Literature DB >> 25411033

A blended- rather than whole-lentil meal with or without α-galactosidase mildly increases healthy adults' appetite but not their glycemic response.

Katherene O-B Anguah1, Brittany S Wonnell2, Wayne W Campbell1, George P McCabe3, Megan A McCrory4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disrupting the physical structure of pulses by blending them or by using a digestive supplement (α-galactosidase) to reduce intestinal discomfort could potentially negate the previously observed beneficial effects of whole pulses of lowering appetitive and glycemic responses because of more rapid digestion.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that blended lentils, α-galactosidase, or both increase postprandial appetite and blood glucose responses vs. whole lentils.
METHODS: Men and women [n = 12; means ± SDs body mass index (kg/m(2)): 23.3 ± 3.1; aged 28 ± 10 y] consumed breakfast meals containing whole (W), blended (B), or no lentils [control (C)], each with 3 α-galactosidase or placebo capsules in a randomized, crossover, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Between each test day there was a 3- to 5-d washout period.
RESULTS: Mixed-model ANOVA showed effects of meal on postprandial appetite and glucose (P = 0.0001-0.031). The B meal resulted in higher postprandial appetite ratings than did the W meal but not the C meal for hunger, desire to eat, and prospective consumption (Δ = 0.4-0.5 points; P = 0.002-0.044). Postprandial glucose concentration was 4.5 mg/dL lower for the B meal than for the C meal (P < 0.0001) but did not differ from the W meal. There were no main effects of α-galactosidase, but there were meal × α-galactosidase interaction effects, with a greater postprandial desire to eat and lower postprandial fullness with the B meal than with the 2 other meals in the placebo condition but not in the α-galactosidase condition.
CONCLUSIONS: Blending lentils increased appetite (∼6%), but not glycemic response, compared with whole lentils, whereas α-galactosidase did not. Both B and W meals may be consumed (with or without an α-galactosidase supplement) with little impact on appetite, without increasing glycemic response. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02110511.
© 2014 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lentils; appetite; glucose; humans; α-galactosidase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411033      PMCID: PMC4230209          DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.195545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  43 in total

1.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

2.  Food intake and satiety following a serving of pulses in young men: effect of processing, recipe, and pulse variety.

Authors:  Christina L Wong; Rebecca C Mollard; Tasleem A Zafar; Bohdan L Luhovyy; G Harvey Anderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 3.  Dietary (sensory) variety and energy balance.

Authors:  Megan A McCrory; Aoife Burke; Susan B Roberts
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-06-21

4.  The rate of starch hydrolysis in vitro does not predict the metabolic responses to legumes in vivo.

Authors:  K O'Dea; S Wong
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Food form and portion size affect postprandial appetite sensations and hormonal responses in healthy, nonobese, older adults.

Authors:  Heather J Leidy; John W Apolzan; Richard D Mattes; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Liquid and solid meal replacement products differentially affect postprandial appetite and food intake in older adults.

Authors:  April J Stull; John W Apolzan; Anna E Thalacker-Mercer; Heidi B Iglay; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-07

7.  The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal.

Authors:  Julie E Flood-Obbagy; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Effects of food form and timing of ingestion on appetite and energy intake in lean young adults and in young adults with obesity.

Authors:  Richard D Mattes; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-03

9.  A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.

Authors:  Linda E Thomas; Michael P Kane; Gary Bakst; Robert S Busch; Robert A Hamilton; Jill M Abelseth
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Evaluation of a new air displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition.

Authors:  M A McCrory; T D Gomez; E M Bernauer; P A Molé
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Pulses in Cardiovascular Disease Risk for Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Patricia K Lukus; Katarina M Doma; Alison M Duncan
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2020-05-25

2.  The impact of starchy food structure on postprandial glycemic response and appetite: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized crossover trials.

Authors:  Mingzhu Cai; Bowen Dou; Jennifer E Pugh; Aaron M Lett; Gary S Frost
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Pulse consumption improves indices of glycemic control in adults with and without type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of acute and long-term randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Maryam S Hafiz; Matthew D Campbell; Lauren L O'Mahoney; Melvin Holmes; Caroline Orfila; Christine Boesch
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.