| Literature DB >> 25388455 |
Nicolas Spegazzini1, Ishan Barman2, Narahara Chari Dingari3, Rishikesh Pandey3, Jaqueline S Soares4, Yukihiro Ozaki5, Ramachandra Rao Dasari3.
Abstract
Vibrational spectroscopy has emerged as a promising tool for non-invasive, multiplexed measurement of blood constituents - an outstanding problem in biophotonics. Here, we propose a novel analytical framework that enables spectroscopy-based longitudinal tracking of chemical concentration without necessitating extensive a priori concentration information. The principal idea is to employ a concentration space transformation acquired from the spectral information, where these estimates are used together with the concentration profiles generated from the system kinetic model. Using blood glucose monitoring by Raman spectroscopy as an illustrative example, we demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach as compared to conventional calibration methods. Specifically, our approach exhibits a 35% reduction in error over partial least squares regression when applied to a dataset acquired from human subjects undergoing glucose tolerance tests. This method offers a new route at screening gestational diabetes and opens doors for continuous process monitoring without sample perturbation at intermediate time points.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25388455 PMCID: PMC4894421 DOI: 10.1038/srep07013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A schematic illustration of the Raman spectroscopic measurement process for in vivo continuous glucose monitoring.
Figure 2Representative Raman spectra acquired from a human subject undergoing OGTT.
The thick line shows the mean value and the shaded area represent ±1 standard deviation.
Figure 3Plot of prospective prediction (iCONIC, red diamond), LOOCV (PLS, black square) and reference glucose concentrations (blue squares) for a representative human subject.
Figure 4Blood glucose predictions of the iCONIC model for the complete human subject dataset shown on the Clarke Error Grid.
Summary of PLS LOOCV and iCONIC prediction results for the human subject dataset
| Conventional PLS Model | ICONIC Model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | No. of Data Points | RMSECV (mM) | RMSEP (mM) | k1 | k2 | λ | Change in error (%) |
| 1 | 25 | 1.17 | 0.0200 | 0.0192 | 0.89 | 42.15 | |
| 2 | 26 | 0.72 | 0.0185 | 0.0178 | 0.77 | 20.39 | |
| 3 | 26 | 1.28 | 0.0157 | 0.0151 | 0.67 | 58.87 | |
| 4 | 20 | 0.76 | 0.0245 | 0.0240 | 0.36 | 51.31 | |
| 5 | 32 | 0.56 | 0.0125 | 0.0120 | 0.55 | 17.62 | |
| 6 | 25 | 0.80 | 0.0230 | 0.0217 | 0.38 | 19.47 | |
| 7 | 26 | 0.83 | 0.0220 | 0.0214 | 0.40 | 46.55 | |
| 8 | 28 | 0.79 | 0.0155 | 0.0148 | 0.25 | 27.84 | |
Performance characteristics for the PLS and iCONIC models (* indicates SECV is the correct error metric for PLS and is used here)
| Regression analysis of the prediction data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | SDP (mg/dL) | SEP (mg/dL) | Model size | β0 (mg/dL) | β1 | R2 |
| PLS | 35.57 | 15.92* | 208 | 13.57 | 0.9057 | |
| iCONIC | 35.57 | 9.76 | 208 | 6.33 | 0.9893 | |