Literature DB >> 25413845

The Ebbinghaus illusion in a fish (Xenotoca eiseni).

Valeria Anna Sovrano1, Liliana Albertazzi, Orsola Rosa Salva.   

Abstract

The tendency of fish to perceive the Ebbinghaus illusion was investigated. Redtail splitfins (Xenotoca eiseni, family Goodeidae) were trained to discriminate between two disks of different sizes. Then, fish were presented with two disks of the same size surrounded by disks of large or small size (inducers) arranged to produce the impression (to a human observer) of two disks of different sizes (in the Ebbinghaus illusion, a central disk surrounded by small inducers appears bigger than an identical one surrounded by large inducers). Fish chose the stimulus that, on the basis of a perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion, appeared deceptively larger or smaller, consistent with the condition of training. These results demonstrate that redtail splitfins tend to perceive this particular illusion. The results are discussed with reference to other related illusions that have been recently observed to be experienced by fish (such as the Navon effect), and with regard to their possible evolutionary implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25413845     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0821-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  13 in total

1.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Simone Gori; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Distinct Contributions of Genes and Environment to Visual Size Illusion and the Underlying Neural Mechanism.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Qian Xu; Li Shen; Tian Yuan; Ying Wang; Wen Zhou; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are deceived by visual illusions during obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Angelo Bisazza; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

7.  Triggerfish uses chromaticity and lightness for object segregation.

Authors:  Laurie Mitchell; Karen L Cheney; Fabio Cortesi; N Justin Marshall; Misha Vorobyev
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in guppies.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 9.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Perceptual category learning of photographic and painterly stimuli in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans.

Authors:  Drew Altschul; Greg Jensen; Herbert Terrace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.