| Literature DB >> 25393291 |
Miroslava Petrovova1, Jan Tkadlec2, Lukas Dvoracek1, Eliska Streitova2, Irena Licha1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the strategies for survival stress conditions in bacteria is a regulatory adaptive system called general stress response (GSR), which is dependent on the SigB transcription factor in Bacillus sp. The GSR is one of the largest regulon in Bacillus sp., including about 100 genes; however, most of the genes that show changes in expression during various stresses have not yet been characterized or assigned a biochemical function for the encoded proteins. Previously, we characterized the Bacillus subtilis168 osmosensitive mutant, defective in the yxkO gene (encoding a putative ribokinase), which was recently assigned in vitro as an ADP/ATP-dependent NAD(P)H-hydrate dehydratase and was demonstrated to belong to the SigB operon. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25393291 PMCID: PMC4231035 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Bacillus subtilis strains, phage, and plasmids used in this study.
| Name or code | Relevant genotype or description | Reference, Source, or construction |
|
| ||
| B.s. 168 (WT) |
| BGSC (1A1) |
| B.s. SG4 (WT) |
| BGSC (1A680) |
| L-42 |
|
|
| LD1 |
| this study |
| MP2 | Mutin4:: | this study |
| WT/P | (P | this study |
| MP2/P | Mutin4:: | this study |
|
| Bacillusphage PBS1 | BGSC (1P1) |
|
| ||
| pDG1661 |
| BGSC (ECE112) |
| pMUTIN |
| BGSC (ECE139) |
| pJT2 | pDG1661 with | this study |
| pMP2 | pMUTIN with 5′ end segment of | this study |
MALDI-TOF peptide mapping identification.
| Protein | Protein Accession | MascoteScore | Best Protein Description |
|
| |||
| Pgk | gi|16080446 | 104 | phosphoglycerate kinase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| CitC | gi|16079965 | 885 | isocitrate dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Mdh | gi|16079964 | 105 | malate dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Mdh deg | gi|16079964 | 150 | malate dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| AtpD iso1 | gi|16080734 | 93 | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| AtpD iso 2 | gi|16080734 | 215 | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| AtpD iso 3 | gi|16080734 | 335 | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| FrlB | gi|16080314 | 97 | hypothetical protein BSU32610 [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Hag iso1 | gi|16080589 | 83 | flagellin [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Hag iso2 | gi|16080589 | 78 | flagellin [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Hag iso 3 | gi|16080589 | 83 | flagellin [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| GroEL | gi|16077670 | 74 | chaperonin GroEL [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| GlnA | gi|16078809 | 123 | glutamine synthetase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
|
| |||
| Pgk | gi|16080446 | 329 | phosphoglycerate kinase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| CitC | gi|16079965 | 118 | isocitrate dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Mdh | gi|16079964 | 129 | malate dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Mdh deg | gi|16079964 | 209 | malate dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Atp iso1 | gi|16080734 | 125 | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Atp iso 2 | gi|16080734 | 155 | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168 |
| AtpD iso 3 | gi|16080734 | 341 | F0F1 ATP synthase subunit beta [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168 |
| FrlB | gi|16080314 | 119 | fructoselysine-6-P-deglycase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Hag iso1 | gi|16080589 | 157 | flagellin [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Hag iso2 | gi|16080589 | 175 | flagellin [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Hag iso 3 | gi|16080589 | 89 | flagellin [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| GroEL | gi|16077670 | 140 | chaperonin GroEL [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Ilvc iso1 | gi|16079881 | 194 | ketol-acid reductoisomerase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Ilvc iso2 | gi|16079881 | 183 | ketol-acid reductoisomerase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Asd | gi|16078738 | 81 | aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
| Ald | gi|16080244 | 79 | L-alanine dehydrogenase [Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis str. 168] |
Detailed data from MALDI-TOF peptide mapping identification of proteins, that differed in levels when exposed to osmotic and ethanol stress.
Figure 1Growth characterization of WT, LD1, and MP2 mutants of Bacillus subtilis in long-term cultivation and in response to stress.
For long-term growth measurements, the cells were grown in LB medium (A). Effect of MM medium and K+ limitation (0.5 mM K+) to growth rate of mutant (LD1) (B). Osmotic stress performed only for MP2 mutant in MM medium and K+ limitation is demonstrated (C). Effect of ethanol stress was measured in MM medium and K+ limitation for both mutants (LD1, MP2) (D). (WT - Bacillus subtilis 168 or SG4, LD1 and MP2– yxkO knock-out mutants, for details see Table 1). Exposure of stress is marked by arrows. Measurements were done with cells synchronized in exponential growth, and stress conditions were set up as is described in . The typical growth rate curve is shown from measurements made in triplicate for each condition.
Figure 2Transcription level of Pctc on genetic background of WT and MP2 mutant.
Pctc activation measurements of WT and MP2 were performed under ethanol stress in LB medium (A), osmotic stress in MM medium with 10 mM K+ concentration (B), osmotic stress in MM medium with 0.5 mM K+ concentration (C), shift from MM medium with 10 mM K+ concentration to MM medium with 0.5 mM K+ concentration (D). Time 0 indicates application of stress. Details of transcription activity measurements, growth, and stress conditions are described in
Figure 3Comparative 2DE analysis of WT versus MP2 mutant exposed to osmotic and ethanol stress – metabolic enzymes.
Proteins with protein level profiles that are similar for both stresses. For experimental conditions and data evaluation, see . Separate columns of the bar charts show the protein level of respective proteins, as calculated from the quantification of the spot volume by PDQuest 8.0 software; y-axes are scaled in intensity for each particular protein. Bars represent each strains and conditions, and there are in the same order as the protein level profiles are presented.
Figure 6Comparative 2DE analysis of WT versus MP2 mutant exposed to ethanol stress.
Proteins with protein level profiles that are unique for ethanol stress. For experimental conditions and data evaluation, see . The picture description is same as for Figure 3.
Figure 4Comparative 2DE analysis of WT versus MP2 mutant exposed to osmotic and ethanol stress – stress adaptation and motility.
Proteins with protein level profiles that are similar for both stresses. For experimental conditions and data evaluation, see . The picture description is same as for Figure 3.
Figure 5Comparative 2DE analysis of WT versus MP2 mutant exposed to osmotic stress.
Proteins with protein level profiles that are unique for osmotic stress. For experimental conditions and data evaluation, see . The picture description is same as for Figure 3.