Literature DB >> 33026425

Waves of Change: Brain Sensitivity to Differential, not Absolute, Stimulus Intensity is Conserved Across Humans and Rats.

R Somervail1,2, F Zhang3,4, G Novembre2, R J Bufacchi2, Y Guo2, M Crepaldi5, L Hu3,4, G D Iannetti1,2.   

Abstract

Living in rapidly changing environments has shaped the mammalian brain toward high sensitivity to abrupt and intense sensory events-often signaling threats or affordances requiring swift reactions. Unsurprisingly, such events elicit a widespread electrocortical response (the vertex potential, VP), likely related to the preparation of appropriate behavioral reactions. Although the VP magnitude is largely determined by stimulus intensity, the relative contribution of the differential and absolute components of intensity remains unknown. Here, we dissociated the effects of these two components. We systematically varied the size of abrupt intensity increases embedded within continuous stimulation at different absolute intensities, while recording brain activity in humans (with scalp electroencephalography) and rats (with epidural electrocorticography). We obtained three main results. 1) VP magnitude largely depends on differential, and not absolute, stimulus intensity. This result held true, 2) for both auditory and somatosensory stimuli, indicating that sensitivity to differential intensity is supramodal, and 3) in both humans and rats, suggesting that sensitivity to abrupt intensity differentials is phylogenetically well-conserved. Altogether, the current results show that these large electrocortical responses are most sensitive to the detection of sensory changes that more likely signal the sudden appearance of novel objects or events in the environment.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral relevance; electrocorticography (ECoG); electroencephalography (EEG); multispecies investigation; saliency-detection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33026425      PMCID: PMC7786352          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  73 in total

1.  Importance of knowing your stimulation paradigm: methodological considerations on laser-evoked pain responses in rats and humans.

Authors:  Andreas Hess
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  The ERP signature of sound rise time changes.

Authors:  Jennifer M Thomson; Usha Goswami; Torsten Baldeweg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Determinants of laser-evoked EEG responses: pain perception or stimulus saliency?

Authors:  G D Iannetti; N P Hughes; M C Lee; A Mouraux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Late somatosensory evoked cerebral potentials in response to cutaneous heat stimuli.

Authors:  R D Treede; S Kief; T Hölzer; B Bromm
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-11

Review 6.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Operculoinsular cortex encodes pain intensity at the earliest stages of cortical processing as indicated by amplitude of laser-evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  G D Iannetti; L Zambreanu; G Cruccu; I Tracey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Laser-evoked cerebral potentials in the assessment of cutaneous pain sensitivity in normal subjects and patients.

Authors:  B Bromm; R D Treede
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.607

9.  Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and cortical single unit responses elicited by mechanical tactile stimuli in awake monkeys.

Authors:  E P Gardner; H A Hämäläinen; S Warren; J Davis; W Young
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12

10.  Force encoding in muscle spindles during stretch of passive muscle.

Authors:  Kyle P Blum; Boris Lamotte D'Incamps; Daniel Zytnicki; Lena H Ting
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Speech-Level-Based Segmented Model to Decode the Dynamic Auditory Attention States in the Competing Speaker Scenes.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Yihan Wang; Zhixing Liu; Ed X Wu; Fei Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Towards a unified neural mechanism for reactive adaptive behaviour.

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 11.685

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.