Macarius M Donneyong1, Carlton A Hornung2, Kira C Taylor2, Richard N Baumgartner2, John A Myers2, Charles B Eaton2, Eiran Z Gorodeski2, Liviu Klein2, Lisa W Martin2, James M Shikany2, Yiqing Song2, Wenjun Li2, JoAnn E Manson2. 1. From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (M.M.D.) and Department of Medicine (J.E.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, KY (M.M.D., C.A.H., K.C.T., R.N.B.); Department of Family Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI (C.B.E.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (E.Z.G.); Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco (L.K.); Heart and Vascular Institute, George Washington University, Washington DC (L.W.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham (J.M.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis (Y.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (W.L.). mdonneyong@partners.org. 2. From the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (M.M.D.) and Department of Medicine (J.E.M.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, KY (M.M.D., C.A.H., K.C.T., R.N.B.); Department of Family Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI (C.B.E.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (E.Z.G.); Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco (L.K.); Heart and Vascular Institute, George Washington University, Washington DC (L.W.M.); Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham (J.M.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis (Y.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (W.L.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D supplementation may be an inexpensive intervention to reduce heart failure (HF) incidence. However, there are insufficient data to support this hypothesis. This study evaluates whether vitamin D plus calcium (CaD) supplementation is associated with lower rates of HF in postmenopausal women and whether the effects differ between those at high versus low risk for HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analyses were restricted to 35 983 (of original 36 282) women aged 50 to 79 years old in the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial ofCaD supplementation who were randomized 1:1 in a double-blinded fashion to receive 1000 mg/d of calcium plus 400 IU/d of vitamin D3 or placebo. Overall, 744 adjudicated incident HF cases (intervention, 363; control, 381) occurred during a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 1.6) years. CaD supplementation, compared with placebo, was not associated with reduced HF risk in the overall population, hazard ratio, 0.95; P=0.46. However, CaD supplementation had differential effects (P interaction=0.005) in subgroups stratified by baseline risk status of HF defined by the presence (high risk=17 449) or absence (low risk=18 534) of pre-existing HF precursors including coronary heart diseases, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension: 37% (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.87]) lower risk of HF in the low-risk versus hazard ratio, 1.06; P=0.51, in the high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:CaD supplementation did not significantly reduce HF incidence in the overall cohort, however, it was beneficial among postmenopausal women without major HF precursors while of little value in high-risk subgroups. Additional studies are warranted to confirm these findings and investigate the underlying mechanism. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000611.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Vitamin D supplementation may be an inexpensive intervention to reduce heart failure (HF) incidence. However, there are insufficient data to support this hypothesis. This study evaluates whether vitamin D plus calcium (CaD) supplementation is associated with lower rates of HF in postmenopausal women and whether the effects differ between those at high versus low risk for HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analyses were restricted to 35 983 (of original 36 282) women aged 50 to 79 years old in the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial of CaD supplementation who were randomized 1:1 in a double-blinded fashion to receive 1000 mg/d of calcium plus 400 IU/d of vitamin D3 or placebo. Overall, 744 adjudicated incident HF cases (intervention, 363; control, 381) occurred during a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 1.6) years. CaD supplementation, compared with placebo, was not associated with reduced HF risk in the overall population, hazard ratio, 0.95; P=0.46. However, CaD supplementation had differential effects (P interaction=0.005) in subgroups stratified by baseline risk status of HF defined by the presence (high risk=17 449) or absence (low risk=18 534) of pre-existing HF precursors including coronary heart diseases, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension: 37% (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.87]) lower risk of HF in the low-risk versus hazard ratio, 1.06; P=0.51, in the high-risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:CaD supplementation did not significantly reduce HF incidence in the overall cohort, however, it was beneficial among postmenopausal women without major HF precursors while of little value in high-risk subgroups. Additional studies are warranted to confirm these findings and investigate the underlying mechanism. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000611.
Authors: Sharon Ann Hunt; William T Abraham; Marshall H Chin; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Mariell Jessup; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Keith Michl; John A Oates; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Goran Bjelakovic; Lise Lotte Gluud; Dimitrinka Nikolova; Kate Whitfield; Jørn Wetterslev; Rosa G Simonetti; Marija Bjelakovic; Christian Gluud Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-07-06
Authors: Anastassios G Pittas; Mei Chung; Thomas Trikalinos; Joanna Mitri; Michael Brendel; Kamal Patel; Alice H Lichtenstein; Joseph Lau; Ethan M Balk Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Carrie W Nemerovski; Michael P Dorsch; Robert U Simpson; Henry G Bone; Keith D Aaronson; Barry E Bleske Journal: Pharmacotherapy Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.705
Authors: John A Ford; Graeme S MacLennan; Alison Avenell; Mark Bolland; Andrew Grey; Miles Witham Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Chris Morgan; Andreas Kyvernitakis; Roy Cho; Orestis Pappas; Karthikeyan Ranganathan; Michael R Fischer; Venkatraman Srinivasan Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2018-04-05
Authors: Robert Scragg; Alistair W Stewart; Debbie Waayer; Carlene M M Lawes; Les Toop; John Sluyter; Judy Murphy; Kay-Tee Khaw; Carlos A Camargo Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676