Christoph G Dietrich1, Tanja Kottmann1, Manuela Alavi1. 1. Christoph G Dietrich, Manuela Alavi, Department of Medicine, Bethlehem Hospital, Teaching Hospital of Aachen University RWTH, 52222 Stolberg, Rhineland, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the effect of Lactobacillus-containing commercially available probiotic formulations in Germany during antibiotic treatment with an analysis of cost-efficiency. METHODS: In an observational study, we analyzed the frequency of bowel movements from 258 patients with infections in a primary care hospital in western Germany; 107 of the patients were offered aprobiotic drink containing at least 10 billion cultures of Lactobacillus casei DN 114001 b.i.d. The economic analysis was based on the costs of patient isolation vs preventive intake of probiotics. In a second pilot study, two commercially available probiotic drinks with different Lactobacillus casei strains were directly compared in 60 patients in a randomized controlled fashion. RESULTS: In the first study, the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) was significantly reduced in the intervention group (6.5% vs 28.4%), and the duration of AAD in days was significantly shorter (1.7 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 2.1). Higher age and creatinine and lower albumin were identified as risk factors for AAD. Ampicillin was the antibiotic with the highest rate of AAD (50%) and with the greatest AAD reduction in the probiotic group (4.2%, relative risk reduction 92%). The economic analysis showed a cost advantage of nearly 60000 €/year in a department of this size. The second study confirmed the preventive effect of the drink with Lactobacillus casei DN114001; however, there were no advantages found for the other tested probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a drink containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota, a commercially available probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus casei DN 114001 cost-efficiently reduces the prevalence of AAD during antibiotic treatment.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To investigate the effect of Lactobacillus-containing commercially available probiotic formulations in Germany during antibiotic treatment with an analysis of cost-efficiency. METHODS: In an observational study, we analyzed the frequency of bowel movements from 258 patients with infections in a primary care hospital in western Germany; 107 of the patients were offered a probiotic drink containing at least 10 billion cultures of Lactobacillus casei DN 114001 b.i.d. The economic analysis was based on the costs of patient isolation vs preventive intake of probiotics. In a second pilot study, two commercially available probiotic drinks with different Lactobacillus casei strains were directly compared in 60 patients in a randomized controlled fashion. RESULTS: In the first study, the incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) was significantly reduced in the intervention group (6.5% vs 28.4%), and the duration of AAD in days was significantly shorter (1.7 ± 1.1 vs 3.1 ± 2.1). Higher age and creatinine and lower albumin were identified as risk factors for AAD. Ampicillin was the antibiotic with the highest rate of AAD (50%) and with the greatest AAD reduction in the probiotic group (4.2%, relative risk reduction 92%). The economic analysis showed a cost advantage of nearly 60000 €/year in a department of this size. The second study confirmed the preventive effect of the drink with Lactobacillus casei DN114001; however, there were no advantages found for the other tested probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota. CONCLUSION: In contrast to a drink containing Lactobacillus casei Shirota, a commercially available probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus casei DN 114001 cost-efficiently reduces the prevalence of AAD during antibiotic treatment.
Authors: Joan Vinski; Mary Bertin; Zhiyuan Sun; Steven M Gordon; Daniel Bokar; James Merlino; Thomas G Fraser Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: A Eser; F Thalhammer; F Burghuber; C Högenauer; F Stockenhuber; C Wenisch; K Widhalm; W Reinisch Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Susanna Naggie; Becky A Miller; Kimberly B Zuzak; Brian W Pence; Ashley J Mayo; Bradly P Nicholson; Preeta K Kutty; L Clifford McDonald; Christopher W Woods Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Busra Aktas; Travis J De Wolfe; Kanokwan Tandee; Nasia Safdar; Benjamin J Darien; James L Steele Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240