| Literature DB >> 25409901 |
Akihiko Tanaka1, Megumi Jinno2, Kuniaki Hirai3, Yoshito Miyata4, Hiroko Mizuma5, Munehiro Yamaguchi6, Shin Ohta7, Yoshio Watanabe8, Mayumi Yamamoto9, Shintaro Suzuki10, Takuya Yokoe11, Mitsuru Adachi12, Hironori Sagara13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin (Ig) E is well-known to play a critical role in allergic diseases. We investigated the association between longitudinal change in total IgE level and the asthma control in patients with adult asthma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25409901 PMCID: PMC4245732 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-014-0144-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Distribution of the longitudinal change in IgE across 0.25 in patients with adult asthma.
Subject demographics and patient characteristics
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 61.3 ± 14.6* | 59.5 ± 13.7** | 67.8 ± 11.2 | 0.011† |
| Gender (M/F) | 27/36 | 21/29 | 14/27 | NS |
| BMI | 23.7 ± 0.4 | 23.2 ± 0.5 | 22.1 ± 0.5 | NS |
| Adult onset, n (%) | 45 (71.4) | 39 (78.0) | 34 (82.9) | NS |
| Smoking status, never/ex/current (%) | 46/12/5 (73.0/19.1/7.9) | 38/8/4/ (76.0/16.0/8.0) | 26/11/4/ (63.4/26.8/9.8) | NS |
| Atopic type, n (%) | 42 (66.6) | 30 (60.0) | 21 (51.2) | NS |
| Pet owner, n (%) | 16 (25.4) | 11(22.0) | 9 (21.9) | NS |
| Allergic rhinitis, n (%) | 30 (47.6) | 23 (46.0) | 15 (36.5) | NS |
| Pollinosis, n (%) | 27 (42.8) | 24 (48.0) | 21 (51.2) | NS |
| Treatment with higher than Step 4, (%)¶ | 17 (26.9) | 14 (28.0) | 20 (48.78) | 0.045‡ |
| OCS on demand, none/rare/frequent (%) ‖ | 35/22/6 (55.6/34.9/9.5) | 40/8/2 (80.0/16.0/4.0) | 23/12/6 (56.1/29.3/14.6) | 0.046‡ |
| Episode of acute exacerbation within a year | 15 (23.8) | 7 (14.0) | 15 (36.6) | 0.042‡ |
| Eosinophils, % of WBC | 5.45 ± 0.48 | 4.75 ± 0.54 | 5.49 ± 0.60 | NS |
| Pre-IgE, IU/L | 1020.6 ± 1654.8 | 873.5 ± 2018.3 | 695.8 ± 2555.9 | - |
| Pre-IgE (log-transforn), IU/L | 2.59 ± 0.08*** | 2.40 ± 0.09 | 2.22 ± 0.10 | 0.014† |
| FeNO, ppb | 52.2 ± 5.6 | 50.7 ± 6.3 | 50.5 ± 7.0 | NS |
Values are Mean ± SDs or medians (%).
†p values given for the ANOVA.
‡p values given for the Pearson χ 2 test.
*p < 0.05 or **p < 0.01 or ***p < 0.001 versus increase.
¶ Treatment step is based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline.
‖ none: never, rare: less than once a month, frequent: once or more a month.
OCS: oral corticosteroids.
Figure 2ACT scores of patients with asthma. Mean ACT scores are shown on the top of the bars. ACT comprises five questions to assess activity limitation, shortness of breath, nighttime symptoms, use of rescue medication, and patient’s overall rating of asthma control over the previous 4 weeks. *: Significant difference (P <0.01) versus the unchanged IgE group, as determined by t-test following a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Figure 3Distribution of patients according to asthma control level. Asthma was identified as controlled, partly controlled or uncontrolled based on the categorical scale of Global Initiative for Asthma. Low data were shown in the bars. A χ 2 test demonstrated a significant difference between the groups (P =0.014).
Figure 4Pulmonary function tests in patients with asthma. %FVC (A), %FEV1 (B), and FEV1% (C) are shown. The highest value from three technically satisfactory attempts was recorded. *: Significant difference (P <0.01) versus the indicated group, as determined by t-test following a one-way ANOVA.
Numbers and percentages of patients positive for antigen-specific IgE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| decrease (N = 63) | 42/63 (66.6%) | 29/63 (46.0%) | 5/63 (7.9%) | 11/63 (17.4%) | 4/63 (6.3%) | 3/63 (4.7%) | 11/47 (23.4%) | 11/47 (23.4%) | 13/50 (26.0%) | 6/47 (12.7%) |
| no change (N = 50) | 31/50 (62.0%) | 32/50 (64.0%) | 1/50 (2.0%) | 8/50 (16.0%) | 5/50 (10.0%) | 1/50 (2.0%) | 7/33 (21.2%) | 8/33 (24.2%) | 10/34 (29.4%) | 4/22 (18.1%) |
| increase (N = 41) | 22/41 (53.6%) | 24/41 (58.5%) | 6/41 (14.6%) | 10/41 (24.3%) | 15/41 (36.5) | 5/41 (12.1%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | 7/31 (22.5%) | 6/29 (31.0%) |
The denominator is the number of tested patients and the numerator is the number of patients who had a positive result. *: A χ 2 test demonstrated a significant difference between the groups (P <0.001).