Literature DB >> 21388701

What are the genomic drivers of the rapid evolution of PRDM9?

Chris P Ponting1.   

Abstract

Mammalian Prdm9 has been proposed to be a key determinant of the positioning of chromosome double-strand breaks during meiosis, a contributor to speciation processes, and the most rapidly evolving gene in human, and other animal, genomes. Prdm9 genes often exhibit substantial variation in their numbers of encoded zinc fingers (ZFs), not only between closely related species but also among individuals of a species. The near-identity of these ZF sequences appears to render them very unstable in copy number. The rare sequence differences, however, cluster within ZF sites that determine the DNA-binding specificity of PRDM9, and these substitutions are frequently positively selected. Here, possible drivers of the rapid evolution of Prdm9 are discussed, including selection for efficient pairing of homologous chromosomes or for recombination of deleterious linked alleles, and selection against depletion of recombination hotspots or against disease-associated genome rearrangement.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21388701     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  41 in total

Review 1.  The impressionistic landscape of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Michael Lichten; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The Red Queen and King in finite populations.

Authors:  Carl Veller; Laura K Hayward; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A rapidly evolved domain, the SCML2 DNA-binding repeats, contributes to chromatin binding of mouse SCML2†.

Authors:  So Maezawa; Kris G Alavattam; Mayu Tatara; Rika Nagai; Artem Barski; Satoshi H Namekawa
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 4.  Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.

Authors:  Amy L Dapper; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Strong artificial selection in domestic mammals did not result in an increased recombination rate.

Authors:  Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes; Marina Marcet-Ortega; Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu; Catharina Linde Forsberg; Jane M Morrell; Esperanza Manzano-Piedras; Arne Söderberg; Katrin Daniel; Adrian Villalba; Attila Toth; Anna Di Rienzo; Ignasi Roig; Carles Vilà
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation.

Authors:  Frédéric Baudat; Yukiko Imai; Bernard de Massy
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Zinc finger binding motifs do not explain recombination rate variation within or between species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Caiti S S Heil; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Epigenetic remodeling of meiotic crossover frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methyltransferase mutants.

Authors:  Nataliya E Yelina; Kyuha Choi; Liudmila Chelysheva; Malcolm Macaulay; Bastiaan de Snoo; Erik Wijnker; Nigel Miller; Jan Drouaud; Mathilde Grelon; Gregory P Copenhaver; Christine Mezard; Krystyna A Kelly; Ian R Henderson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  High diversity at PRDM9 in chimpanzees and bonobos.

Authors:  Linn Fenna Groeneveld; Rebeca Atencia; Rosa M Garriga; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterization of Prdm9 in equids and sterility in mules.

Authors:  Cynthia C Steiner; Oliver A Ryder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.