Literature DB >> 25419264

Diffusion tensor smoothing through weighted Karcher means.

Owen Carmichael1, Jun Chen2, Debashis Paul2, Jie Peng2.   

Abstract

Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quantifies the spatial distribution of water Diffusion at each voxel on a regular grid of locations in a biological specimen by Diffusion tensors- 3 × 3 positive definite matrices. Removal of noise from DTI is an important problem due to the high scientific relevance of DTI and relatively low signal to noise ratio it provides. Leading approaches to this problem amount to estimation of weighted Karcher means of Diffusion tensors within spatial neighborhoods, under various metrics imposed on the space of tensors. However, it is unclear how the behavior of these estimators varies with the magnitude of DTI sensor noise (the noise resulting from the thermal e!ects of MRI scanning) as well as the geometric structure of the underlying Diffusion tensor neighborhoods. In this paper, we combine theoretical analysis, empirical analysis of simulated DTI data, and empirical analysis of real DTI scans to compare the noise removal performance of three kernel-based DTI smoothers that are based on Euclidean, log-Euclidean, and affine-invariant metrics. The results suggest, contrary to conventional wisdom, that imposing a simplistic Euclidean metric may in fact provide comparable or superior noise removal, especially in relatively unstructured regions and/or in the presence of moderate to high levels of sensor noise. On the contrary, log-Euclidean and affine-invariant metrics may lead to better noise removal in highly structured anatomical regions, especially when the sensor noise is of low magnitude. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the interplay of sensor noise magnitude and tensor field geometric structure when assessing Diffusion tensor smoothing options. They also point to the necessity for continued development of smoothing methods that perform well across a large range of scenarios.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion MRI; Karcher mean; Tensor space; kernel smoothing; perturbation analysis.

Year:  2013        PMID: 25419264      PMCID: PMC4239671          DOI: 10.1214/13-ejs825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electron J Stat        ISSN: 1935-7524            Impact factor:   1.125


  20 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Statistical artifacts in diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI) caused by background noise.

Authors:  P J Basser; S Pajevic
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity.

Authors:  David S Tuch; Timothy G Reese; Mette R Wiegell; Nikos Makris; John W Belliveau; Van J Wedeen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors.

Authors:  Vincent Arsigny; Pierre Fillard; Xavier Pennec; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Diffusion tensor imaging: structural adaptive smoothing.

Authors:  Karsten Tabelow; Jörg Polzehl; Vladimir Spokoiny; Henning U Voss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A technique for single-channel MR brain tissue segmentation: application to a pediatric sample.

Authors:  J C Rajapakse; J N Giedd; C DeCarli; J W Snell; A McLaughlin; Y C Vauss; A L Krain; S Hamburger; J L Rapoport
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data.

Authors:  H Gudbjartsson; S Patz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  New methods in diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer; Samantha J Holdsworth; Wouter B Veldhuis; Stefan T Skare
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Local Polynomial Regression for Symmetric Positive Definite Matrices.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Hongtu Zhu; Weili Lin; J S Marron
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Nonlinear smoothing for reduction of systematic and random errors in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  G J Parker; J A Schnabel; M R Symms; D J Werring; G J Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  3 in total

1.  FIBER DIRECTION ESTIMATION, SMOOTHING AND TRACKING IN DIFFUSION MRI.

Authors:  Raymond K W Wong; Thomas C M Lee; Debashis Paul; Jie Peng
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Estimating fiber orientation distribution from diffusion MRI with spherical needlets.

Authors:  Hao Yan; Owen Carmichael; Debashis Paul; Jie Peng
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Diffusion tensor smoothing through weighted Karcher means.

Authors:  Owen Carmichael; Jun Chen; Debashis Paul; Jie Peng
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.125

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.