Literature DB >> 25411489

Reward activates stimulus-specific and task-dependent representations in visual association cortices.

Anne-Marike Schiffer1, Timothy Muller2, Nick Yeung2, Florian Waszak3.   

Abstract

Humans reliably learn which actions lead to rewards. One prominent question is how credit is assigned to environmental stimuli that are acted upon. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have provided evidence that representations of rewarded stimuli are activated upon reward delivery, providing possible eligibility traces for credit assignment. Our study sought evidence of postreward activation in sensory cortices satisfying two conditions of instrumental learning: postreward activity should reflect the stimulus category that preceded reward (stimulus specificity), and should occur only if the stimulus was acted on to obtain reward (task dependency). Our experiment implemented two tasks in the fMRI scanner. The first was a perceptual decision-making task on degraded face and house stimuli. Stimulus specificity was evident as rewards activated the sensory cortices associated with face versus house perception more strongly after face versus house decisions, respectively, particularly in the fusiform face area. Stimulus specificity was further evident in a psychophysiological interaction analysis wherein face-sensitive areas correlated with nucleus accumbens activity after face-decision rewards, whereas house-sensitive areas correlated with nucleus accumbens activity after house-decision rewards. The second task required participants to make an instructed response. The criterion of task dependency was fulfilled as rewards after face versus house responses activated the respective association cortices to a larger degree when faces and houses were relevant to the performed task. Our study is the first to show that postreward sensory cortex activity meets these two key criteria of credit assignment, and does so independently from bottom-up perceptual processing.
Copyright © 2014 Schiffer et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  credit assignment; fMRI; reward-related learning; stimulus-specific postreward activation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411489      PMCID: PMC4236395          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1640-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox.

Authors:  Verena Willenbockel; Javid Sadr; Daniel Fiset; Greg O Horne; Frédéric Gosselin; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

2.  Attention-gated reinforcement learning of internal representations for classification.

Authors:  Pieter R Roelfsema; Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  The hippocampal-striatal axis in learning, prediction and goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  C M A Pennartz; R Ito; P F M J Verschure; F P Battaglia; T W Robbins
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory.

Authors:  P Waelti; A Dickinson; W Schultz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Refreshing and integrating visual scenes in scene-selective cortex.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Behavioral dopamine signals.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Representation of reward feedback in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Michael Brosch; Elena Selezneva; Henning Scheich
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-07

9.  Tools of the trade: psychophysiological interactions and functional connectivity.

Authors:  Jill X O'Reilly; Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Stephen M Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Reward facilitates tactile judgments and modulates hemodynamic responses in human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Burkhard Pleger; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

1.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Signed Reward Prediction Errors in the Ventral Striatum Drive Episodic Memory.

Authors:  Cristian B Calderon; Esther De Loof; Kate Ergo; Anna Snoeck; Carsten N Boehler; Tom Verguts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dynamic modulation of neural feedback processing and attention during spatial probabilistic learning.

Authors:  Celina Pütz; Berry van den Berg; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Dopamine is associated with prioritization of reward-associated memories in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Madeleine E Sharp; Katherine Duncan; Karin Foerde; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Causes and consequences of limitations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Sean James Fallon; Nahid Zokaei; Masud Husain
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Sensitivity to value-driven attention is predicted by how we learn from value.

Authors:  Sara Jahfari; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

7.  Adult-born neurons boost odor-reward association.

Authors:  Anne Grelat; Laura Benoit; Sébastien Wagner; Carine Moigneu; Pierre-Marie Lledo; Mariana Alonso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Task-irrelevant financial losses inhibit the removal of information from working memory.

Authors:  Sean James Fallon; Nina Dolfen; Francesca Parolo; Nahid Zokaei; Masud Husain
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Neurodevelopmental Changes in Social Reinforcement Processing: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Soonjo Hwang; Harma Meffert; Michelle R VanTieghem; Stuart F White; Stephen Sinclair; Susan Y Bookheimer; James Blair
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 10.  Understanding psychiatric disorder by capturing ecologically relevant features of learning and decision-making.

Authors:  Jacqueline Scholl; Miriam Klein-Flügge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.