Literature DB >> 9741434

The incidence of modular tibial polyethylene insert exchange in total knee arthroplasty when polyethylene failure occurs.

J M Bert1, J Reuben, F Kelly, M Gross, J Elting.   

Abstract

One of the primary reasons for utilizing modular tibial polyethylene inserts (MTPI) at the time of total knee arthroplasty is to have the ability to simply exchange the polyethylene at the time of revision surgery when polyethylene failure has occurred. During a 2-year period from January 1993 to December 1994, 62 revision total knee arthroplasties were reviewed from five different institutions in North America, which were performed secondary to modular tibial insert failure. In 55 cases (88.7%), significant scoring and/or damage to the femoral and/or tibial components occurred necessitating revision of one or both components. This series does not support the premise that polyethylene exchange is common at the time of revision surgery for MTPI failure. Of the patients 88.7% had MTPI failure resulted in femoral and/or tibial component revision secondary to surface damage to the femoral component and/or tibial component baseplate. In order to avoid femoral and tibial component wear secondary to MTPI failure, early recognition is necessary to allow the much simpler operation consisting of polyethylene liner exchange only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9741434     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)80001-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seann E Willson; Michelle L Munro; Julie C Sandwell; Kace A Ezzet; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcome of isolated polyethylene tibial insert exchange after primary cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Konrads; Stefanie Brieske; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert; Maik Hoberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Modular versus nonmodular tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty: what are the differences?

Authors:  Asim M Makhdom; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

4.  [Survey of incidents associated with hip and knee replacement devices. Analysis of the surveillance and registration system for medical products for the years 2000-2002].

Authors:  B C Heinz; D von Mallek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Backside wear in modern total knee designs.

Authors:  Prakash Jayabalan; Bridgette D Furman; Jocelyn M Cottrell; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-02

6.  Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Henrica M J Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.