| Literature DB >> 29076630 |
Lauren B Stadler1, Jeseth Delgado Vela1, Sunit Jain2, Gregory J Dick2, Nancy G Love1.
Abstract
In addition to removing organics and other nutrients, the microorganisms in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) biotransform many pharmaceuticals present in wastewater. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between pharmaceutical biotransformation and biodiversity in WWTP bioreactor microbial communities and identify taxa and functional genes that were strongly associated with biotransformation. Dilution-to-extinction of an activated sludge microbial community was performed to establish cultures with a gradient of microbial biodiversity. Batch experiments were performed using the dilution cultures to determine biotransformation extents of several environmentally relevant pharmaceuticals. With this approach, because the communities were all established from the same original community, and using sequencing of the 16S rRNA and metatranscriptome, we identified candidate taxa and genes whose activity and transcript abundances associated with the extent of individual pharmaceutical biotransformation and were lost across the biodiversity gradient. Metabolic genes such as dehydrogenases, amidases and monooxygenases were significantly associated with pharmaceutical biotransformation, and five genera were identified whose activity significantly associated with pharmaceutical biotransformation. Understanding how biotransformation relates to biodiversity will inform the design of biological WWTPs for enhanced removal of chemicals that negatively impact environmental health.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29076630 PMCID: PMC6196385 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12870
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Figure 1Rarefaction plots for the dilution cultures based on 16S rRNA gene and 16S rRNA sequencing (taxonomic) and metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing (functional). Dilution conditions are shown in black (10−2), dark grey, dotted (10−4) and light grey, dashed (10−7).
Biodiversity indices based on 16S rRNA gene, 16S rRNA, metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing of biomass from the dilution cultures. The same letter indicates treatments without significant differences based on pairwise comparisons (t‐test, Bonferroni‐adjusted two‐sided P > 0.05). Reported values are averages and standard deviations of triplicate batches
| Biodiversity index | Dilution condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10−2 | 10−4 | 10−7 | |
| DNA | |||
| Taxonomic richness (unique OTUs) | 311 ± 63.0A | 123 ± 6.66B | 51.0 ± 20.8C |
| Chao1 extrapolated taxonomic richness | 358 ± 67.8A | 136 ± 3.75B | 64.1 ± 23.4C |
| Shannon taxonomic diversity | 2.67 ± 0.189A | 2.02 ± 0.0619B | 1.37 ± 0.0594C |
| Pielou taxonomic evenness | 1.05 ± 0.0547A | 0.944 ± 0.0239A,B | 0.773 ± 0.0902B |
| Functional richness (unique functional genes) | 4600 ± 45.0A | 4560 ± 27.0A | 4130 ± 221A |
| Chao1 extrapolated functional richness | 4760 ± 12.9A | 4720 ± 46.9A | 4240 ± 181B |
| Shannon functional diversity | 7.64 ± 0.0103A | 7.60 ± 0.00258B | 7.55 ± 0.00905C |
| Pielou functional evenness | 2.08 ± 0.00332A | 2.07 ± 0.00308A | 2.08 ± 0.00823A |
| RNA | |||
| Taxonomic richness (unique OTUs) | 512 ± 9.54A | 190 ± 21.7B | 109 ± 35.9B |
| Chao1 extrapolated taxonomic richness | 983 ± 61.9A | 354 ± 31.7B | 208 ± 84.4B |
| Shannon taxonomic diversity | 2.71 ± 0.0407A | 1.95 ± 0.0406B | 1.62 ± 0.122C |
| Pielou taxonomic evenness | 0.906 ± 0.0211A | 0.767 ± 0.00654B | 0.710 ± 0.102A,B |
| Functional richness (unique functional genes) | 3930 ± 20.3A | 3820 ± 20.1B | 3420 ± 106C |
| Chao1 extrapolated functional richness | 4220 ± 24.1A | 4140 ± 53.6A | 3650 ± 115B |
| Shannon functional diversity | 6.51 ± 0.0590A | 6.56 ± 0.120A | 6.53 ± 0.0369A |
| Pielou functional evenness | 1.80 ± 0.0175A | 1.82 ± 0.0310A | 1.83 ± 0.00627A |
Figure 2Average pharmaceutical loss (disappearance of the parent compound, n = 3) normalized to volatile suspended solids concentration for each dilution condition (black: 10−2; dark grey hatch: 10−4; light grey: 10−7). The asterisk (*) by the compound name indicates a significant difference among the group means (ANOVA, P < 0.05). The same letters above the bars indicate treatments without significant differences between biotransformation extent (t‐test, Bonferroni‐adjusted two‐sided P > 0.05). Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate batches.
Figure 3Relationship between richness and pharmaceutical biotransformation extent. Left (A) represents the functional richness, and right (B) represents taxonomic richness. Each diamond or circle represents a different pharmaceutical compound. Open diamonds and circles represent DNA‐based richness and filled diamonds, and circles represent RNA‐based richness. The 10−7 dilution condition (least diverse) is represented in light grey, the 10−4 condition is in grey, and the 10−2 condition (most diverse) is in black. The average transformation extents across all compounds are shown with a black line (DNA‐based richness) and a cross (RNA‐based richness). Reported P‐values and ρ (rho) values (Spearman rank correlation coefficients) are based on a two‐sided Spearman rank correlation test.
Phylogenetic assignments of OTUs with relative activities that significantly associated with pharmaceutical biotransformation extents
| Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Compound(s) | Literature supporting role in biotransformation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Atenolol, venlafaxine, collective | (Pérez‐Pantoja |
|
|
|
|
|
| Atenolol, collective | (Amorim |
|
|
|
|
|
| Atenolol, venlafaxine | (Martínková and Křen, |
|
|
|
|
|
| Atenolol, venlafaxine | (Helbling |
|
|
|
|
|
| Atenolol, venlafaxine, collective | (Crawford and Mohn, |