Literature DB >> 25416121

Outcome of isolated polyethylene tibial insert exchange after primary cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Christian Konrads1, Stefanie Brieske, Michael Holder, Matthias Walcher, Maximilian Rudert, Maik Hoberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty using a modular design gives the possibility for an isolated exchange of the tibial polyethylene insert in patients with failed total knee arthroplasty. The success of this kind of surgery is still controversial. We analysed the clinical outcome after isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange.
METHODS: In this retrospective study we included 62 consecutive patients with an isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange at our institution. The average follow-up was 35 months. For clinical evaluation we used the Oxford Knee score, the Knee Society score, the Turba score, and the Kujala score. The health-related quality of life was determined with the SF-36 score and the visual analogue pain scale.
RESULTS: The operations were performed 73 months after primary total knee arthroplasty on average. The main reasons for isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange were instability and wear. In the clinical outcome patients achieved 31.5 points in the Oxford Knee score, 120.5 points in the Knee Society score, 9.3 points in the Turba score, and 49.0 points in the Kujala score. Mean level of persisting pain was 2.2. In the SF-36 score patients achieved 36.3 points physical and 51.7 points mental. The overall survival for isolated tibial insert exchange revealed 72.2 % survival at 6.25 years follow-up with a repeat revision rate of 11 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange revealed a good clinical outcome. There is a tendency for better results in comparison with the information given in literature for most of the parameters including a lower rate in repeat revision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416121     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2595-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  Isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seann E Willson; Michelle L Munro; Julie C Sandwell; Kace A Ezzet; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The incidence of modular tibial polyethylene insert exchange in total knee arthroplasty when polyethylene failure occurs.

Authors:  J M Bert; J Reuben; F Kelly; M Gross; J Elting
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Authors:  F C Ewald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G C Babis; R T Trousdale; M W Pagnano; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Clinical results of modular polyethylene insert exchange with retention of total knee arthroplasty components.

Authors:  G A Engh; L M Koralewicz; T R Pereles
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total knee arthroplasty at 15-17 years: does implant design affect outcome?

Authors:  Jan Victor; Stijn Ghijselings; Farhad Tajdar; Geert Van Damme; Patrick Deprez; Nele Arnout; Catherine Van Der Straeten
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  When Polyethylene Exchange Is Appropriate for Prosthetic Knee Instability.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Robert Baird; Brian Park; Craig Della Valle
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist.

Authors:  Shiraz A Sabah; Elizabeth A Hedge; Simon G F Abram; Abtin Alvand; Andrew J Price; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.