Literature DB >> 35287169

PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activity in IDH-mutant diffuse glioma and clinical implications.

Esraa Mohamed1, Anupam Kumar1, Yalan Zhang1, Albert S Wang1, Katharine Chen1, Yunita Lim1, Anny Shai1, Jennie W Taylor2,3, Jennifer Clarke2,3, Stephanie Hilz1, Mitchel S Berger1, David A Solomon3, Joseph F Costello1, Annette M Molinaro1, Joanna J Phillips1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas are heterogeneous, and improved methods for optimal patient therapeutic stratification are needed. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling activity can drive disease progression and potential therapeutic inhibitors of the pathway are available. Yet, the prevalence of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activity in IDH-mutant glioma is unclear and few robust strategies to assess activity in clinical samples exist.
METHODS: PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway activity was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 132 IDH-mutant diffuse glioma (91 astrocytoma and 41 oligodendroglioma, 1p/19q-codeleted) through quantitative multiplex immunoprofiling using phospho-specific antibodies for PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway members, PRAS40, RPS6, and 4EBP1, and tumor-specific anti-IDH1 R132H. Expression levels were correlated with genomic evaluation of pathway intrinsic genes and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the relationship with outcome.
RESULTS: Tumor-specific expression of p-PRAS40, p-RPS6, and p-4EBP1 was common in IDH-mutant diffuse glioma and increased with CNS WHO grade from 2 to 3. Genomic analysis predicted pathway activity in 21.7% (13/60) while protein evaluation identified active PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in 56.6% (34/60). Comparison of expression in male versus female patients suggested sexual dimorphism. Of particular interest, when adjusting for clinical prognostic factors, the level of phosphorylation of RPS6 was strongly associated with PFS (P < .005). Phosphorylation levels of both PRAS40 and RPS6 showed an association with PFS in univariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasizes the value of proteomic assessment of signaling pathway activity in tumors as a means to identify relevant oncogenic pathways and potentially as a biomarker for identifying aggressive disease.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PI3K/AKT/mTOR; biomarker; glioma; outcome; quantitative immunoprofiling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35287169      PMCID: PMC9435510          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   13.029


  48 in total

Review 1.  mTOR signaling in growth control and disease.

Authors:  Mathieu Laplante; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A Kinase Inhibitor Targeted to mTORC1 Drives Regression in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  QiWen Fan; Ozlem Aksoy; Robyn A Wong; Shirin Ilkhanizadeh; Chris J Novotny; William C Gustafson; Albert Yi-Que Truong; Geraldine Cayanan; Erin F Simonds; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Joanna J Phillips; Theodore Nicolaides; Masanori Okaniwa; Kevan M Shokat; William A Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Genetic alterations of phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunit genes in human glioblastomas.

Authors:  Masahiro Mizoguchi; Catherine L Nutt; Gayatry Mohapatra; David N Louis
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.508

5.  ERK1/2 phosphorylation predicts survival following anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Víctor A Arrieta; Andrew X Chen; J Robert Kane; Seong Jae Kang; Cynthia Kassab; Crismita Dmello; Junfei Zhao; Kirsten B Burdett; Pavan S Upadhyayula; Catalina Lee-Chang; Joseph Shilati; Dinesh Jaishankar; Li Chen; Andrew Gould; Daniel Zhang; Jinzhou Yuan; Wenting Zhao; Xiaoyang Ling; Jared K Burks; Brice Laffleur; Christina Amidei; Jeffrey N Bruce; Rimas V Lukas; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; David Cieremans; Gerson Rothschild; Uttiya Basu; Matthew McCord; Daniel J Brat; Hui Zhang; Lee A D Cooper; Bin Zhang; Peter Sims; Tim F Cloughesy; Robert Prins; Peter Canoll; Roger Stupp; Amy B Heimberger; Craig Horbinski; Fabio M Iwamoto; Raul Rabadan; Adam M Sonabend
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate.

Authors:  Lenny Dang; David W White; Stefan Gross; Bryson D Bennett; Mark A Bittinger; Edward M Driggers; Valeria R Fantin; Hyun Gyung Jang; Shengfang Jin; Marie C Keenan; Kevin M Marks; Robert M Prins; Patrick S Ward; Katharine E Yen; Linda M Liau; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Lewis C Cantley; Craig B Thompson; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Shinsan M Su
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme.

Authors:  T L Yuan; L C Cantley
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Prospective Feasibility Trial for Genomics-Informed Treatment in Recurrent and Progressive Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sara A Byron; Nhan L Tran; Rebecca F Halperin; Joanna J Phillips; John G Kuhn; John F de Groot; Howard Colman; Keith L Ligon; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Nicholas A Butowski; Jennie W Taylor; Jennifer L Clarke; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Annette M Molinaro; Gerald M Maggiora; Sen Peng; Sara Nasser; Winnie S Liang; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael E Berens; John D Carpten; David W Craig; Michael D Prados
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Quantitative assessment shows loss of antigenic epitopes as a function of pre-analytic variables.

Authors:  Yalai Bai; Juliana Tolles; Huan Cheng; Summar Siddiqui; Arun Gopinath; Eirini Pectasides; Robert L Camp; David L Rimm; Annette M Molinaro
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.662

10.  Antitumor activity of rapamycin in a Phase I trial for patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma.

Authors:  Tim F Cloughesy; Koji Yoshimoto; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Kevin Brown; Julie Dang; Shaojun Zhu; Teli Hsueh; Yinan Chen; Wei Wang; David Youngkin; Linda Liau; Neil Martin; Don Becker; Marvin Bergsneider; Albert Lai; Richard Green; Tom Oglesby; Michael Koleto; Jeff Trent; Steve Horvath; Paul S Mischel; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Molecular testing for adolescent and young adult central nervous system tumors: A Canadian guideline.

Authors:  Mary Jane Lim-Fat; Maria Macdonald; Sarah Lapointe; Seth Andrew Climans; Chantel Cacciotti; Manik Chahal; Sebastien Perreault; Derek S Tsang; Andrew Gao; Stephen Yip; Julia Keith; Julie Bennett; Vijay Ramaswamy; Jay Detsky; Uri Tabori; Sunit Das; Cynthia Hawkins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.