Literature DB >> 25400303

Subject/object processing asymmetries in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from ERP data.

Nayoung Kwon1, Robert Kluender2, Marta Kutas3, Maria Polinsky4.   

Abstract

Subject relative (SR) clauses have a reliable processing advantage in VO languages like English in which relative clauses (RCs) follow the head noun. The question is whether this is also routinely true of OV languages like Japanese and Korean, in which RCs precede the head noun. We conducted an event-related brain potential (ERP) study of Korean RCs to test whether the SR advantage manifests in brain responses as well, and to tease apart the typological factors that might contribute to them. Our results suggest that brain responses to RCs are remarkably similar in VO and OV languages, but that ordering of the RC and its head noun localizes the response to different sentence positions. Our results also suggest that marking the right edge of the RC in Chinese (Yang et al. 2010) and Korean and the absence of it in Japanese (Ueno & Garnsey 2008) affect the response to the following head noun. The consistent SR advantage found in ERP studies lends further support to a universal subject preference in the processing of relative clauses.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25400303      PMCID: PMC4231604          DOI: 10.1353/lan.2013.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Language (Baltim)        ISSN: 0097-8507


  51 in total

1.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences.

Authors:  J Weckerly; M Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: an ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German.

Authors:  Claudia Felser; Harald Clahsen; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Determinants of bold signal correlates of processing object-extracted relative clauses.

Authors:  Evan Chen; W Caroline West; Gloria Waters; David Caplan
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading.

Authors:  J W King; M Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Sentence integration processes: an ERP study of Chinese sentence comprehension with relative clauses.

Authors:  Chin Lung Yang; Charles A Perfetti; Ying Liu
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  D Caplan; N Alpert; G Waters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.

Authors:  T F Münte; H J Heinze; M Matzke; B M Wieringa; S Johannes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Relations, objects, and the composition of analogies.

Authors:  Dedre Gentner; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-08

9.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.

Authors:  A Mecklinger; H Schriefers; K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

10.  The influence of memory load upon delay-interval activity in a working-memory task: an event-related functional MRI study.

Authors:  A P Jha; G McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  9 in total

1.  An ERP Study of Causative Cleft Construction in Japanese: Evidence for the Preference of Shorter Linear Distance in Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Masataka Yano; Tsutomu Sakamoto
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-04

2.  Disambiguation and Integration in Korean Relative Clause Processing.

Authors:  Michael Mansbridge; Sunju Park; Katsuo Tamaoka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-08

3.  Beyond input: Language learners produce novel relative clause types without exposure.

Authors:  Adam M Morgan; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-07-06

4.  Relative Clause Sentence Comprehension by Japanese-Speaking Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Miho Sasaki; Richard G Schwartz; Masaki Hisano; Makihiko Suzuki
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances.

Authors:  Rosa S Gisladottir; Dorothee J Chwilla; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Attraction Effects in Honorific Agreement in Korean.

Authors:  Nayoung Kwon; Patrick Sturt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-31

7.  Assessing Intervention Effects in Sentence Processing: Object Relatives vs. Subject Control.

Authors:  João Delgado; Ana Raposo; Ana Lúcia Santos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 8.  Heritage language and linguistic theory.

Authors:  Gregory Scontras; Zuzanna Fuchs; Maria Polinsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-09

9.  Time-Driven Effects on Processing Relative Clauses.

Authors:  Andrea Schremm; Merle Horne; Mikael Roll
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.