STUDY RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Via genetic alterations, malignant transformation and proliferation are associated with extensive alterations of mitochondrial energy metabolism of tumor cells. Thus, inhibition of the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism of tumor cells may be an effective therapy for cancers. This study performed translational assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction of pancreatic cancer from in vitro gene microarray and animal efficacy studies, to early clinical studies, via the novel tumor-specific anti-mitochondrial agent, CPI-613. METHODS: The gene profiles of BxPC-3 human pancreatic tumor cells and non-transformed NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblast cells (negative control), after CPI-613 or sham treatment, were assessed and compared using microarray technique. The anti-cancer efficacies of CPI-613 and Gemcitabine were assessed and compared in mice with xenograft from inoculation of BxPC-3 human pancreatic tumor cells, based on the degree of tumor growth inhibition and prolongation of survival when compared to vehicle treatment. The anti-cancer activities, according to overall survival (OS), of CPI-613 alone and in combination with Gemcitabine were assessed in patients with Stage IV pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Microarray studies indicated that CPI-613 down-regulated the expression of Cyclin D3, E1, E2, F, A2, B1 and CDK2 genes of BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells but not non-transformed NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblast cells (negative control). In mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts, four weekly intraperitoneal injections of either CPI-613 (25 mg/kg/administration) or Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg/administration) inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival when compared to vehicle treatment. The degree of tumor growth inhibition was ~2×, and prolongation of survival was ~4×, greater with CPI-613 treatment than with Gemcitabine treatment. In patients with Stage IV advanced pancreatic cancer, CPI-613 at 420-1,300 mg/m(2), given twice weekly for three weeks followed by a week of rest (i.e., 3-week-on-1-week-off) as monotherapy, provided median OS of 15 months in three patients. CPI-613 at 150-320 mg/m(2) given twice weekly on the 3-week-on-1-week-off dosing schedule, coinciding with Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) given once weekly on the 3-week-on-1-week-off dosing schedule, provided median OS of 17.8 months in four patients. These median OS values from CPI-613 monotherapy and CPI-613 + Gemcitabine treatment tend to be longer than those in patients treated with Abraxane + Gemcitabine combination or FOLFININOX (median OS ~12 months). CONCLUSIONS: The dysfunctional mitochondria of pancreatic cancer cells was translationable from in vitro gene alteration and animal tumor model studies to patients with advanced Stage IV pancreatic cancer, as reflected by the anti-cancer activities of the tumor-specific anti-mitochondrial agent, CPI-613, in these studies.
STUDY RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Via genetic alterations, malignant transformation and proliferation are associated with extensive alterations of mitochondrial energy metabolism of tumor cells. Thus, inhibition of the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism of tumor cells may be an effective therapy for cancers. This study performed translational assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction of pancreatic cancer from in vitro gene microarray and animal efficacy studies, to early clinical studies, via the novel tumor-specific anti-mitochondrial agent, CPI-613. METHODS: The gene profiles of BxPC-3 humanpancreatic tumor cells and non-transformed NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblast cells (negative control), after CPI-613 or sham treatment, were assessed and compared using microarray technique. The anti-cancer efficacies of CPI-613 and Gemcitabine were assessed and compared in mice with xenograft from inoculation of BxPC-3 humanpancreatic tumor cells, based on the degree of tumor growth inhibition and prolongation of survival when compared to vehicle treatment. The anti-cancer activities, according to overall survival (OS), of CPI-613 alone and in combination with Gemcitabine were assessed in patients with Stage IV pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Microarray studies indicated that CPI-613 down-regulated the expression of Cyclin D3, E1, E2, F, A2, B1 and CDK2 genes of BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer cells but not non-transformed NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblast cells (negative control). In mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts, four weekly intraperitoneal injections of either CPI-613 (25 mg/kg/administration) or Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg/administration) inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival when compared to vehicle treatment. The degree of tumor growth inhibition was ~2×, and prolongation of survival was ~4×, greater with CPI-613 treatment than with Gemcitabine treatment. In patients with Stage IV advanced pancreatic cancer, CPI-613 at 420-1,300 mg/m(2), given twice weekly for three weeks followed by a week of rest (i.e., 3-week-on-1-week-off) as monotherapy, provided median OS of 15 months in three patients. CPI-613 at 150-320 mg/m(2) given twice weekly on the 3-week-on-1-week-off dosing schedule, coinciding with Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) given once weekly on the 3-week-on-1-week-off dosing schedule, provided median OS of 17.8 months in four patients. These median OS values from CPI-613 monotherapy and CPI-613 + Gemcitabine treatment tend to be longer than those in patients treated with Abraxane + Gemcitabine combination or FOLFININOX (median OS ~12 months). CONCLUSIONS: The dysfunctional mitochondria of pancreatic cancer cells was translationable from in vitro gene alteration and animal tumor model studies to patients with advanced Stage IV pancreatic cancer, as reflected by the anti-cancer activities of the tumor-specific anti-mitochondrial agent, CPI-613, in these studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
CPI-613; cancer mitochondrial metabolism; translational
Authors: J E Staunton; D K Slonim; H A Coller; P Tamayo; M J Angelo; J Park; U Scherf; J K Lee; W O Reinhold; J N Weinstein; J P Mesirov; E S Lander; T R Golub Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Baojin Fu; Shinichi Yachida; Mingde Luo; Hisashi Abe; Clark M Henderson; Felip Vilardell; Zheng Wang; Jesse W Keller; Priya Banerjee; Joseph M Herman; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Marc K Halushka; James R Eshleman; Marian Raben; Alison P Klein; Ralph H Hruban; Manuel Hidalgo; Daniel Laheru Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy S Pardee; King Lee; John Luddy; Claudia Maturo; Robert Rodriguez; Scott Isom; Lance D Miller; Kristin M Stadelman; Denise Levitan; David Hurd; Leslie R Ellis; Robin Harrelson; Megan Manuel; Sarah Dralle; Susan Lyerly; Bayard L Powell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Jason Song; Giovanni Parmiagiani; Charles J Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Scott E Kern Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amanda Blackford; Oscar K Serrano; Christopher L Wolfgang; Giovanni Parmigiani; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; D Williams Parsons; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; James R Eshleman; Michael Goggins; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Anirban Maitra; John L Cameron; Kelly Olino; Richard Schulick; Jordan Winter; Joseph M Herman; Daniel Laheru; Alison P Klein; Bert Vogelstein; Kenneth W Kinzler; Victor E Velculescu; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shawn D Stuart; Alexandra Schauble; Sunita Gupta; Adam D Kennedy; Brian R Keppler; Paul M Bingham; Zuzana Zachar Journal: Cancer Metab Date: 2014-03-10
Authors: Yogev Sela; Jinyang Li; Shivahamy Maheswaran; Robert Norgard; Salina Yuan; Maimon Hubbi; Miriam Doepner; Jimmy P Xu; Elaine S Ho; Clementina Mesaros; Colin Sheehan; Grace Croley; Alexander Muir; Ian A Blair; Ophir Shalem; Chi V Dang; Ben Z Stanger Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Silpa Gampala; Fenil Shah; Xiaoyu Lu; Hye-Ran Moon; Olivia Babb; Nikkitha Umesh Ganesh; George Sandusky; Emily Hulsey; Lee Armstrong; Amber L Mosely; Bumsoo Han; Mircea Ivan; Jing-Ruey Joanna Yeh; Mark R Kelley; Chi Zhang; Melissa L Fishel Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-08-10
Authors: Bethany R Mordhorst; Stephanie L Murphy; Rence M Ross; Melissa S Samuel; Shirley Rojas Salazar; Tieming Ji; Susanta K Behura; Kevin D Wells; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather Journal: Cell Reprogram Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Chiara Bellio; Celeste DiGloria; David R Spriggs; Rosemary Foster; Whitfield B Growdon; Bo R Rueda Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 6.639