BACKGROUND: Little is known about longitudinal trends in the prevalence of allergen skin sensitization in the general population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the change in prevalence of allergen skin sensitization over a 9-year period in a cohort of adults and hence to determine whether cross-sectional differences in prevalence between age groups are due to an aging or cohort effect. METHODS: In 1991 and 2000, we measured skin sensitization, defined as a wheal diameter of 3 mm or larger than that elicited by a saline control, to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat fur, mixed grass, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Cladosporium herbarum in a cohort of 1339 adults from Nottingham aged between 18 and 71 years in 1991. Subjects were divided into six 9-year successive birth cohorts, and the effects of birth cohort and the within-subject change from 1991 to 2000 were analyzed in a generalized estimating equation logit model. RESULTS: The unadjusted prevalence of sensitization to any allergen was 30.5% in 1991 and 31.8% in 2000. In cross-sectional analyses the prevalence of sensitization decreased with increasing age at both surveys (risk ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-3.17 for 18- to 26-year-old patients relative to 63- to 70-year-old patients in the 1991 survey). In longitudinal analysis there was no within-subject change in sensitization from 1991 to 2000 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97-1.19), but there was a significant cohort effect (adjusted odds ratio per successive 9 year cohort, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.18-1.37). CONCLUSION: The cross-sectional decrease in allergen sensitization with age in the general population arises predominantly from a secular increase in sensitization prevalence with successive birth cohorts and not to a loss of sensitization within subjects over time. As a result of this cohort effect, the prevalence of allergic sensitization has increased in this general adult population sample.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about longitudinal trends in the prevalence of allergen skin sensitization in the general population. OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the change in prevalence of allergen skin sensitization over a 9-year period in a cohort of adults and hence to determine whether cross-sectional differences in prevalence between age groups are due to an aging or cohort effect. METHODS: In 1991 and 2000, we measured skin sensitization, defined as a wheal diameter of 3 mm or larger than that elicited by a saline control, to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat fur, mixed grass, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Cladosporium herbarum in a cohort of 1339 adults from Nottingham aged between 18 and 71 years in 1991. Subjects were divided into six 9-year successive birth cohorts, and the effects of birth cohort and the within-subject change from 1991 to 2000 were analyzed in a generalized estimating equation logit model. RESULTS: The unadjusted prevalence of sensitization to any allergen was 30.5% in 1991 and 31.8% in 2000. In cross-sectional analyses the prevalence of sensitization decreased with increasing age at both surveys (risk ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-3.17 for 18- to 26-year-old patients relative to 63- to 70-year-old patients in the 1991 survey). In longitudinal analysis there was no within-subject change in sensitization from 1991 to 2000 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97-1.19), but there was a significant cohort effect (adjusted odds ratio per successive 9 year cohort, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.18-1.37). CONCLUSION: The cross-sectional decrease in allergen sensitization with age in the general population arises predominantly from a secular increase in sensitization prevalence with successive birth cohorts and not to a loss of sensitization within subjects over time. As a result of this cohort effect, the prevalence of allergic sensitization has increased in this general adult population sample.
Authors: Michael Bailey; Karin Haverson; Bevis Miller; Philip Jones; Isabel Sola; Luis Enjuanes; Christopher R Stokes Journal: Clin Diagn Lab Immunol Date: 2004-03
Authors: Lee A Albacker; Vinod Chaudhary; Ya-Jen Chang; Hye Young Kim; Ya-Ting Chuang; Muriel Pichavant; Rosemarie H DeKruyff; Paul B Savage; Dale T Umetsu Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Anahí Yáñez; Sang-Hoen Cho; Joan B Soriano; Lanny J Rosenwasser; Gustavo J Rodrigo; Klaus F Rabe; Stephen Peters; Akio Niimi; Dennis K Ledford; Rohit Katial; Leonardo M Fabbri; Juan C Celedón; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Paula Busse; Louis-Phillippe Boulet; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; Qutayba Hamid; Claus Bachert; Ruby Pawankar; Stephen T Holgate Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Antonios Patelis; Maria Gunnbjörnsdottir; Magnus P Borres; Peter Burney; Thorarinn Gislason; Kjell Torén; Bertil Forsberg; Kjell Alving; Andrei Malinovschi; Christer Janson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: André F S Amaral; Roger B Newson; Michael J Abramson; Josep M Antó; Roberto Bono; Angelo G Corsico; Roberto de Marco; Pascal Demoly; Bertil Forsberg; Thorarinn Gislason; Joachim Heinrich; Ismael Huerta; Christer Janson; Rain Jõgi; Jeong-Lim Kim; José Maldonado; Jesús Martinez-Moratalla Rovira; Catherine Neukirch; Dennis Nowak; Isabelle Pin; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Chantal Raherison-Semjen; Cecilie Svanes; Isabel Urrutia Landa; Ronald van Ree; Serge A Versteeg; Joost Weyler; Jan-Paul Zock; Peter G J Burney; Deborah L Jarvis Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 10.793