Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Acoustic feedback and other audible artifacts in hearing AIDS.

Literature DB >> 25425855

Acoustic feedback and other audible artifacts in hearing AIDS.

J Agnew¹.

Abstract

Entities: Disease

Year: 1996 PMID： 25425855 PMCID： PMC4172233 DOI： 10.1177/108471389600100202

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Amplif ISSN： 1084-7138

× No keyword cloud information.

11 in total

1. Limitations on insertion gains with vented earmoulds imposed by oscillatory feedback.

Authors: S Gatehouse
Journal: Br J Audiol Date: 1989-05

2. Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation.

Authors: J M Kates
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 1988-06 Impact factor: 3.570

3. Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm.

Authors: A M Engebretson; M French-St George
Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 1993

4. An investigation into sound attenuation by earmould tubing.

Authors: L Flack; R White; J Tweed; D W Gregory; M Y Qureshi
Journal: Br J Audiol Date: 1995-08

5. Digital feedback suppression (DFS). Characterization of feedback-margin improvements in a DFS hearing instrument.

Authors: O Dyrlund; L B Henningsen; N Bisgaard; J H Jensen
Journal: Scand Audiol Date: 1994

6. Digital feedback suppression (DFS). Clinical experiences when fitting a DFS hearing instrument on children.

Authors: L B Henningsen; O Dyrlund; N Bisgaard; B Brink
Journal: Scand Audiol Date: 1994

7. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.

Authors: F K Kuk
Journal: J Am Acad Audiol Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 1.664

8. Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response.

Authors: R M Cox
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 1982 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.570

9. The hearing aid feedback path: mathematical simulations and experimental verification.

Authors: D P Egolf; H C Howell; K A Weaver; D S Barker
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 1985-11 Impact factor: 1.840

10. Behavioral assessment of adaptive feedback equalization in a digital hearing aid.

Authors: M French-St George; D J Wood; A M Engebretson
Journal: J Rehabil Res Dev Date: 1993

9 in total

Review 1. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.

Authors: King Chung
Journal: Trends Amplif Date: 2004

2. Development of digital hearing AIDS.

Authors: C Schweitzer
Journal: Trends Amplif Date: 1997-06

3. Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors: C V Palmer
Journal: Trends Amplif Date: 1998-03

4. The causes and effects of distortion and internal noise in hearing AIDS.

Authors: J Agnew
Journal: Trends Amplif Date: 1998-09

5. Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid.

Authors: Morteza Khaleghi; Sunil Puria
Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.840

6. Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors: Renee M Banakis Hartl; James R Easter; Mohamed A Alhussaini; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins
Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2019 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.570

7. Preferences for Hearing Aid Attributes Among People with Moderate or Greater Hearing Loss in Rural China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors: Dawei Zhu; Xuefeng Shi; Stephen Nicholas; Xin Ye; Siyuan Chen; Ping He
Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 2.711

8. Towards Auditory Profile-Based Hearing-Aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation.

Authors: Raul Sanchez-Lopez; Michal Fereczkowski; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Tobias Neher
Journal: Audiol Res Date: 2021-01-16

9. A Practical Tablet-Based Hearing Aid Configuration as an Exemplar Project for Students of Instrumentation.

Authors: Ricardo Simeoni
Journal: Audiol Res Date: 2015-06-26

9 in total