Literature DB >> 28569367

Resonance modulation, annihilation and generation of anti-resonance and anti-phasonance in 3D neuronal systems: interplay of resonant and amplifying currents with slow dynamics.

Horacio G Rotstein1.   

Abstract

Subthreshold (membrane potential) resonance and phasonance (preferred amplitude and zero-phase responses to oscillatory inputs) in single neurons arise from the interaction between positive and negative feedback effects provided by relatively fast amplifying currents and slower resonant currents. In 2D neuronal systems, amplifying currents are required to be slave to voltage (instantaneously fast) for these phenomena to occur. In higher dimensional systems, additional currents operating at various effective time scales may modulate and annihilate existing resonances and generate antiresonance (minimum amplitude response) and antiphasonance (zero-phase response with phase monotonic properties opposite to phasonance). We use mathematical modeling, numerical simulations and dynamical systems tools to investigate the mechanisms underlying these phenomena in 3D linear models, which are obtained as the linearization of biophysical (conductance-based) models. We characterize the parameter regimes for which the system exhibits the various types of behavior mentioned above in the rather general case in which the underlying 2D system exhibits resonance. We consider two cases: (i) the interplay of two resonant gating variables, and (ii) the interplay of one resonant and one amplifying gating variables. Increasing levels of an amplifying current cause (i) a response amplification if the amplifying current is faster than the resonant current, (ii) resonance and phasonance attenuation and annihilation if the amplifying and resonant currents have identical dynamics, and (iii) antiresonance and antiphasonance if the amplifying current is slower than the resonant current. We investigate the underlying mechanisms by extending the envelope-plane diagram approach developed in previous work (for 2D systems) to three dimensions to include the additional gating variable, and constructing the corresponding envelope curves in these envelope-space diagrams. We find that antiresonance and antiphasonance emerge as the result of an asymptotic boundary layer problem in the frequency domain created by the different balances between the intrinsic time constants of the cell and the input frequency f as it changes. For large enough values of f the envelope curves are quasi-2D and the impedance profile decreases with the input frequency. In contrast, for f ≪ 1 the dynamics are quasi-1D and the impedance profile increases above the limiting value in the other regime. Antiresonance is created because the continuity of the solution requires the impedance profile to connect the portions belonging to the two regimes. If in doing so the phase profile crosses the zero value, then antiphasonance is also generated.

Keywords:  Asymptotics; Boundary layer in frequency domain; Negative feedback; Neuron model; Oscillations; Positive feedback; Preferred frequency response; Preferred phase response

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28569367     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-017-0646-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  51 in total

Review 1.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; Y Yarom
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Channel noise is essential for perithreshold oscillations in entorhinal stellate neurons.

Authors:  Alan D Dorval; John A White
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Subthreshold membrane-potential resonances shape spike-train patterns in the entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  T A Engel; L Schimansky-Geier; A V M Herz; S Schreiber; I Erchova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Subthreshold oscillations and resonant behavior: two manifestations of the same mechanism.

Authors:  I Lampl; Y Yarom
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Subthreshold amplitude and phase resonance in models of quadratic type: nonlinear effects generated by the interplay of resonant and amplifying currents.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Contribution of near-threshold currents to intrinsic oscillatory activity in rat medial entorhinal cortex layer II stellate cells.

Authors:  Anne Boehlen; Christian Henneberger; Uwe Heinemann; Irina Erchova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The membrane potential waveform of bursting pacemaker neurons is a predictor of their preferred frequency and the network cycle frequency.

Authors:  Hua-an Tseng; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The ionic mechanism of membrane potential oscillations and membrane resonance in striatal LTS interneurons.

Authors:  S C Song; J A Beatty; C J Wilson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Subthreshold oscillations and resonant frequency in guinea-pig cortical neurons: physiology and modelling.

Authors:  Y Gutfreund; Y yarom; I Segev
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Membrane resonance enables stable and robust gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Vasile V Moca; Danko Nikolic; Wolf Singer; Raul C Mureşan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Active membrane conductances and morphology of a collision detection neuron broaden its impedance profile and improve discrimination of input synchrony.

Authors:  Richard B Dewell; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Membrane potential resonance in non-oscillatory neurons interacts with synaptic connectivity to produce network oscillations.

Authors:  Andrea Bel; Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Spiking resonances in models with the same slow resonant and fast amplifying currents but different subthreshold dynamic properties.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Frequency-dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Mechanisms of generation of membrane potential resonance in a neuron with multiple resonant ionic currents.

Authors:  David M Fox; Hua-An Tseng; Tomasz G Smolinski; Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.