Simon B Eickhoff; Peter T Fox; Matthew T Sutherland; Angela R Laird
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Involvement of Sensory Regions in Affective Experience: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ajay B Satpute; Jian Kang; Kevin C Bickart; Helena Yardley; Tor D Wager; Lisa F Barrett
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-15

7.  Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI.

Authors:  Freya Acar; Ruth Seurinck; Simon B Eickhoff; Beatrijs Moerkerke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimating the prevalence of missing experiments in a neuroimaging meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pantelis Samartsidis; Silvia Montagna; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  A Cortical Surface-Based Meta-Analysis of Human Reasoning.

Authors:  Minho Shin; Hyeon-Ae Jeon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  A BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL POINT PROCESS MODEL FOR MULTI-TYPE NEUROIMAGING META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Jian Kang; Thomas E Nichols; Tor D Wager; Timothy D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.083

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.