Literature DB >> 25414125

Strong artificial selection in domestic mammals did not result in an increased recombination rate.

Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes1, Marina Marcet-Ortega2, Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu3, Catharina Linde Forsberg4, Jane M Morrell4, Esperanza Manzano-Piedras5, Arne Söderberg6, Katrin Daniel7, Adrian Villalba2, Attila Toth7, Anna Di Rienzo3, Ignasi Roig2, Carles Vilà5.   

Abstract

Recombination rates vary in intensity and location at the species, individual, sex and chromosome levels. Despite the fundamental biological importance of this process, the selective forces that operate to shape recombination rate and patterns are unclear. Domestication offers a unique opportunity to study the interplay between recombination and selection. In domesticates, intense selection for particular traits is imposed on small populations over many generations, resulting in organisms that differ, sometimes dramatically, in morphology and physiology from their wild ancestor. Although earlier studies suggested increased recombination rate in domesticates, a formal comparison of recombination rates between domestic mammals and their wild congeners was missing. In order to determine broad-scale recombination rate, we used immunolabeling detection of MLH1 foci as crossover markers in spermatocytes in three pairs of closely related wild and domestic species (dog and wolf, goat and ibex, and sheep and mouflon). In the three pairs, and contrary to previous suggestions, our data show that contemporary recombination rate is higher in the wild species. Subsequently, we inferred recombination breakpoints in sequence data for 16 genomic regions in dogs and wolves, each containing a locus associated with a dog phenotype potentially under selection during domestication. No difference in the number and distribution of recombination breakpoints was found between dogs and wolves. We conclude that our data indicate that strong directional selection did not result in changes in recombination in domestic mammals, and that both upper and lower bounds for crossover rates may be tightly regulated.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canis; Capra; MLH1; Ovis; genomics; immunolocalization; spermatocytes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25414125      PMCID: PMC4298180          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  83 in total

1.  Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Selection for recombination in small populations.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Recombination in evolutionary genomics.

Authors:  David Posada; Keith A Crandall; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Jocelyn Poissant; John T Hogg; Corey S Davis; Joshua M Miller; Jillian F Maddox; David W Coltman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Gilean A T McVean
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Chromosome choreography: the meiotic ballet.

Authors:  Scott L Page; R Scott Hawley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Chiasma counts and non-disjunction frequencies in a normal ram and in rams carrying the Massey I (t1) Robertsonian translocation.

Authors:  S E Long
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1978-07

8.  What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9?

Authors:  Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Death of PRDM9 coincides with stabilization of the recombination landscape in the dog genome.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Matthew T Webster; Abhirami Ratnakumar; Chris P Ponting; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Prdm9, a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots, is not functional in dogs and their wild relatives, wolves and coyotes.

Authors:  Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes; Anna Di Rienzo; Carles Vilà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.

Authors:  Amy L Dapper; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genetics of Genome-Wide Recombination Rate Evolution in Mice from an Isolated Island.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A High-Resolution SNP Array-Based Linkage Map Anchors a New Domestic Cat Draft Genome Assembly and Provides Detailed Patterns of Recombination.

Authors:  Gang Li; LaDeana W Hillier; Robert A Grahn; Aleksey V Zimin; Victor A David; Marilyn Menotti-Raymond; Rondo Middleton; Steven Hannah; Sher Hendrickson; Alex Makunin; Stephen J O'Brien; Pat Minx; Richard K Wilson; Leslie A Lyons; Wesley C Warren; William J Murphy
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Mutation rate analysis via parent-progeny sequencing of the perennial peach. II. No evidence for recombination-associated mutation.

Authors:  Long Wang; Yanchun Zhang; Chao Qin; Dacheng Tian; Sihai Yang; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A Pathway-Centered Analysis of Pig Domestication and Breeding in Eurasia.

Authors:  Jordi Leno-Colorado; Nick J Hudson; Antonio Reverter; Miguel Pérez-Enciso
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Founder events, isolation, and inbreeding: Intercontinental genetic structure of the domestic ferret.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; Michelle G Hawkins; Tracy L Drazenovich; Robert Church; Susan A Brown; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Cattle Sex-Specific Recombination and Genetic Control from a Large Pedigree Analysis.

Authors:  Li Ma; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Paul M VanRaden; Botong Shen; Abinash Padhi; Chuanyu Sun; Derek M Bickhart; John B Cole; Daniel J Null; George E Liu; Yang Da; George R Wiggans
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Conserved Genetic Architecture Underlying Individual Recombination Rate Variation in a Wild Population of Soay Sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Susan E Johnston; Camillo Bérénos; Jon Slate; Josephine M Pemberton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Variation in recombination frequency and distribution across eukaryotes: patterns and processes.

Authors:  Jessica Stapley; Philine G D Feulner; Susan E Johnston; Anna W Santure; Carole M Smadja
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  The consequences of sequence erosion in the evolution of recombination hotspots.

Authors:  Irene Tiemann-Boege; Theresa Schwarz; Yasmin Striedner; Angelika Heissl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.