Literature DB >> 25392052

Long-range electron transfer triggers mechanistic differences between iron(IV)-oxo and iron(IV)-imido oxidants.

Suresh Kumar1, Abayomi S Faponle, Prasenjit Barman, Anil Kumar Vardhaman, Chivukula V Sastri, Devesh Kumar, Sam P de Visser.   

Abstract

Nature often utilizes molecular oxygen for oxidation reactions through monoxygenases and dioxygenases. In many of these systems, a high-valent iron(IV)-oxo active species is found. In recent years, evidence has accumulated of possible iron(IV)-imido and iron(V)-nitrido intermediates in enzymatic catalysis, although little is known about their activity. In this work, we report a detailed combined kinetics and computational study on the difference in reactivity and chemical properties of nonheme iron(IV)-oxo compared with iron(IV)-tosylimido. We show here that iron(IV)-tosylimido complex is much more reactive with sulfides than the corresponding iron(IV)-oxo complex; however, the reverse trend is obtained for hydrogen atom abstraction reactions. The latter proceed with a relatively small kinetic isotope effect of kH/kD = 7 for the iron(IV)-tosylimido complex. Moreover, a Hammett analysis of hydrogen atom abstraction from para-X-benzyl alcohol reveals a slope of close to zero for the iron(IV)-oxo, whereas a strong negative slope is found for the iron(IV)-tosylimido complex. These studies implicate dramatic changes in the reaction mechanisms and suggest a considerable charge transfer in the transition states. Density functional theory calculations were performed to support the experiments and confirm an initial long-range electron transfer for the iron(IV)-tosylimido complex with substrates, due to a substantially larger electron affinity compared with the iron(IV)-oxo species. As a consequence, it also reacts more efficiently in electrophilic addition reactions such as those with sulfides. By contrast, the long-range electron transfer for the iron(IV)-tosylimido complex results in a rate constant that is dependent on the π*xz → σ*z(2) excitation energy, which raises the hydrogen atom abstraction barrier above that found for the iron(IV)-oxo. On the other hand, sulfimidation has much earlier electron transfer steps with respect to sulfoxidation. All data has been analyzed and rationalized with valence bond models and thermochemical cycles. Our studies highlight the catalytic potential of iron(IV)-tosylimido complexes in chemistry and biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25392052     DOI: 10.1021/ja508403w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  19 in total

1.  Properties and reactivity of μ-nitrido-bridged dimetal porphyrinoid complexes: how does ruthenium compare to iron?

Authors:  M Qadri E Mubarak; Alexander B Sorokin; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.358

2.  A Mononuclear Nonheme Iron(V)-Imido Complex.

Authors:  Seungwoo Hong; Kyle D Sutherlin; Anil Kumar Vardhaman; James J Yan; Sora Park; Yong-Min Lee; Soojeong Jang; Xiaoyan Lu; Takehiro Ohta; Takashi Ogura; Edward I Solomon; Wonwoo Nam
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Hydrogen Atom Abstraction by High-Valent Fe(OH) versus Mn(OH) Porphyrinoid Complexes: Mechanistic Insights from Experimental and Computational Studies.

Authors:  Jan Paulo T Zaragoza; Daniel C Cummins; M Qadri E Mubarak; Maxime A Siegler; Sam P de Visser; David P Goldberg
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  DFT analysis of the electronic structure of Fe(IV) species active in nitrene transfer catalysis: influence of the coordination sphere.

Authors:  Ranjan Patra; Pascale Maldivi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Arene activation by a nonheme iron(III)-hydroperoxo complex: pathways leading to phenol and ketone products.

Authors:  Abayomi S Faponle; Frédéric Banse; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  Singlet versus Triplet Reactivity in an Mn(V)-Oxo Species: Testing Theoretical Predictions Against Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Tzuhsiung Yang; Matthew G Quesne; Heather M Neu; Fabián G Cantú Reinhard; David P Goldberg; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Achieving One-Electron Oxidation of a Mononuclear Nonheme Iron(V)-Imido Complex.

Authors:  Seungwoo Hong; Xiaoyan Lu; Yong-Min Lee; Mi Sook Seo; Takehiro Ohta; Takashi Ogura; Martin Clémancey; Pascale Maldivi; Jean-Marc Latour; Ritimukta Sarangi; Wonwoo Nam
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Alkyl Chain Growth on a Transition Metal Center: How Does Iron Compare to Ruthenium and Osmium?

Authors:  Mala A Sainna; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Challenging Density Functional Theory Calculations with Hemes and Porphyrins.

Authors:  Sam P de Visser; Martin J Stillman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  An iron-oxygen intermediate formed during the catalytic cycle of cysteine dioxygenase.

Authors:  E P Tchesnokov; A S Faponle; C G Davies; M G Quesne; R Turner; M Fellner; R J Souness; S M Wilbanks; S P de Visser; G N L Jameson
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.