| Literature DB >> 25421321 |
Moo Rim Kang1, Sun Ah Jo2, Yeo Dae Yoon3, Ki Hwan Park4, Soo Jin Oh5, Jieun Yun6, Chang Woo Lee7, Ki-Hoan Nam8, Youngsoo Kim9, Sang-Bae Han10, Jiyeon Yu11, Jaerang Rho12, Jong Soon Kang13.
Abstract
In the present study, we investigated the effect of agelasine D (AD) on osteoclastogenesis. Treatment of bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) with receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) resulted in a differentiation of BMMs into osteoclasts as evidenced by generation of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive, multinucleated cells and formation of pits in calcium phosphate-coated plates. However, RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis was significantly suppressed by AD treatment. We also confirmed the increased mRNA and protein expression of osteoclastic markers, such as TRAP, cathepsin K and matrix metalloproteinase-9, during RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and this was down-regulated by AD treatment. Moreover, AD treatment significantly suppressed RANKL-induced mRNA expression of DC-STAMP and OC-STAMP and cell fusion of TRAP-positive mononuclear osteoclast precursors. In addition, AD suppressed RANKL-induced expression of transcription factors, c-Fos and nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1), which are important transcription factors involved in differentiation of BMMs into osteoclasts. Furthermore, RANKL-induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and activation of NF-κB were also inhibited by AD treatment. Collectively, these results suggest that AD inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by down-regulation of multiple signaling pathways involving c-Fos, NFATc1, NF-κB and ERK. Our results also suggest that AD might be a potential therapeutic agent for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25421321 PMCID: PMC4245549 DOI: 10.3390/md12115643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1(A) Chemical structure of agelasine D (AD); bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) were treated with vehicle or indicated concentrations of AD in the presence of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) for 4 days; (B) Cell viability was measured by XTT assay; (C) Culture supernatants were mixed with chromogenic substrate containing tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and the activity was determined by measuring optical density at 540 nm; (D) Cells were fixed with 10% formalin and stained with chromogenic substrate containing TRAP; Purified mature osteoclasts were plated on calcium phosphate-coated plates (E) or dentin slices (F) and treated with vehicle or AD (10 µM) in the presence of RANKL and M-CSF for 2 days. Pit formation was photographed under a light microscope. Each column shows the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s t-test (* p < 0.05).
Figure 2BMMs were treated with vehicle or indicated concentrations of AD in the presence of RANKL and M-CSF for 3 days. Total RNAs were isolated and the mRNA expression of TRAP (A), cathepsin K (B) and MMP-9 (C) was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Each column shows the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s t-test (* p < 0.05); (D) Gel photos of RT-PCR results; (E) The protein expression level of TRAP, cathepsin K and MMP-9 was analyzed by Western immunoblot analysis.
Figure 3TRAP-positive mononuclear ostoclast precursors were purified and treated with vehicle or AD (10 µM) in the presence of RANKL and M-CSF for 24 h. Total RNAs were isolated and the mRNA expression of dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP) (A) and osteoclast-stimulatory transmembrane protein (OC-STAMP) (B) was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR; (C) Cell fusion of TRAP-positive mononuclear ostoclast precursors was analyzed by TRAP staining. The number of multi-nucleated osteoclasts was counted in each well. Each column shows the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations. Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s t-test (* p < 0.05).
Figure 4BMMs were pretreated with vehicle or indicated concentrations of AD in the presence of M-CSF for 1 h and stimulated with RANKL for indicated times. Total cell lysates were prepared and the expression of c-Fos (A) and nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) (B) and the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) (C) were analyzed by Western Immunoblot analysis; (D) BMMs were treated with vehicle or indicated concentrations of AD in the presence of RANKL and M-CSF for 3 days. Total RNAs were isolated and the mRNA expression of NFATc1 was analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR.
Figure 5BMMs were pretreated with vehicle or indicated concentrations of AD in the presence of M-CSF for 1 h and stimulated with RANKL for indicated times. Total cell lysates were prepared and the phosphorylation of IκBα (A) and p65 subunit of NF-κB (B) were analyzed by Western immunoblot analysis. Results are representatives of more than two independent experiments.
Primer sequences for DC-STAMP, OC-STAMP, TRAP, Cathepsin K, MMP-9 and β-actin.
| Gene Name | Primer Sequence |
|---|---|
| DC-STAMP | forward: 5′-tggaggttcacttgaaactacgtg-3′ |
| OC-STAMP | forward: 5′-cagccacggaacacctct-3′ |
| TRAP | forward: 5′-ctgctgggcctacaaatat-3′ |
| Cathepsin K | forward: 5′-aggcggctatatgaccactg-3′ |
| MMP-9 | forward: 5′-cgtcgtgatccccacttact-3′ |
| β-actin | forward: 5′-tggaatcctgtgcgatccatgaaa-3′ |
Figure 6Schematic diagram of signaling pathways important for RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. The inhibitory effect of AD is mediated by blocking the activation of NF-κB and ERK signaling pathways and concomittant down-regulation of c-Fos and NFATc1.