Literature DB >> 25394400

Benchmarking coupled cluster methods on singlet excited states of nucleobases.

Dániel Kánnár1, Péter G Szalay.   

Abstract

In this paper, coupled cluster methods CC2, CCSD, CCSDR(3) and EOM-CCSD(T) have been benchmarked against CC3 for the transition energies of nucleobases. Beside presenting vertical excitation energies for about 30 singlet transitions of four molecules, the results are analyzed statistically and problematic cases have been discussed in detail. It is concluded that the mean deviation of the CC2 results is smaller than that of the CCSD. However, the latter seems to be more systematic, i.e. it usually overestimates excitation energies by about 0.2 eV but with somewhat smaller standard deviation. Unfortunately, with decreasing single excitation contribution in the wave function CCSD gives large error, which can not be corrected by the non-iterative triples methods CCSDR(3) and EOM-CCSD(T).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25394400     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2503-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  14 in total

1.  Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States.

Authors:  Dániel Kánnár; Péter G Szalay
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Calculation of excited-state properties using general coupled-cluster and configuration-interaction models.

Authors:  Mihály Kállay; Jürgen Gauss
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Single-reference ab initio methods for the calculation of excited states of large molecules.

Authors:  Andreas Dreuw; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Charge-transfer excited states in a pi-stacked adenine dimer, as predicted using long-range-corrected time-dependent density functional theory.

Authors:  Adrian W Lange; Mary A Rohrdanz; John M Herbert
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Critical appraisal of excited state nonadiabatic dynamics simulations of 9H-adenine.

Authors:  Mario Barbatti; Zhenggang Lan; Rachel Crespo-Otero; Jaroslaw J Szymczak; Hans Lischka; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Benchmarking for perturbative triple-excitations in EE-EOM-CC methods.

Authors:  Thomas J Watson; Victor F Lotrich; Peter G Szalay; Ajith Perera; Rodney J Bartlett
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Details of the excited-state potential energy surfaces of adenine by coupled cluster techniques.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Benda; Péter G Szalay
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Benchmark studies on the building blocks of DNA. 2. Effect of biological environment on the electronic excitation spectrum of nucleobases.

Authors:  Péter G Szalay; Thomas Watson; Ajith Perera; Victor Lotrich; Géza Fogarasi; Rodney J Bartlett
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Benchmark studies on the building blocks of DNA. 3. Watson-Crick and stacked base pairs.

Authors:  Péter G Szalay; Thomas Watson; Ajith Perera; Victor Lotrich; Rodney J Bartlett
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3.

Authors:  Marko Schreiber; Mario R Silva-Junior; Stephan P A Sauer; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Ultrafast Quantum Dynamics of Photoexcited Adenine-Thymine Basepair Investigated with a Fragment-based Diabatization and a Linear Vibronic Coupling Model.

Authors:  Martha Yaghoubi Jouybari; James A Green; Roberto Improta; Fabrizio Santoro
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.944

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.