Literature DB >> 23386731

Body CT scanning in young adults: examination indications, patient outcomes, and risk of radiation-induced cancer.

Robert L Zondervan1, Peter F Hahn, Cheryl A Sadow, Bob Liu, Susanna I Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify patient outcome and predicted cancer risk from body computed tomography (CT) in young adults and identify common indications for the imaging examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review boards of three institutions, with waiver of informed consent. The Research Patient Data Registry containing patient medical and billing records of three university-affiliated hospitals in a single metropolitan area was queried for patients 18-35 years old with a social security record who underwent chest or abdominopelvic CT from 2003 to 2007. Patients were analyzed according to body part imaged and scanning frequency. Mortality status and follow-up interval were recorded. The Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII method was used to calculate expected cancer incidence and death. Examination indication was determined with associated ICD-9 diagnostic code; 95% confidence intervals for percentages were calculated, and the binomial test was used to compare the difference between percentages.
RESULTS: In 21 945 patients, 16 851 chest and 24 112 abdominopelvic CT scans were obtained. During the average 5.5-year (± 0.1 [standard deviation]) follow-up, 7.1% (575 of 8057) of chest CT patients and 3.9% (546 of 13 888) of abdominal CT patients had died. In comparison, the predicted risk of dying from CT-induced cancer was 0.1% (five of 8057, P < .01) and 0.1% (eight of 12 472, P < .01), respectively. The most common examination indications were cancer and trauma for chest CT and abdominal pain, trauma, and cancer for abdominopelvic CT. Among patients without a cancer diagnosis in whom only one or two scans were obtained, mortality and predicted risk of radiation-induced cancer death were 3.6% (215 of 5914) and 0.05% (three of 5914, P < .01) for chest CT and 1.9% (219 of 11 291) and 0.1% (six of 11 291, P < .01) for abdominopelvic CT.
CONCLUSION: Among young adults undergoing body CT, risk of death from underlying morbidity is more than an order of magnitude greater than death from long-term radiation-induced cancer. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23386731     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Prioritizing examination-centered over patient-centered dose reduction: a hazard of institutional "benchmarking".

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; Michael E Gilmore; Mannudeep K Kalra; Chung Yin Kong; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  ALARA, image gently and CT-induced cancer.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14

Review 3.  Imaging-based screening: understanding the controversies.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Pari V Pandharipande; Janie M Lee; Constance D Lehman; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): an excellent tool in the follow-up of small renal masses treated with cryoablation.

Authors:  Enrique Sanz; Vital Hevia; Fernando Arias; José Javier Fabuel; Sara Álvarez; Rafael Rodríguez-Patrón; Victoria Gómez; Víctor Díez-Nicolás; Cristina González-Gordaliza; Francisco Javier Burgos
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Leukaemia risk associated with low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Christopher S Hourigan; Bipin N Savani
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 18.959

6.  Diagnostic yield of recommendations for chest CT examination prompted by outpatient chest radiographic findings.

Authors:  H Benjamin Harvey; Matthew D Gilman; Carol C Wu; Matthew S Cushing; Elkan F Halpern; Jing Zhao; Pari V Pandharipande; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Tarik K Alkasab
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Impact of Surveillance Imaging Modality on Survival After Recurrence in Patients With Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mullen; Yueh-Yun Chi; Emily Hibbitts; James R Anderson; Katarina J Steacy; James I Geller; Daniel M Green; Geetika Khanna; Marcio H Malogolowkin; Paul E Grundy; Conrad V Fernandez; Jeffrey S Dome
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine: part 2: benefits versus risk of CT.

Authors:  Sjirk J Westra
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

Review 9.  From 'Image Gently' to image intelligently: a personalized perspective on diagnostic radiation risk.

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

10.  Improved image quality of low-dose CT combining with iterative model reconstruction algorithm for response assessment in patients after treatment of malignant tumor.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Xin; Jingtao Shen; Shangwen Yang; Song Liu; Anning Hu; Bin Zhu; Yan Jiang; Baoxin Li; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.