Literature DB >> 25419618

Novel anthropomorphic hip phantom corrects systemic interscanner differences in proximal femoral vBMD.

S Bonaretti1, R D Carpenter, I Saeed, A J Burghardt, L Yu, M Bruesewitz, S Khosla, T Lang.   

Abstract

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is increasingly used in osteoporosis studies to assess volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone quality and strength. However, QCT is confronted by technical issues in the clinical research setting, such as potentially confounding effects of body size on vBMD measurements and lack of standard approaches to scanner cross-calibration, which affects measurements of vBMD in multicenter settings. In this study, we addressed systematic inter-scanner differences and subject-dependent body size errors using a novel anthropomorphic hip phantom, containing a calibration hip to estimate correction equations, and a contralateral test hip to assess the quality of the correction. We scanned this phantom on four different scanners and we applied phantom-derived corrections to in vivo images of 16 postmenopausal women scanned on two scanners. From the phantom study, we found that vBMD decreased with increasing phantom size in three of four scanners and that inter-scanner variations increased with increasing phantom size. In the in vivo study, we observed that inter-scanner corrections reduced systematic inter-scanner mean vBMD differences but that the inter-scanner precision error was still larger than expected from known intra-scanner precision measurements. In conclusion, inter-scanner corrections and body size influence should be considered when measuring vBMD from QCT images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419618      PMCID: PMC4442068          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/24/7819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas F Lang
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis.

Authors:  Wenjun Li; Miki Sode; Isra Saeed; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.

Authors:  Bernard A Birnbaum; Nicole Hindman; Julie Lee; James S Babb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength.

Authors:  T F Lang; J H Keyak; M W Heitz; P Augat; Y Lu; A Mathur; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Standardization of femur BMD.

Authors:  J Hanson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Quantitative CT for determination of bone mineral density: a review.

Authors:  C E Cann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.

Authors:  C Levi; J E Gray; E C McCullough; R R Hattery
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu; Bijoy J Thomas; J Keenan Brown; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone loss after bariatric surgery: discordant results between DXA and QCT bone density.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu; Mary L Bouxsein; Adam E Roy; Chantel Baldwin; Abby Cange; Robert M Neer; Lee M Kaplan; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Intestinal Calcium Absorption Decreases Dramatically After Gastric Bypass Surgery Despite Optimization of Vitamin D Status.

Authors:  Anne L Schafer; Connie M Weaver; Dennis M Black; Amber L Wheeler; Hanling Chang; Gina V Szefc; Lygia Stewart; Stanley J Rogers; Jonathan T Carter; Andrew M Posselt; Dolores M Shoback; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Hip load capacity and yield load in men and women of all ages.

Authors:  J H Keyak; T S Kaneko; S Khosla; S Amin; E J Atkinson; T F Lang; J D Sibonga
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.

Authors:  Hugo Giambini; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Ahmad Nassr; Michael J Yaszemski; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Hip load capacity cut-points for Astronaut Skeletal Health NASA Finite Element Strength Task Group Recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew S Michalski; Shreyasee Amin; Angela M Cheung; Dianna D Cody; Joyce H Keyak; Thomas F Lang; Daniel P Nicolella; Eric S Orwoll; Steven K Boyd; Jean D Sibonga
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.415

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.