Literature DB >> 25411465

Cell-type-specific resonances shape the responses of striatal neurons to synaptic input.

Joseph A Beatty1, Soomin C Song1, Charles J Wilson2.   

Abstract

Neurons respond to synaptic inputs in cell-type-specific ways. Each neuron type may thus respond uniquely to shared patterns of synaptic input. We applied statistically identical barrages of artificial synaptic inputs to four striatal cell types to assess differences in their responses to a realistic input pattern. Each interneuron type fired in phase with a specific input-frequency component. The fast-spiking interneuron fired in relation to the gamma-band (and higher) frequencies, the low-threshold spike interneuron to the beta-band frequencies, and the cholinergic neurons to the delta-band frequencies. Low-threshold spiking and cholinergic interneurons showed input impedance resonances at frequencies matching their spiking resonances. Fast-spiking interneurons showed resonance of input impedance but at lower than gamma frequencies. The spiny projection neuron's frequency preference did not have a fixed frequency but instead tracked its own firing rate. Spiny cells showed no input impedance resonance. Striatal interneurons are each tuned to a specific frequency band corresponding to the major frequency components of local field potentials. Their influence in the circuit may fluctuate along with the contribution of that frequency band to the input. In contrast, spiny neurons may tune to any of the frequency bands by a change in firing rate.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  basal ganglia; interneurons; oscillations; resonance; synaptic integration

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411465      PMCID: PMC4312866          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00827.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  55 in total

1.  Spontaneous activity of neostriatal cholinergic interneurons in vitro.

Authors:  B D Bennett; C J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; Y Yarom
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Models of subthreshold membrane resonance in neocortical neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; R M Miura; E Puil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Distinct roles of GABAergic interneurons in the regulation of striatal output pathways.

Authors:  Aryn H Gittis; Alexandra B Nelson; Myo T Thwin; Jorge J Palop; Anatol C Kreitzer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A Golgi study of rat neostriatal neurons: light microscopic analysis.

Authors:  H T Chang; C J Wilson; S T Kitai
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-06-20       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Control of spontaneous firing patterns by the selective coupling of calcium currents to calcium-activated potassium currents in striatal cholinergic interneurons.

Authors:  Joshua A Goldberg; Charles J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Spontaneous subthreshold membrane potential fluctuations and action potential variability of rat corticostriatal and striatal neurons in vivo.

Authors:  E A Stern; A E Kincaid; C J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The spiking component of oscillatory extracellular potentials in the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Erik W Schomburg; Costas A Anastassiou; György Buzsáki; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Fast oscillations in cortical-striatal networks switch frequency following rewarding events and stimulant drugs.

Authors:  J D Berke
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal and ventral striatum: anatomical and functional considerations in normal and diseased conditions.

Authors:  Kalynda K Gonzales; Yoland Smith
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Frequency-dependent entrainment of striatal fast-spiking interneurons.

Authors:  Matthew H Higgs; Charles J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Membrane potential resonance in non-oscillatory neurons interacts with synaptic connectivity to produce network oscillations.

Authors:  Andrea Bel; Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Predicting the response of striatal spiny neurons to sinusoidal input.

Authors:  Charles J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Resonance modulation, annihilation and generation of anti-resonance and anti-phasonance in 3D neuronal systems: interplay of resonant and amplifying currents with slow dynamics.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Membrane potential resonance frequency directly influences network frequency through electrical coupling.

Authors:  Yinbo Chen; Xinping Li; Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spiking resonances in models with the same slow resonant and fast amplifying currents but different subthreshold dynamic properties.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Frequency-dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The ionic mechanism of membrane potential oscillations and membrane resonance in striatal LTS interneurons.

Authors:  S C Song; J A Beatty; C J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Prolonged withdrawal from cocaine self-administration affects prefrontal cortex- and basolateral amygdala-nucleus accumbens core circuits but not accumbens GABAergic local interneurons.

Authors:  Anthony Purgianto; Michael E Weinfeld; Marina E Wolf
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.