Literature DB >> 14608302

Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report.

Sanjay Saint1, Leigh Ann Higgins, Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Carol Chenoweth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who are hospitalized and infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria are usually placed in contact isolation, which requires hospital personnel to gown and glove before patient examination. Contact isolation with active culture surveillance appears beneficial in preventing the spread of drug-resistant infections; however, contact isolation may impede the ability to examine patients as a result of the additional effort required to gown and glove. We assessed whether patients who are hospitalized and placed under contact precautions are examined less often by second- and third-year medical residents (ie, senior medical residents), and attending physicians during morning rounds.
METHOD: We conducted a prospective cohort study on the inpatient medical services at 2 university-affiliated medical centers. We directly observed senior medical residents and attending physicians during morning rounds, and recorded the contact precaution status of the patient and whether they were examined by either physician.
RESULTS: Of a total of 139 patients, 31 (22%) were in contact isolation. Senior medical residents examined 26 of 31 patients (84%) in contact isolation versus 94 of 108 patients (87%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.14; P =.58). In comparison, attending physicians examined 11 of 31 patients (35%) in contact isolation versus 79 of 108 patients (73%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.79; P <.001). DISCUSSION: Attending physicians are about half as likely to examine patients in contact isolation compared with patients not in contact isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608302     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-6553(02)48250-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  46 in total

1.  Effective cohorting and "superisolation" in a single intensive care unit in response to an outbreak of diverse multi-drug-resistant organisms.

Authors:  Laura H Rosenberger; Tjasa Hranjec; Amani D Politano; Brian R Swenson; Rosemarie Metzger; Hugo Bonatti; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.150

2.  Impact of contact isolation for multidrug-resistant organisms on the occurrence of medical errors and adverse events.

Authors:  J R Zahar; M Garrouste-Orgeas; A Vesin; C Schwebel; A Bonadona; F Philippart; C Ara-Somohano; B Misset; J F Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Dual-site sampling improved detection rates for MRSA colonization in patients with cutaneous abscesses.

Authors:  L May; C McCann; G Brooks; R Rothman; L Miller; J Jordan
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Patients' experience and perception of hospital-treated Clostridium difficile infections: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Isabelle Guillemin; Alexia Marrel; Jérémy Lambert; Axelle Beriot-Mathiot; Carole Doucet; Odysseas Kazoglou; Christine Luxemburger; Camille Reygrobellet; Benoit Arnould
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Hospital epidemiology and infection control in acute-care settings.

Authors:  Emily R M Sydnor; Trish M Perl
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Bedside Diagnosis in the Intensive Care Unit. Is Looking Overlooked?

Authors:  Thomas S Metkus; Bo Soo Kim
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-10

8.  Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in intensive care units.

Authors:  Theodore Kypraios; Philip D O'Neill; Susan S Huang; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Ben S Cooper
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Implementing the MRSA recommendations made by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) of 1999 - current considerations by the DGKH Management Board.

Authors:  Arne Simon; Martin Exner; Axel Kramer; Steffen Engelhart
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2009-04-09

10.  Elimination of Routine Contact Precautions for Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus: A Retrospective Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  Elise M Martin; Dana Russell; Zachary Rubin; Romney Humphries; Tristan R Grogan; David Elashoff; Daniel Z Uslan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.