Literature DB >> 21735411

Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults.

Goran Bjelakovic1, Lise Lotte Gluud, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Kate Whitfield, Jørn Wetterslev, Rosa G Simonetti, Marija Bjelakovic, Christian Gluud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The available evidence on vitamin D and mortality is inconclusive.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of vitamin D for prevention of mortality in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (to January 2011). We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and asked experts and pharmaceutical companies for additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials that compared vitamin D at any dose, duration, and route of administration versus placebo or no intervention. Vitamin D could have been administered as supplemental vitamin D (vitamin D(3) (cholecalciferol) or vitamin D(2) (ergocalciferol)) or an active form of vitamin D (1α-hydroxyvitamin D (alfacalcidol) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six authors extracted data independently. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratios (RR). To account for trials with zero events, meta-analyses of dichotomous data were repeated using risk differences (RD) and empirical continuity corrections. Risk of bias was considered in order to minimise risk of systematic errors. Trial sequential analyses were conducted to minimise the risk of random errors. MAIN
RESULTS: Fifty randomised trials with 94,148 participants provided data for the mortality analyses. Most trials included elderly women (older than 70 years). Vitamin D was administered for a median of two years. More than one half of the trials had a low risk of bias. Overall, vitamin D decreased mortality (RR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.00, I(2) = 0%). When the different forms of vitamin D were assessed separately, only vitamin D(3) decreased mortality significantly (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98, I(2) = 0%; 74,789 participants, 32 trials) whereas vitamin D(2), alfacalcidol, or calcitriol did not. Trial sequential analysis supported our finding regarding vitamin D(3), corresponding to 161 individuals treated to prevent one additional death. Vitamin D(3) combined with calcium increased the risk of nephrolithiasis (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34, I(2) = 0%). Alfacalcidol and calcitriol increased the risk of hypercalcaemia (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.17 to 8.68, I(2) = 17%). Data on health-related quality of life and health economics were inconclusive. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D in the form of vitamin D(3) seems to decrease mortality in predominantly elderly women who are mainly in institutions and dependent care. Vitamin D(2), alfacalcidol, and calcitriol had no statistically significant effect on mortality. Vitamin D(3) combined with calcium significantly increased nephrolithiasis. Both alfacalcidol and calcitriol significantly increased hypercalcaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735411     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007470.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  83 in total

1.  Risk of heart failure among postmenopausal women: a secondary analysis of the randomized trial of vitamin D plus calcium of the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Macarius M Donneyong; Carlton A Hornung; Kira C Taylor; Richard N Baumgartner; John A Myers; Charles B Eaton; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Liviu Klein; Lisa W Martin; James M Shikany; Yiqing Song; Wenjun Li; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Vitamin D deficiency exacerbates experimental stroke injury and dysregulates ischemia-induced inflammation in adult rats.

Authors:  Robyn Balden; Amutha Selvamani; Farida Sohrabji
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Can vitamin D deficiency break your heart?

Authors:  James H O'Keefe; Harshal R Patil; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Correspondence (letter to the editor): Appeal for vitamin D therapy.

Authors:  Stefan Pilz; Andreas Tomaschitz; Katharina Kienreich; Astrid Fahrleitner-Pammer; Winfried März
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Daily multivitamins to reduce mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.

Authors:  Mayank Singal; Hoan Linh Banh; G Michael Allan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  The short-term impact of vitamin D-based hip fracture prevention in older adults in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Chris D Poole; Jamie C Smith; J Stephen Davies
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Vitamin D status indicators in indigenous populations in East Africa.

Authors:  Martine F Luxwolda; Remko S Kuipers; Ido P Kema; E van der Veer; D A Janneke Dijck-Brouwer; Frits A J Muskiet
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 8.  The calcium and vitamin D controversy.

Authors:  Bo Abrahamsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 5.346

9.  Serum Vitamin D Level at ICU Admission and Mortality.

Authors:  Hakan Korkut Atalan; Bülent Güçyetmez
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 10.  The pathogenesis, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Leif Mosekilde; Peter Vestergaard; Lars Rejnmark
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.