Literature DB >> 25404183

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): an excellent tool in the follow-up of small renal masses treated with cryoablation.

Enrique Sanz1, Vital Hevia, Fernando Arias, José Javier Fabuel, Sara Álvarez, Rafael Rodríguez-Patrón, Victoria Gómez, Víctor Díez-Nicolás, Cristina González-Gordaliza, Francisco Javier Burgos.   

Abstract

Strict imaging follow-up is mandatory after cryoablation of small renal masses (SRMs). Although it uses ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic iodinated contrast, computed tomography (CT) is still the gold standard test. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a novel technique that informs in real time about renal perfusion avoiding radiation and nephrotoxicity. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes between CEUS and CT in the follow-up of SRMs treated with cryoablation, as well as to assess degree of agreement between them. This is a prospective observational study (May 2012 to December 2013) comparing CEUS and CT in 16 patients with SRMs cryoablated. The on-going protocol of the study includes a CT and CEUS 3 months after treatment and then every 6 months during 5 years. Local relapse was defined as the presence of contrast enhancement in the mass. All the CEUS were performed by a single experienced observer (E.S.). Degree of agreement was measured with kappa index. CEUS detected contrast enhancement in three patients (3/16, 18.8%) and CT in two patients (2/16, 12.5%). Degree of agreement between CEUS and CT, according to Landis-Koch classification, was 0.76 (CI 0.33-1.19; p = 0.0165), which is excellent and higher than expected by random. Sensitivity of the test is 93.75% (15/16). Median time of follow-up after cryoablation is 22 months (15.5-36.5). CEUS has an excellent agreement with CT and a high sensitivity in the follow-up of SRMs treated with cryosurgery, demonstrating its usefulness. Due to these encouraging results, it could become a reference test in the near future for monitoring SRMs after ablative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25404183     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-014-0469-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  20 in total

1.  Contrast enhancement on computed tomography after renal cryoablation: an evidence of treatment failure?

Authors:  Matvey Tsivian; Charles Y Kim; Jorge R Caso; Michael D Rosenberg; Rendon C Nelson; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Bibliographic review about the usefulness of ultrasound contrast media in the study of renal masses.

Authors:  Enrique Sanz Mayayo; Vital Hevia Palacios; Fernando Arias Fúnez; Sara Alvarez Rodríguez; Rafael Rodríguez-Patrón Rodríguez; Teodoro Mayayo Dehesa; Francisco Javier Burgos Revilla
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.436

Review 3.  Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  J Ophir; K J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation of radiofrequency ablation of the kidney: reliable imaging of the thermolesion.

Authors:  D Brooke Johnson; David A Duchene; Grant D Taylor; Margaret S Pearle; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents in the Study of Kidney Function in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Kambiz Kalantarinia; Mark D Okusa
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Mech       Date:  2007

6.  Economic assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of focal liver lesions: a multicentre Italian experience.

Authors:  Laura Romanini; Matteo Passamonti; Luca Aiani; Paolo Cabassa; Giuseppina Raieli; Ilaria Montermini; Alberto Martegani; Luigi Grazioli; Fabrizio Calliada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Follow-up after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: contrast-enhanced sonography versus contrast-enhanced CT or MRI.

Authors:  Maria Franca Meloni; Michele Bertolotto; Chiara Alberzoni; Sergio Lazzaroni; Carlo Filice; Tito Livraghi; Giovanna Ferraioli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours. Part II: probe ablative therapy.

Authors:  Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Body CT scanning in young adults: examination indications, patient outcomes, and risk of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  Robert L Zondervan; Peter F Hahn; Cheryl A Sadow; Bob Liu; Susanna I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Ultrasonography of renal masses using contrast pulse sequence imaging: a pilot study.

Authors:  Margot H Wink; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Pilar Laguna; Brunolf W Lagerveld; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  8 in total

1.  Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Detects Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Setting of Chronic Renal Insufficiency.

Authors:  David T Tzou; Stefanie Weinstein; Manint Usawachintachit; John Mongan; Kirsten L Greene; Thomas Chi
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Renal Cell Carcinoma Ablation: Preprocedural, Intraprocedural, and Postprocedural Imaging.

Authors:  Winston B Joe; Jessica G Zarzour; Andrew J Gunn
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2019-11-29

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology.

Authors:  Sriharsha Gummadi; John R Eisenbrey; Andrej Lyshchik
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-11

4.  Evaluation of renal lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); a 10-year retrospective European single-centre analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Rübenthaler; G Negrão de Figueiredo; K Mueller-Peltzer; D A Clevert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound in Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Akbar N Ashrafi; Nima Nassiri; Inderbir S Gill; Mittul Gulati; Daniel Park; Andre L de Castro Abreu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 6.  How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Michalakis Averkiou; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Richard G Barr; Peter N Burns; Fabrizio Calliada; Vito Cantisani; Byung Choi; Maria C Chammas; Dirk-André Clevert; Michel Claudon; Jean-Michel Correas; Xin-Wu Cui; David Cosgrove; Mirko D'Onofrio; Yi Dong; JohnR Eisenbrey; Teresa Fontanilla; Odd Helge Gilja; Andre Ignee; Christian Jenssen; Yuko Kono; Masatoshi Kudo; Nathalie Lassau; Andrej Lyshchik; Maria Franca Meloni; Fuminori Moriyasu; Christian Nolsøe; Fabio Piscaglia; Maija Radzina; Adrian Saftoiu; Paul S Sidhu; Ioan Sporea; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Claude B Sirlin; Maria Stanczak; Hans-Peter Weskott; Stephanie R Wilson; Juergen Karl Willmann; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Jung Jang; Alexandar Vezeridis; Sue Westerway
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2018-02-07

7.  The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Lan; Hong-Chen Qu; Ning Li; Xing-Wang Zhu; Yi-Li Liu; Chun-Lai Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Use of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Pediatrics: A Case Series.

Authors:  Urban Čizmarević; Nina Hanžič; Matija Žerdin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.