| Literature DB >> 25410681 |
Xiao-Yan Duan, Qin Pan, Shi-Yan Yan, Wen-Jin Ding, Jian-Gao Fan1, Liang Qiao.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25410681 PMCID: PMC4240894 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-014-0195-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Effect of high-saturate-fat diet and DEN on nutrition status, serum lipid profile and liver function test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | NCD | 8 | 379.00 ± 27.83 | 24.13 ± 0.64 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 1.47 ± 0.17 | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 1.01 ± 0.13 | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 42.38 ± 7.76 | 133.75 ± 22.30 | 35.24 ± 1.13 |
| HFD | 8 | 486.88 ± 34.50 | 26.55 ± 0.69 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 2.13 ± 0.50 | 0.38 ± 0.34 | 1.45 ± 0.25# | 1.39 ± 0.36# | 48.38 ± 14.29 | 172.63 ± 59.49 | 36.18 ± 2.20 | |
| NCD + DEN | 7 | 276.9 ± 40.8^& | 23.79 ± 1.19 | 0.49 ± 0.05^^&& | 2.26 ± 0.37^ | 0.47 ± 0.18^ | 1.17 ± 0.35 | 1.32 ± 0.25^ | 170.01 ± 77.55^& | 364.17 ± 261.10 | 36.16 ± 2.34 | |
| HFD + DEN | 7 | 363.13 ± 21.91▲▲ $$ | 25.14 ± 0.75▲▲ | 0.57 ± 0.03▲▲$$ | 4.05 ± 1.41▲ | 0.54 ± 0.22 | 2.27 ± 0.48▲▲** | 2.51 ± 1.00▲** | 144.90 ± 22.83**$$ | 187.74 ± 17.89 | 38.96 ± 1.29▲*$ | |
| 12 | NCD | 8 | 429.50 ± 19.32 | 25.81 ± 0.70 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 1.58 ± 0.14 | 0.35 ± 0.15 | 1.13 ± 0.15 | 1.02 ± 0.10 | 36.63 ± 18.12 | 131.75 ± 28.74 | 37.25 ± 2.31 |
| HFD | 8 | 531.63 ± 36.62 | 27.53 ± 0.44 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 2.52 ± 0.55# | 0.30 ± 0.11 | 1.82 ± 0.30## | 1.76 ± 0.42# | 166.38 ± 72.26## | 235.00 ± 58.89## | 36.95 ± 2.59 | |
| NCD + DEN | 7 | 289.9 ± 65.6^^&& | 23.71 ± 2.06 | 0.51 ± 0.04^^&& | 2.55 ± 0.40^ | 0.46 ± 0.13 | 1.32 ± 0.15 | 1.54 ± 0.18^ | 118.64 ± 20.55^^ | 258.71 ± 48.22^^ | 34.57 ± 3.31 | |
| HFD + DEN | 7 | 384.3 ± 28.9▲▲$$ | 25.43 ± 0.53 | 0.59 ± 0.04▲▲$$ | 4.64 ± 0.79▲▲** | 0.59 ± 0.14*$ | 2.77 ± 0.23▲▲** | 2.88 ± 0.56▲▲** | 149.69 ± 35.13** | 272.72 ± 102.56** | 38.90 ± 1.17▲ | |
| 14 | NCD | 8 | 442.20 ± 49.66 | 26.00 ± 0.91 | 0.66 ± 0.08 | 1.75 ± 0.16 | 0.28 ± 0.18 | 1.12 ± 0.16 | 1.09 ± 0.10 | 53.00 ± 9.62 | 148.56 ± 27.05 | 37.15 ± 1.71 |
| HFD | 8 | 571.1 ± 36.58## | 27.25 ± 0.75# | 0.77 ± 0.03# | 2.90 ± 0.63# | 0.39 ± 0.14 | 1.93 ± 0.31## | 2.62 ± 0.63## | 139.10 ± 63.72# | 260.00 ± 90.15# | 36.90 ± 0.91 | |
| NCD + DEN | 9 | 285.72 ± 53.95^^&& | 23.94 ± 1.51^^ | 0.50 ± 0.05^^&& | 3.16 ± 0.63^^ | 0.63 ± 0.23^ | 1.61 ± 0.36 | 1.77 ± 0.37^^& | 162.03 ± 34.72^^ | 365.11 ± 70.68^^ | 36.89 ± 3.07 | |
| HFD + DEN | 10 | 386.26 ± 47.71▲▲ $$ | 25.75 ± 0.98▲▲ | 0.58 ± 0.04▲▲$$ | 4.85 ± 0.95▲▲**$$ | 0.56 ± 0.20* | 2.65 ± 0.25▲▲**$ | 3.04 ± 0.69▲▲** | 151.86 ± 23.54** | 248.90 ± 68.52▲▲* | 40.00 ± 1.96▲*$ |
NCD: normal chow diet; HFD: high saturate fat diet; DEN: diethylinitrosamine; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALB, albumin.
HFD + DEN vs NCD + DEN: ▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01; HFD + DEN vs NCD: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; HFD + DEN vs HFD: $ P < 0.05, $$ P < 0.01; NCD + DEN vs NCD: ^ P < 0.05, ^^ P < 0.01; NCD + DEN vs HFD: & P < 0.05, && P < 0.01; HFD vs NCD: # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01.
Figure 1Histological features by H&E and VG staining. Liver tissues of H&E staining displayed the well differentiated HCC (A, 10w) and middle differentiated HCC (B, 12w) in DEN + CD group, hepatic steatosis (C, 10w) and well differentiated HCC with steatosis (D, 12w) in DEN + HFD group. Then H&E staining was performed in liver tissues of NCD (E, n = 8), HFD (F, n = 8), NCD + DEN (G, n = 9), and HFD + DEN (H, n = 10) groups after 14 weeks. Liver tissues of VG staining were obtained from rats fed on NCD (I, n = 8), HFD (J, n = 8), NCD + DEN (K, n = 7), and HFD + DEN (L, n = 7) for 10 weeks. Magnification: ×200.
Figure 2Gross specimen of rat liver. Liver specimen from NCD (A, 14 weeks (n = 8) ), HFD (B, 14 weeks (n = 8)), NCD + DEN (C, 10 weeks (n = 7); E, 12 weeks (n = 7); G, 14 weeks (n = 9)) and HFD + DEN groups (D, 10 weeks (n = 7); F, 12 weeks (n = 7); H, 14 weeks (n = 10)) displays the effect of DEN and/or HFD on carcinogenesis.
High-saturate-fat diet delayed DEN-related liver fibrosis
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 10 | NCD | 8 | 0 | 8 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| HFD | 8 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 8 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| NCD + DEN | 7 | 12.1 ± 2.2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (100) | |
| HFD + DEN | 7 | 10.7 ± 2.9 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (14.3) | 2 (28.6) | 4 (57.1) | |
| 12 | NCD | 8 | 0 | 8 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| HFD | 8 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| NCD + DEN | 7 | 14.9 ± 4.5 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (100) | |
| HFD + DEN | 7 | 11.0 ± 1.2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | |
| 14 | NCD | 8 | 0 | 8 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| HFD | 8 | 3.6 ± 1.9 | 6 (75.0) | 2 (25.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| NCD + DEN | 9 | 15.1 ± 3.1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (100) | |
| HFD + DEN | 10 | 14.0 ± 2.3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (10) | 9 (90) | |
NCD, normal chow diet; HFD, high saturate fat diet; DEN, diethylinitrosamine; HAI, hepatitis activity index.
High-saturate-fat diet delayed DEN-induced HCC formation (week 14)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| NCD + DEN | 1 | 8 | 15.33 ± 6.32 | 2.33 ± 1.32 | 3196.86 ± 7772.85 |
| HFD + DEN | 4 | 6 | 7.80 ± 4.37** | 1.20 ± 0.79* | 513.34 ± 1132.90** |
NCD: normal chow diet; HFD: high saturate fat diet; DEN: diethylinitrosamine.
HFD + DEN vs NCD + DEN: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 3HFD reduces the hepatic expression of PCNA, TNF-α, and IL-6. (A, B) Hepatic expression of PCNA by Western blot (A) and immunohistochemistry (B). Compared to rats from NCD + DEN group (10w: n = 7, 12w: n = 7, 14w: n = 9), rats from the HFD + DEN group (10w: n = 7, 12w: n = 7, 14w: n = 10) exhibited marked decrease in the expression of PCNA, particularly at weeks 10 and 12. Arrows indicate the liver cells positive for PCNA. Magnification: ×400. Hepatic expression of TNF-α (C), and IL-6 (D) by real-time PCR. *P <0.05.
Figure 4HFD predisposes rat to hepatic apoptosis. Hepatic level of caspase-3 was determined by ELISA. Increased hepatic level of caspase-3 was found in the HFD + DEN group (10w: n = 7, 12w: n = 7, 14w: n = 10) than in the NCD + DEN groups (10w: n = 7, 12w: n = 7, 14w: n = 9). *: P <0.05.