Literature DB >> 27385799

Membrane potential resonance frequency directly influences network frequency through electrical coupling.

Yinbo Chen1, Xinping Li1, Horacio G Rotstein2, Farzan Nadim3.   

Abstract

Oscillatory networks often include neurons with membrane potential resonance, exhibiting a peak in the voltage amplitude as a function of current input at a nonzero (resonance) frequency (fres). Although fres has been correlated to the network frequency (fnet) in a variety of systems, a causal relationship between the two has not been established. We examine the hypothesis that combinations of biophysical parameters that shift fres, without changing other attributes of the impedance profile, also shift fnet in the same direction. We test this hypothesis, computationally and experimentally, in an electrically coupled network consisting of intrinsic oscillator (O) and resonator (R) neurons. We use a two-cell model of such a network to show that increasing fres of R directly increases fnet and that this effect becomes more prominent if the amplitude of resonance is increased. Notably, the effect of fres on fnet is independent of the parameters that define the oscillator or the combination of parameters in R that produce the shift in fres, as long as this combination produces the same impedance vs. frequency relationship. We use the dynamic clamp technique to experimentally verify the model predictions by connecting a model resonator to the pacemaker pyloric dilator neurons of the crab Cancer borealis pyloric network using electrical synapses and show that the pyloric network frequency can be shifted by changing fres in the resonator. Our results provide compelling evidence that fres and resonance amplitude strongly influence fnet, and therefore, modulators may target these attributes to modify rhythmic activity.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational modeling; dynamic clamp; oscillations; resonance; stomatogastric

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27385799      PMCID: PMC5144696          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00361.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  49 in total

Review 1.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; Y Yarom
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Subthreshold oscillations and resonant behavior: two manifestations of the same mechanism.

Authors:  I Lampl; Y Yarom
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  The frequency preference of neurons and synapses in a recurrent oscillatory network.

Authors:  Hua-an Tseng; Diana Martinez; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A mechanism for production of phase shifts in a pattern generator.

Authors:  J S Eisen; E Marder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The membrane potential waveform of bursting pacemaker neurons is a predictor of their preferred frequency and the network cycle frequency.

Authors:  Hua-an Tseng; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Multiple mechanisms switch an electrically coupled, synaptically inhibited neuron between competing rhythmic oscillators.

Authors:  Gabrielle J Gutierrez; Timothy O'Leary; Eve Marder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Subthreshold oscillations and resonant frequency in guinea-pig cortical neurons: physiology and modelling.

Authors:  Y Gutfreund; Y yarom; I Segev
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Different sensory systems share projection neurons but elicit distinct motor patterns.

Authors:  Dawn M Blitz; Mark P Beenhakker; Michael P Nusbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.709

9.  Somatic versus dendritic resonance: differential filtering of inputs through non-uniform distributions of active conductances.

Authors:  Ekaterina Zhuchkova; Michiel W H Remme; Susanne Schreiber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Membrane resonance enables stable and robust gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Vasile V Moca; Danko Nikolic; Wolf Singer; Raul C Mureşan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  10 in total

1.  Membrane potential resonance in non-oscillatory neurons interacts with synaptic connectivity to produce network oscillations.

Authors:  Andrea Bel; Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Resonance modulation, annihilation and generation of anti-resonance and anti-phasonance in 3D neuronal systems: interplay of resonant and amplifying currents with slow dynamics.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Spiking resonances in models with the same slow resonant and fast amplifying currents but different subthreshold dynamic properties.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Frequency-dependent responses of neuronal models to oscillatory inputs in current versus voltage clamp.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 5.  The voltage and spiking responses of subthreshold resonant neurons to structured and fluctuating inputs: persistence and loss of resonance and variability.

Authors:  Rodrigo F O Pena; Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Mechanisms of generation of membrane potential resonance in a neuron with multiple resonant ionic currents.

Authors:  David M Fox; Hua-An Tseng; Tomasz G Smolinski; Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Gap junction plasticity as a mechanism to regulate network-wide oscillations.

Authors:  Guillaume Pernelle; Wilten Nicola; Claudia Clopath
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Flexible resonance in prefrontal networks with strong feedback inhibition.

Authors:  Jason S Sherfey; Salva Ardid; Joachim Hass; Michael E Hasselmo; Nancy J Kopell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Frequency-preference response in covalent modification cycles under substrate sequestration conditions.

Authors:  Juliana Reves Szemere; Horacio G Rotstein; Alejandra C Ventura
Journal:  NPJ Syst Biol Appl       Date:  2021-08-17

10.  Inter-Animal Variability in Activity Phase Is Constrained by Synaptic Dynamics in an Oscillatory Network.

Authors:  Haroon Anwar; Diana Martinez; Dirk Bucher; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-07-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.