Thomas O Clanton1,2, Charles P Ho3,4, Brady T Williams1, Rachel K Surowiec1, Coley C Gatlin1,2, C Thomas Haytmanek1,2, Robert F LaPrade1,2. 1. Departments of BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 W. Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA. 2. The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA. 3. Departments of BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Research, Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 W. Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA. charles.ho@sprivail.org. 4. The Steadman Clinic, Vail, CO, USA. charles.ho@sprivail.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Historically, syndesmosis injuries have been underdiagnosed. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 3.0-T MRI presentations of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and its individual structures in both asymptomatic and injured cohorts. METHODS: Ten age-matched asymptomatic volunteers were imaged to characterize the asymptomatic syndesmotic anatomy. A series of 21 consecutive patients with a pre-operative 3.0-T ankle MRI and subsequent arthroscopic evaluation for suspected syndesmotic injury were reviewed and analysed. Prospectively collected pre-operative MRI findings were correlated with arthroscopy to assess diagnostic accuracy [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)]. RESULTS: Pathology diagnosed on pre-operative MRI correlated strongly with arthroscopic findings. Syndesmotic ligament disruption was prospectively diagnosed on MRI with excellent sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy: anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (87.5, 100, 100, 71.4, 90.5 %); posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (N/A, 95.2, 0.0, 100, 95.2 %); and interosseous tibiofibular ligament (66.7, 86.7, 66.7, 86.7, 81.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative 3.0-T MRI demonstrated excellent accuracy in the diagnosis of syndesmotic ligament tears and allowed for the visualization of relevant individual syndesmosis structures. Using a standard clinical ankle MRI protocol at 3.0-T, associated ligament injuries could be readily identified. Clinical implementation of optimal high-field MRI sequences in a standard clinical ankle MRI exam can aid in the diagnosis of syndesmotic injuries, augment pre-operative planning, and facilitate anatomic repair by providing additional details regarding the integrity of individual syndesmotic structures not discernible through physical examination and radiographic assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE: Historically, syndesmosis injuries have been underdiagnosed. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 3.0-T MRI presentations of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and its individual structures in both asymptomatic and injured cohorts. METHODS: Ten age-matched asymptomatic volunteers were imaged to characterize the asymptomatic syndesmotic anatomy. A series of 21 consecutive patients with a pre-operative 3.0-T ankle MRI and subsequent arthroscopic evaluation for suspected syndesmotic injury were reviewed and analysed. Prospectively collected pre-operative MRI findings were correlated with arthroscopy to assess diagnostic accuracy [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)]. RESULTS: Pathology diagnosed on pre-operative MRI correlated strongly with arthroscopic findings. Syndesmotic ligament disruption was prospectively diagnosed on MRI with excellent sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy: anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (87.5, 100, 100, 71.4, 90.5 %); posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (N/A, 95.2, 0.0, 100, 95.2 %); and interosseous tibiofibular ligament (66.7, 86.7, 66.7, 86.7, 81.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative 3.0-T MRI demonstrated excellent accuracy in the diagnosis of syndesmotic ligament tears and allowed for the visualization of relevant individual syndesmosis structures. Using a standard clinical ankle MRI protocol at 3.0-T, associated ligament injuries could be readily identified. Clinical implementation of optimal high-field MRI sequences in a standard clinical ankle MRI exam can aid in the diagnosis of syndesmotic injuries, augment pre-operative planning, and facilitate anatomic repair by providing additional details regarding the integrity of individual syndesmotic structures not discernible through physical examination and radiographic assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: James Francis Griffith; Domily Ting Yi Lau; David Ka Wai Yeung; Margaret Wan Nar Wong Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: J J Hermans; N Wentink; A Beumer; W C J Hop; M P Heijboer; A F C M Moonen; A Z Ginai Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Lars Gerhard Großterlinden; Maximilian Hartel; Jin Yamamura; Bjoern Schoennagel; Nils Bürger; Mathias Krause; Alexander Spiro; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Johannes Maria Rueger; Martin Rupprecht Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Bart Lubberts; Daniel Guss; Bryan G Vopat; Anne H Johnson; C Niek van Dijk; Hang Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Paul F Förschner; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Buchmann; Georg Feuerriegel; Felix Hofmann; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Pia Jungmann; Jonas Pogorzelski Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2017-04-27
Authors: Kevin Staats; Manuel Sabeti-Aschraf; Sebastian Apprich; Hannes Platzgummer; Stephan E Puchner; Johannes Holinka; Reinhard Windhager; Reinhard Schuh Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-05-15 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Nico Ng; James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Julian Tam Maingard; David Ng; Gaurav Gupta; Dee Nandurkar; Sina Babazadeh; Harvinder Bedi Journal: J Med Radiat Sci Date: 2022-05-03