Literature DB >> 19154375

Heterozygosity-fitness correlations revealed by neutral and candidate gene markers in roe deer from a long-term study.

Anne Da Silva1, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Nigel G Yoccoz, A J Mark Hewison, Max Galan, Tim Coulson, Dominique Allainé, Laurence Vial, Daniel Delorme, Guy Van Laere, François Klein, Gordon Luikart.   

Abstract

Heterozygosity-fitness correlations (HFCs) are increasingly reported but the underlying mechanisms causing HFCs are generally poorly understood. Here, we test for HFCs in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) using 22 neutral microsatellites widely distributed in the genome and four microsatellites in genes that are potentially under selection. Juvenile survival was used as a proxy for individual fitness in a population that has been intensively studied for 30 years in northeastern France. For 222 juveniles, we computed two measures of genetic diversity: individual heterozygosity (H), and mean d(2) (relatedness of parental genomes). We found a relationship between genetic diversity and fitness both for the 22 neutral markers and two candidate genes: IGF1 (Insulin-like Growth Factor I) and NRAMP (natural resistance-associated macrophage protein). Statistical evidence and the size of genetic effects on juvenile survival were comparable to those reported for early development and cohort variation, suggesting a substantial influence of genetic components on fitness in this roe deer population. For the 22 neutral microsatellites, a correlation with fitness was revealed for mean d(2), but not for H, suggesting a possible outbreeding advantage. This heterosis effect could have been favored by introduction of genetically distant (Hungarian) roe deer to the population in recent times and, possibly, by the structuring of the population into distinct clans. The locus-specific correlations with fitness may be driven by growth rate advantages and resistance to diseases known to exist in the studied population. Our analyses of neutral and candidate gene markers both suggest that the observed HFCs are likely mainly due to linkage with dominant or overdominant loci that affect fitness ("local" effect) rather than to a genome-wide relationship with homozygosity due to inbreeding ("general" effect).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19154375     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00542.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Genetic diversity at neutral and adaptive loci determines individual fitness in a long-lived territorial bird.

Authors:  Rosa Agudo; Martina Carrete; Miguel Alcaide; Ciro Rico; Fernando Hiraldo; José Antonio Donázar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Reduced microsatellite heterozygosity does not affect natal dispersal in three contrasting roe deer populations.

Authors:  Cécile Vanpé; Lucie Debeffe; A J Mark Hewison; Erwan Quéméré; Jean-François Lemaître; Maxime Galan; Britany Amblard; François Klein; Bruno Cargnelutti; Gilles Capron; Joël Merlet; Claude Warnant; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A one night stand? Reproductive excursions of female roe deer as a breeding dispersal tactic.

Authors:  Lucie Debeffe; Stefano Focardi; Christophe Bonenfant; A J Mark Hewison; Nicolas Morellet; Cécile Vanpé; Marco Heurich; Petter Kjellander; John D C Linnell; Atle Mysterud; Maryline Pellerin; Pavel Sustr; Ferdinando Urbano; Francesca Cagnacci
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The mixed mating system of the sea palm kelp Postelsia palmaeformis: few costs to selfing.

Authors:  Allison K Barner; Catherine A Pfister; J Timothy Wootton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Local effects drive heterozygosity-fitness correlations in an outcrossing long-lived tree.

Authors:  Isabel Rodríguez-Quilón; Luis Santos-del-Blanco; Delphine Grivet; Juan Pablo Jaramillo-Correa; Juan Majada; Giovanni G Vendramin; Ricardo Alía; Santiago C González-Martínez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  No difference between the sexes in fine-scale spatial genetic structure of roe deer.

Authors:  Nadège Bonnot; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Aurélie Coulon; Maxime Galan; Jean-François Cosson; Daniel Delorme; François Klein; A J Mark Hewison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The population growth consequences of variation in individual heterozygosity.

Authors:  Martina M I Di Fonzo; Fanie Pelletier; T H Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton; Tim Coulson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exploring heterozygosity-survival correlations in a wild songbird population: contrasting effects between juvenile and adult stages.

Authors:  David Canal; David Serrano; Jaime Potti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does genetic diversity predict health in humans?

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Host Genetic Diversity and Infectious Diseases. Focus on Wild Boar, Red Deer and Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Javier Pérez-González; Juan Carranza; Remigio Martínez; José Manuel Benítez-Medina
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.