Literature DB >> 25398862

Association of biodiversity with the rates of micropollutant biotransformations among full-scale wastewater treatment plant communities.

David R Johnson1, Damian E Helbling2, Tae Kwon Lee3, Joonhong Park3, Kathrin Fenner4, Hans-Peter E Kohler5, Martin Ackermann6.   

Abstract

Biodiversities can differ substantially among different wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) communities. Whether differences in biodiversity translate into differences in the provision of particular ecosystem services, however, is under active debate. Theoretical considerations predict that WWTP communities with more biodiversity are more likely to contain strains that have positive effects on the rates of particular ecosystem functions, thus resulting in positive associations between those two variables. However, if WWTP communities were sufficiently biodiverse to nearly saturate the set of possible positive effects, then positive associations would not occur between biodiversity and the rates of particular ecosystem functions. To test these expectations, we measured the taxonomic biodiversity, functional biodiversity, and rates of 10 different micropollutant biotransformations for 10 full-scale WWTP communities. We have demonstrated that biodiversity is positively associated with the rates of specific, but not all, micropollutant biotransformations. Thus, one cannot assume whether or how biodiversity will associate with the rate of any particular micropollutant biotransformation. We have further demonstrated that the strongest positive association is between biodiversity and the collective rate of multiple micropollutant biotransformations. Thus, more biodiversity is likely required to maximize the collective rates of multiple micropollutant biotransformations than is required to maximize the rate of any individual micropollutant biotransformation. We finally provide evidence that the positive associations are stronger for rare micropollutant biotransformations than for common micropollutant biotransformations. Together, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that differences in biodiversity can indeed translate into differences in the provision of particular ecosystem services by full-scale WWTP communities.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398862      PMCID: PMC4277575          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03286-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  33 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  M Loreau; S Naeem; P Inchausti; J Bengtsson; J P Grime; A Hector; D U Hooper; M A Huston; D Raffaelli; B Schmid; D Tilman; D A Wardle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Combined niche and neutral effects in a microbial wastewater treatment community.

Authors:  Irina Dana Ofiteru; Mary Lunn; Thomas P Curtis; George F Wells; Craig S Criddle; Christopher A Francis; William T Sloan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in effluent matrices: A survey of transformation and removal during wastewater treatment and implications for wastewater management.

Authors:  Rebekah L Oulton; Tamar Kohn; David M Cwiertny
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2010-10-12

4.  The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services.

Authors:  Thomas Bell; Jonathan A Newman; Bernard W Silverman; Sarah L Turner; Andrew K Lilley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Maintenance of soil functioning following erosion of microbial diversity.

Authors:  Sophie Wertz; Valérie Degrange; James I Prosser; Franck Poly; Claire Commeaux; Thomas Freitag; Nadine Guillaumaud; Xavier Le Roux
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity.

Authors:  Erika S Zavaleta; Jae R Pasari; Kristin B Hulvey; G David Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in 14 wastewater treatment systems in China.

Authors:  Xiaohui Wang; Man Hu; Yu Xia; Xianghua Wen; Kun Ding
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability.

Authors:  A Chao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Impact of microbial diversity depletion on xenobiotic degradation by sewage-activated sludge.

Authors:  Guillermina Hernandez-Raquet; Elodie Durand; Florence Braun; Cristiana Cravo-Laureau; Jean-Jacques Godon
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.541

View more
  7 in total

1.  Defining the functional traits that drive bacterial decomposer community productivity.

Authors:  Rachael Evans; Anna M Alessi; Susannah Bird; Simon J McQueen-Mason; Neil C Bruce; Michael A Brockhurst
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Bacterial Diversity Controls Transformation of Wastewater-Derived Organic Contaminants in River-Simulating Flumes.

Authors:  Malte Posselt; Jonas Mechelke; Cyrus Rutere; Claudia Coll; Anna Jaeger; Muhammad Raza; Karin Meinikmann; Stefan Krause; Anna Sobek; Jörg Lewandowski; Marcus A Horn; Juliane Hollender; Jonathan P Benskin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Can meta-omics help to establish causality between contaminant biotransformations and genes or gene products?

Authors:  David R Johnson; Damian E Helbling; Yujie Men; Kathrin Fenner
Journal:  Environ Sci (Camb)       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.251

Review 4.  Challenges in microbial ecology: building predictive understanding of community function and dynamics.

Authors:  Stefanie Widder; Rosalind J Allen; Thomas Pfeiffer; Thomas P Curtis; Carsten Wiuf; William T Sloan; Otto X Cordero; Sam P Brown; Babak Momeni; Wenying Shou; Helen Kettle; Harry J Flint; Andreas F Haas; Béatrice Laroche; Jan-Ulrich Kreft; Paul B Rainey; Shiri Freilich; Stefan Schuster; Kim Milferstedt; Jan R van der Meer; Tobias Groβkopf; Jef Huisman; Andrew Free; Cristian Picioreanu; Christopher Quince; Isaac Klapper; Simon Labarthe; Barth F Smets; Harris Wang; Orkun S Soyer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Elucidating the impact of microbial community biodiversity on pharmaceutical biotransformation during wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Lauren B Stadler; Jeseth Delgado Vela; Sunit Jain; Gregory J Dick; Nancy G Love
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Association between Aquatic Micropollutant Dissipation and River Sediment Bacterial Communities.

Authors:  Claudia Coll; Raven Bier; Zhe Li; Silke Langenheder; Elena Gorokhova; Anna Sobek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Stream microbial communities and ecosystem functioning show complex responses to multiple stressors in wastewater.

Authors:  Francis J Burdon; Yaohui Bai; Marta Reyes; Manu Tamminen; Philipp Staudacher; Simon Mangold; Heinz Singer; Katja Räsänen; Adriano Joss; Scott D Tiegs; Jukka Jokela; Rik I L Eggen; Christian Stamm
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 13.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.