Literature DB >> 25418580

Preanalytical variables and phosphoepitope expression in FFPE tissue: quantitative epitope assessment after variable cold ischemic time.

Maria Vassilakopoulou1, Fabio Parisi1, Summar Siddiqui1, Allison M England1, Elizabeth R Zarella1, Valsamo Anagnostou1, Yuval Kluger1, David G Hicks2, David L Rimm1, Veronique M Neumeister1.   

Abstract

Individualized targeted therapies for cancer patients require accurate and reproducible assessment of biomarkers to be able to plan treatment accordingly. Recent studies have shown highly variable effects of preanalytical variables on gene expression profiling and protein levels of different tissue types. Several publications have described protein degradation of tissue samples as a direct result of delay of formalin fixation of the tissue. Phosphorylated proteins are more labile and epitope degradation can happen within 30 min of cold ischemic time. To address this issue, we evaluated the change in antigenicity of a series of phosphoproteins in paraffin-embedded samples from breast tumors as a function of time to formalin fixation. A tissue microarray consisting of 93 breast cancer specimens with documented time-to-fixation was used to evaluate changes in antigenicity of 12 phosphoepitopes frequently used in research settings as a function of cold ischemic time. Analysis was performed in a quantitative manner using the AQUA technology for quantitative immunofluorescence. For each marker, least squares univariate linear regression was performed and confidence intervals were computed using bootstrapping. The majority of the epitopes tested revealed changes in expression levels with increasing time to formalin fixation. Some phosphorylated proteins, such as phospho-HSP27 and phospho-S6 RP, involved in post-translational modification and stress response pathways increased in expression or phosphorylation levels. Others (like phospho-AKT, phosphor-ERK1/2, phospho-Tyrosine, phospho-MET, and others) are quite labile and loss of antigenicity can be reported within 1-2 h of cold ischemic time. Therefore specimen collection should be closely monitored and subjected to quality control measures to ensure accurate measurement of these epitopes. However, a few phosphoepitopes (like phospho-JAK2 and phospho-ER) are sufficiently robust for routine usage in companion diagnostic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25418580     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  40 in total

1.  Inadequate formalin fixation decreases reliability of p27 immunohistochemical staining: probing optimal fixation time using high-density tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Angelo M De Marzo; Helen H Fedor; Wesely R Gage; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Proteomic analysis of apoptotic pathways reveals prognostic factors in follicular lymphoma.

Authors:  Christian Gulmann; Virginia Espina; Emanuel Petricoin; Dan L Longo; Mariarita Santi; Turid Knutsen; Mark Raffeld; Elaine S Jaffe; Lance A Liotta; Andrew L Feldman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Phosphorylated S6 kinase-1: a breast cancer marker predicting resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Eun-Kyu Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Hyun-Ah Kim; Hyesil Seol; Min-Ki Seong; Joo-Young Lee; Jangmoo Byeon; Yeun Ju Sohn; Jae Soo Koh; In-Chul Park; Woo Chul Noh
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 4.  Phosphoproteomic approaches to elucidate cellular signaling networks.

Authors:  Katrin Schmelzle; Forest M White
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 5.  Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection.

Authors:  Joseph A Ludwig; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Routine assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer using a multicore tissue microarray procedure.

Authors:  Anna Sapino; Caterina Marchiò; Rebecca Senetta; Isabella Castellano; Luigia Macrì; Paola Cassoni; Giampiero Ghisolfi; Milena Cerrato; Enrico D'Ambrosio; Gianni Bussolati
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Stability of phosphoprotein as a biological marker of tumor signaling.

Authors:  Amanda F Baker; Tomislav Dragovich; Nathan T Ihle; Ryan Williams; Cecilia Fenoglio-Preiser; Garth Powis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Mapping molecular networks using proteomics: a vision for patient-tailored combination therapy.

Authors:  Emanuel F Petricoin; Verena E Bichsel; Valerie S Calvert; Virginia Espina; Mary Winters; Lynn Young; Claudio Belluco; Bruce J Trock; Marc Lippman; David A Fishman; Dennis C Sgroi; Peter J Munson; Laura J Esserman; Lance A Liotta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Increased survival after treatments with anticancer agents of Chinese hamster cells expressing the human Mr 27,000 heat shock protein.

Authors:  J Huot; G Roy; H Lambert; P Chrétien; J Landry
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Phosphorylated p-70S6K predicts tamoxifen resistance in postmenopausal breast cancer patients randomized between adjuvant tamoxifen versus no systemic treatment.

Authors:  Karin Beelen; Mark Opdam; Tesa M Severson; Rutger H T Koornstra; Andrew D Vincent; Jelle Wesseling; Jettie J Muris; Els M J J Berns; Jan B Vermorken; Paul J van Diest; Sabine C Linn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Protein biomarkers for subtyping breast cancer and implications for future research.

Authors:  Claudius Mueller; Amanda Haymond; Justin B Davis; Alexa Williams; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 2.  Understanding preanalytical variables and their effects on clinical biomarkers of oncology and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Lokesh Agrawal; Kelly B Engel; Sarah R Greytak; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Active monitoring of formaldehyde diffusion into histological tissues with digital acoustic interferometry.

Authors:  Daniel R Bauer; Benjamin Stevens; David Chafin; Abbey P Theiss; Michael Otter
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-02-08

4.  STAT3 activation and risk of recurrence in meningiomas.

Authors:  Mahlon Johnson; Mary O'Connell; Kevin Walter
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activity in IDH-mutant diffuse glioma and clinical implications.

Authors:  Esraa Mohamed; Anupam Kumar; Yalan Zhang; Albert S Wang; Katharine Chen; Yunita Lim; Anny Shai; Jennie W Taylor; Jennifer Clarke; Stephanie Hilz; Mitchel S Berger; David A Solomon; Joseph F Costello; Annette M Molinaro; Joanna J Phillips
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

6.  ERK1/2 phosphorylation predicts survival following anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Víctor A Arrieta; Andrew X Chen; J Robert Kane; Seong Jae Kang; Cynthia Kassab; Crismita Dmello; Junfei Zhao; Kirsten B Burdett; Pavan S Upadhyayula; Catalina Lee-Chang; Joseph Shilati; Dinesh Jaishankar; Li Chen; Andrew Gould; Daniel Zhang; Jinzhou Yuan; Wenting Zhao; Xiaoyang Ling; Jared K Burks; Brice Laffleur; Christina Amidei; Jeffrey N Bruce; Rimas V Lukas; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; David Cieremans; Gerson Rothschild; Uttiya Basu; Matthew McCord; Daniel J Brat; Hui Zhang; Lee A D Cooper; Bin Zhang; Peter Sims; Tim F Cloughesy; Robert Prins; Peter Canoll; Roger Stupp; Amy B Heimberger; Craig Horbinski; Fabio M Iwamoto; Raul Rabadan; Adam M Sonabend
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 7.  Pharmacodynamic endpoints as clinical trial objectives to answer important questions in oncology drug development.

Authors:  Ralph E Parchment; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  EGFR and RB1 as Dual Biomarkers in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Tim N Beck; Rachel Georgopoulos; Elena I Shagisultanova; David Sarcu; Elizabeth A Handorf; Cara Dubyk; Miriam N Lango; John A Ridge; Igor Astsaturov; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Barbara A Burtness; Ranee Mehra; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging of human tissues and tumors using t-CyCIF and conventional optical microscopes.

Authors:  Jia-Ren Lin; Benjamin Izar; Shu Wang; Clarence Yapp; Shaolin Mei; Parin M Shah; Sandro Santagata; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Qualifying antibodies for image-based immune profiling and multiplexed tissue imaging.

Authors:  Ziming Du; Jia-Ren Lin; Rumana Rashid; Zoltan Maliga; Shu Wang; Jon C Aster; Benjamin Izar; Peter K Sorger; Sandro Santagata
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 13.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.